Observational Study: Romiplostim for Platelet Recovery in Haploidentical HSCT
An Observational Study on the Promotion of Platelet Recovery by Romiplostim During Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
1 other identifier
observational
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this observational study is to explore the long-term effects of roprastine given to promote platelet implantation in hematopoietic stem cell hemicongruent transplantation in children with thalassemia. The main questions it aimed to answer is: Is roprastine safe and effective for platelet implantation in children with thalassemia hemicongruent transplantation? Participants who have already received roprastine as part of routine medical care for hematopoietic stem cell hemicongruent transplantation in children with thalassemia will answer online survey questions about the effects of their platelet implantation within 8 weeks.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Sep 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2026
CompletedJune 6, 2025
June 1, 2025
1.7 years
May 15, 2025
June 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Platelet recovery time
The time at nodes such as platelet \>20×10\^9/L, 50×10\^9/L and 100×10\^9/L
From enrollment to 28 days after transplantation
Platelet transfusion volume
The required dosage of platelet suspension
From enrollment to 28 days after transplantation
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Adverse drug reaction rate
From enrollment to 28 days after transplantation
Bleeding incidence rate
From enrollment to 28 days after transplantation
Thrombosis incidence rate
From enrollment to 28 days after transplantation
Survival rate
From enrollment to 28 days after transplantation
Recurrence - free survival rate
From enrollment to 28 days after transplantation
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
experimental group
After transplantation + 6 days, the subcutaneous injection of roprastine 3ug/kg was started, and the number of platelets in the machine-taken platelet suspension was increased by 2 µg/kg per week, and the maximum dose was 10 μg/kg. Discontinued until platelets rose to 100 × 109/L. If platelets ≤ 20 X 109/L were used for + 20 days, roprastine combined with atropopa 25mg was given orally once a day. Patients were given 1 therapeutic dose of fresh machine-taken platelet suspension when platelets were ≤ 20 X 109/L, or when there was active bleeding at 21\~ 50 × 109/L. The number of platelets in the machine-taken platelet suspension per therapeutic dose was \> 2.5 × 1011. If not implanted at + 28 days after transplantation, re-transplantation is required, and roprastine is considered ineffective.
Interventions
After transplantation + 6 days, the subcutaneous injection of roprastine 3ug/kg was started, and the number of platelets in the machine-taken platelet suspension was increased by 2 µg/kg per week, and the maximum dose was 10 μg/kg. Discontinued until platelets rose to 100 × 109/L. If platelets ≤ 20 X 109/L were used for + 20 days, roprastine combined with atropopa 25mg was given orally once a day. Patients were given 1 therapeutic dose of fresh machine-taken platelet suspension when platelets were ≤ 20 X 109/L, or when there was active bleeding at 21\~ 50 × 109/L. The number of platelets in the machine-taken platelet suspension per therapeutic dose was \> 2.5 × 1011. If not implanted at + 28 days after transplantation, re-transplantation is required, and roprastine is considered ineffective.
Eligibility Criteria
Children aged 2 - 17 years old who were diagnosed with severe thalassemia at Haikou People's Hospital and received haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
You may qualify if:
- After undergoing Mediterranean gene testing, reviewing the history of blood transfusions, and conducting a blood routine examination, the patient was diagnosed with severe thalassemia.
- Children aged 2 - 17 years old.
- Agree to the haploidentical transplantation, and the team has evaluated that there are no transplantation contraindications.
You may not qualify if:
- There is a fully matched donor, and transplantation with a half - matched donor is not agreed.
- For donors and recipients, the transaminase is more than twice the normal value.
- Donor specific antibody Greater than 5000, and after antibody treatment, it should not be lower than 3000.
- Positive for hepatitis B DNA.
- There is an active infection.
- After evaluation by the transplantation team, there are contraindications for transplantation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Haikou Affiliated Hospital of Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine
Haikou, Hainan, 570208, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xiaoyang Yang, MD
Department of Hematology, Haikou People's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 28 Days
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2025
First Posted
June 4, 2025
Study Start
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion
April 30, 2026
Study Completion
April 30, 2026
Last Updated
June 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The IPD encompasses highly sensitive and confidential data that was collected through significant investment of our resources, both in terms of time and funding. This data is integral to our ongoing research initiatives, which are at a crucial stage of development. Premature sharing could disrupt our research timelines and strategic plans. Additionally, we have not yet established comprehensive safeguards to ensure that the data will be used appropriately by external researchers. Without proper protocols in place, there is a risk of misuse or misinterpretation of the data, which could lead to inaccurate research outcomes and potential reputational damage to our institution. For these reasons, we have decided not to share the IPD at this time.