Efficacy of Transdermal Microneedle Patch for Topical Anesthesia Enhancement in Paediatric Thalassemia Patients
Transdermal Microneedle Patch To Enhance Topical Anaesthesia Before Intravenous Line Insertion for Blood Transfusion In Paediatric Thalassemia Patients
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Microneedle (MN) is the mimic of a hypodermic needle, composed of hundreds of micron-sized, out-of-plane protrusions, typically arranged in arrays on a patch that can be applied onto the skin. MN can be fabricated from a variety of materials, preferably biocompatible polymers. Maltose, a natural carbohydrate, is a safe and biocompatible product that can be fabricated into MNs that are biodegradable and soluble within minutes. So far, maltose MN efficacy in enhancing the transdermal drug delivery (TDD) of topical anaesthetic agent such as Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics (EMLA) and thus reducing the pain experienced by paediatric thalassemic patients requiring intravenous cannulation for regular blood transfusion has not been extensively studied. Therefore, the goals of this research are: 1) To compare the VAS score between thalassemic paediatric patients receiving EMLA before IV cannulation for blood transfusion and those receiving EMLA without microneedle application; 2) To compare the skin conductance algesimeter index between those receiving EMLA and microneedle and those receiving EMLA without microneedle application prior to intravenous (IV) cannulation for blood transfusion; 3) To evaluate the agreement between VAS score and the skin conductance algesimeter index obtained via PainMonitor™ machine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 11, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 11, 2022
CompletedSeptember 2, 2022
August 1, 2022
11 months
September 20, 2021
August 31, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
VAS score is measured in a continuous scale (range 0-100). It is obtained using a Med-05-100 VAS Pain Scale ruler (Schlenker Enterprises Ltd, Lombard, USA) with 0-100 mm slider. It is measured based on the pain experienced on the IV cannulated hand for blood transfusion. Higher VAS score indicates greater intensity or degree of pain whilst lower VAS score indicates lesser pain intensity.
The measurements will be made at 1 minute after IV cannulation which will be inserted following EMLA (with or without microneedle) application
Skin Conductance Algesimeter Index
The skin conductance peaks per second, measured in microSiemens per second (μS/s), is obtained using PainMonitor™ (Med-Storm Innovation AS, Oslo, Norway) device on the hypothenar eminence of the opposite hand not receiving blood transfusion. Higher skin conductance algesimeter index indicates greater pain intensity and lower values indicate lesser pain intensity.
The measurements will be made at 1 minute after IV cannulation which will be inserted following EMLA (with our without microneedle) application
Study Arms (4)
Intervention A: Microneedle with 1 Finger Tip Unit (FTU) EMLA for 30 minutes
EXPERIMENTALA Maltose Microneedle array patch (size: 1 cm x 1 cm) containing 36 microneedles (the height, base width and tip radius of each microneedle are 400 μm, 100 μm and 3 μm, respectively) with 1 mm needle gap in between will be firmly applied for 5 seconds against the pre-specified 1 cm x 1 cm grid (which will be the ideal site for intravenous cannulation for blood transfusion) on the dorsal surface of the hand. 1 Finger Tip Unit (FTU) of EMLA cream (containing an equal amount (25 mg) of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) (approximately 0.68g/cm2) will then be topically applied for 30 minutes on the same site of microneedle application. Intravenous cannulation will subsequently be carried out.
Intervention B: Microneedle with 0.5 Finger Tip Unit (FTU) EMLA for 30 minutes
EXPERIMENTALA Maltose Microneedle array patch (size: 1 cm x 1 cm) containing 36 microneedles (the height, base width and tip radius of each microneedle are 400 μm, 100 μm and 3 μm, respectively) with 1 mm needle gap in between will be firmly applied for 5 seconds against the pre-specified 1 cm x 1 cm grid (which will be the ideal site for intravenous cannulation for blood transfusion) on the dorsal surface of the hand. 0.5 Finger Tip Unit (FTU) of EMLA cream containing an equal amount (25 mg) of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5% (dose: approximately 0.369 g/cm2) will then be topically applied for 30 minutes on the same site of microneedle application. Intravenous cannulation will subsequently be carried out.
Intervention C: Microneedle with 1 Finger Tip Units (FTUs) EMLA for 15 minutes
EXPERIMENTALA Maltose Microneedle array patch (size: 1 cm x 1 cm) containing 36 microneedles (the height, base width and tip radius of each microneedle are 400 μm, 100 μm and 3 μm, respectively) with1 mm needle gap in between will be firmly applied for 5 seconds against the pre-specified 1 cm x 1 cm grid (which will be the ideal site for intravenous cannulation for blood transfusion) on the dorsal surface of the hand. One (1) Finger Tip Unit (FTU) of EMLA cream (containing an equal amount (25 mg) of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) (approximately 0.68g/cm2) will then be topically applied for 15 minutes on the same site of microneedle application. Intravenous cannulation will subsequently be carried out.
Intervention D: 1 Finger Tip Unit (FTUs) EMLA only and PVA-containing PET Sham Patch
SHAM COMPARATORA Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)-containing Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Sham Patch of 1 cm x 1cm size will be applied for 5 seconds against the pre-specified 1 cm x 1 cm grid (which will be the ideal site for intravenous cannulation for blood transfusion) on the dorsal surface of the hand. One (1) Finger Tip Unit (FTU) of EMLA cream (containing an equal amount (25 mg) of lidocaine 2.5% and prilocaine 2.5%) (approximately 0.68g/cm2) will then be topically applied for 30 minutes on the same site of microneedle application. Intravenous cannulation will subsequently be carried out.
Interventions
Maltose Microneedle Patch (Patch Size: 1 cm x 1 cm, 36 microneedles per patch, microneedle's height, base width and tip radius are 400 μm, 100 μm and 3 μm, respectively) will be firmly applied for 5 seconds on the 1 cm x 1 cm site for IV cannulation on the dorsal surface of the hand for blood transfusion, prior to EMLA cream application.
1 Finger Tip Units (FTU) EMLA applied for 30 minutes on the dorsal surface of the IV cannulated hand for blood transfusion
1 Finger Tip Unit (FTU) EMLA applied for 15 minutes on the dorsal surface of the IV cannulated hand
0.5 Finger Tip Unit (FTU) EMLA applied for 30 minutes on the dorsal surface of the IV cannulated hand for blood transfusion
A Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)-containing Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Sham Patch of a size of 1cm x 1cm will be applied for 5 seconds against the pre-specified 1 cm x 1 cm grid on the dorsal surface of the IV cannulated hand for blood transfusion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged at least 6 to 17 years old
- Patients requiring venous cannulation for blood transfusion
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a previous history of sensitization or allergy to EMLA cream
- Patients with a previous history of allergy to materials used in the study (e.g. Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA), Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET), Maltose, Electrodes and Plaster constituents)
- Patients receiving other forms of analgesic agents within 24 hours prior to the cannulation procedures
- Patients with generalized skin disorders / rash
- Patients who are agitated or aggressive
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (Ukm Medical Centre)
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
Related Publications (18)
Waghule T, Singhvi G, Dubey SK, Pandey MM, Gupta G, Singh M, Dua K. Microneedles: A smart approach and increasing potential for transdermal drug delivery system. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 Jan;109:1249-1258. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.10.078. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
PMID: 30551375BACKGROUNDTucak A, Sirbubalo M, Hindija L, Rahic O, Hadziabdic J, Muhamedagic K, Cekic A, Vranic E. Microneedles: Characteristics, Materials, Production Methods and Commercial Development. Micromachines (Basel). 2020 Oct 27;11(11):961. doi: 10.3390/mi11110961.
PMID: 33121041BACKGROUNDMooney K, McElnay JC, Donnelly RF. Children's views on microneedle use as an alternative to blood sampling for patient monitoring. Int J Pharm Pract. 2014 Oct;22(5):335-44. doi: 10.1111/ijpp.12081. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
PMID: 24308565BACKGROUNDPires LR, Vinayakumar KB, Turos M, Miguel V, Gaspar J. A Perspective on Microneedle-Based Drug Delivery and Diagnostics in Paediatrics. J Pers Med. 2019 Nov 15;9(4):49. doi: 10.3390/jpm9040049.
PMID: 31731656BACKGROUNDKim YC, Park JH, Prausnitz MR. Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012 Nov;64(14):1547-68. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 May 1.
PMID: 22575858BACKGROUNDde Waard-van der Spek FB, van den Berg GM, Oranje AP. EMLA cream: an improved local anesthetic. Review of current literature. Pediatr Dermatol. 1992 Jun;9(2):126-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1992.tb01228.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 1603740BACKGROUNDHouck CS, Sethna NF. Transdermal analgesia with local anesthetics in children: review, update and future directions. Expert Rev Neurother. 2005 Sep;5(5):625-34. doi: 10.1586/14737175.5.5.625.
PMID: 16162086BACKGROUNDDuarah S, Sharma M, Wen J. Recent advances in microneedle-based drug delivery: Special emphasis on its use in paediatric population. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2019 Mar;136:48-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
PMID: 30633972BACKGROUNDIta K. Transdermal Delivery of Drugs with Microneedles-Potential and Challenges. Pharmaceutics. 2015 Jun 29;7(3):90-105. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics7030090.
PMID: 26131647BACKGROUNDAli R, Mehta P, Arshad MS, Kucuk I, Chang MW, Ahmad Z. Transdermal Microneedles-A Materials Perspective. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2019 Dec 5;21(1):12. doi: 10.1208/s12249-019-1560-3.
PMID: 31807980BACKGROUNDCaffarel-Salvador E, Tuan-Mahmood TM, McElnay JC, McCarthy HO, Mooney K, Woolfson AD, Donnelly RF. Potential of hydrogel-forming and dissolving microneedles for use in paediatric populations. Int J Pharm. 2015 Jul 15;489(1-2):158-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.04.076. Epub 2015 May 1.
PMID: 25940042BACKGROUNDKolli CS, Banga AK. Characterization of solid maltose microneedles and their use for transdermal delivery. Pharm Res. 2008 Jan;25(1):104-13. doi: 10.1007/s11095-007-9350-0. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
PMID: 17597381BACKGROUNDTaddio A, Ohlsson A, Einarson TR, Stevens B, Koren G. A systematic review of lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) in the treatment of acute pain in neonates. Pediatrics. 1998 Feb;101(2):E1. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.2.e1.
PMID: 9445511BACKGROUNDBeltramini A, Milojevic K, Pateron D. Pain Assessment in Newborns, Infants, and Children. Pediatr Ann. 2017 Oct 1;46(10):e387-e395. doi: 10.3928/19382359-20170921-03.
PMID: 29019634BACKGROUNDStorm H. Changes in skin conductance as a tool to monitor nociceptive stimulation and pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008 Dec;21(6):796-804. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283183fe4.
PMID: 18997532BACKGROUNDNayak A, Das DB, Vladisavljevic GT. Microneedle-assisted permeation of lidocaine carboxymethylcellulose with gelatine co-polymer hydrogel. Pharm Res. 2014 May;31(5):1170-84. doi: 10.1007/s11095-013-1240-z. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
PMID: 24203493BACKGROUNDLoizidou EZ, Inoue NT, Ashton-Barnett J, Barrow DA, Allender CJ. Evaluation of geometrical effects of microneedles on skin penetration by CT scan and finite element analysis. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2016 Oct;107:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
PMID: 27373753BACKGROUNDDaly S, Claydon NCA, Newcombe RG, Seong J, Addy M, West NX. Randomised controlled trial of a microneedle patch with a topical anaesthetic for relieving the pain of dental injections. J Dent. 2021 Apr;107:103617. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103617. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
PMID: 33636242BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
FOOK-CHOE CHEAH, MD, MRCPCH, PhD
HOSPITAL CANSELOR TUANKU MUHRIZ, UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA MEDICAL CENTER
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
AZRUL A HAMZAN, BSc, PhD
INSTITUTE OF MICROENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS (IMEN), UKM
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
CHANG FU DEE, BSc, PhD
INSTITUTE OF MICROENGINEERING AND ELECTRONICS (IMEN), UKM
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
XIN YUN CHUA, BSc
HOSPITAL CANSELOR TUANKU MUHRIZ, UKM (UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA MEDICAL CENTRE)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- A Sham PVA-PET Patch that has the same size and structure as the maltose microneedle will be used. The participants, care providers and outcome assessors will not be able to distinguish between the maltose and sham patch due to their similar size and structure. One of the study investigators (Ooi Kai Shen) will not be masked since the person will be instituting the interventions. However, the study investigator (Ooi Kai Shen) is not one of the outcome assessors or care providers for the study participants.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2021
First Posted
October 14, 2021
Study Start
September 15, 2021
Primary Completion
August 11, 2022
Study Completion
August 11, 2022
Last Updated
September 2, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- The IPD will be made available to the public without any time frame limitation
- Access Criteria
- No access criteria are required. The data will be made available to the public, for all types of analyses for each study outcome measure, via the Harvard Dataverse repository, without requiring any access password or special access link.
Anonymized Individual Participant Data (IPD) with information such as date of birth, hospital registration number and others that may lead to patient identification removed will be shared via Harvard Dataverse Repository after the end of trial and data collection.