Validation of a Computerised Adaptive Test for Measuring Caregiver Well-being
NEW METHODOLOGIES FOR CUSTOMISING SUPPORT FOR FAMILIES OF CHILDREN WITH DIABETES: Validation of a Computerised Adaptive Test for Measuring Caregiver Well-being
1 other identifier
observational
108
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective of this project is to test whether a tool (questionnaire) is suitable for assessing how caregivers of children and adolescents with TD1 feel emotionally and psychologically. To do this, the investigators will use a technological system called 'Computerised Adaptive Testing' (CAT), which adapts the questions according to the answers of each participant. This allows the investigators to obtain a more accurate assessment tailored to each person's particular situation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 23, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 31, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 13, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 13, 2025
CompletedDecember 3, 2025
December 1, 2025
3 months
May 23, 2025
December 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Validity and reliability of the CAT system - Emotional outcome 1
These tend to be sensitive to change in short-term and will include distress assessed by the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and the distress thermometer. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 63. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate worse outcomes (greater levels of depression, anxiety, and stress).
Day 1 to Day 15 (Week 2)
Validity and reliability of the CAT system - Emotional outcome 2
These tend to be sensitive to change in short-term and will include perceived self-efficacy assessment by the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE). Minimum Value: 10. Maximum Value: 40. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better outcomes (greater self-efficacy).
Day 1 to Day 15 (Week 2)
Validity and reliability of the CAT system - Emotional outcome 3
Mental Health Continuum Short Form (MHC-SF): This is a 14-item scale that consists of 3 items measuring emotional well-being, 6 items measuring psychological well-being, and 5 items measuring social well-being. Minimum value: 14 Maximum value: 84. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater well-being in each domain.
Day 1 to Day 15 (Week 2)
Validity and reliability of the CAT system - Mood assessment
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) Unit of Measure: - Positive Affect (PA) score range: 10-50 (higher scores indicate greater positive affect). - Negative Affect (NA) score range: 10-50 (higher scores indicate greater negative affect). Description: PANAS is a self-report questionnaire measuring two dimensions of mood: positive and negative affect.
Day 1 to day 15 (Week 2)
Validity and reliability of the CAT system - Distress Assessment
Distress Thermometer Unit of Measure: Score on a 0-10 scale (higher scores indicate higher distress). Description: The Distress Thermometer is a single-item, self-report tool measuring psychological distress on a 0-10 scale.
Day 1 to Day 15 (Week 2)
Validity and reliability of the CAT system - Emotional outcome 4
WHO-5 Well-Being Index: Widely validated index to assess mental well-being. It consists of five statements relating to the past two weeks. Responses are rated on a 6-point scale. Minumum value=0, maximum value= 25. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better well-being. A raw score below 13 may suggest poor well-being and may warrant further evaluation for depression.
Day 1 to Day 15 (Week 2)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Usability and acceptability of the CAT
Day 15 (Week 2)
Study Arms (1)
Primary caregivers of a child with T1D
Caregivers who are the primary caregivers of a child with T1D.
Interventions
Evaluate the psychometric properties (e.g., reliability, validity) of the Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) system for assessing the well-being of caregivers of children with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D).
Eligibility Criteria
Primary caregivers of a child with T1D from Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet in Zaragoza.
You may qualify if:
- Caregivers aged ≥18 years who are the primary caregivers of a child with T1D.
- The child should be younger than 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of T1D.
- Willingness and ability to use a smartphone-based sensing system.
- Willingness to share retrospective continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from the child, specifically from the previous 2 months prior to joining the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Caregivers with significant cognitive or physical impairments preventing study participation.
- Inability to read or understand the Spanish language.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Adhera Health, Inc.lead
- Hospital Miguel Servetcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, Aragon, 50009, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Silverstein J, Klingensmith G, Copeland K, Plotnick L, Kaufman F, Laffel L, Deeb L, Grey M, Anderson B, Holzmeister LA, Clark N; American Diabetes Association. Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2005 Jan;28(1):186-212. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.1.186. No abstract available.
PMID: 15616254BACKGROUNDKatsarou A, Gudbjornsdottir S, Rawshani A, Dabelea D, Bonifacio E, Anderson BJ, Jacobsen LM, Schatz DA, Lernmark A. Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017 Mar 30;3:17016. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.16.
PMID: 28358037BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 23, 2025
First Posted
May 31, 2025
Study Start
May 26, 2025
Primary Completion
August 13, 2025
Study Completion
August 13, 2025
Last Updated
December 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share