Implant Stability Changes Using Underdrilling Versus Osseodensification Protocols for Posterior Dental Implants
Implant Stability And Changes In Ridge Width Using Underdrilling Versus Osseodensification Protocols For Posterior Dental Implant- A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial aims to compare two drilling protocols Underdrilling and Osseodensification for placing dental implants in patients with low bone density. The purpose is to compare which technique provides better primary and secondary implant stability in the posterior regions of the jaw with low bone density. The hypothesis is that there is no significant difference in implant stability between the two protocols.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2027
May 25, 2025
May 1, 2025
1 year
May 9, 2025
May 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Implant stability
It compares Primary stability and Secondary stability after implant placement. Primary stability is recorded by insertion torque values from manual torque wrench. Secondary stability is recorded by resonance frequency analysis.
12-18 months
Study Arms (2)
Osseodensification
ACTIVE COMPARATOROsseodensification uses special densa burs for osteotomy site compaction
Underilling
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn Underdrilling the osteotomy is smaller than implant diameter to be placed
Interventions
Osseodensification uses specially designed burs to densify osteotomy site
In underdrilling the osteotomy is smaller than implant diameter to be placed
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient partially edentulous ridge after extraction of more than 6 months and with low bone density.
- Systemically healthy patients ≥18 years of age.
You may not qualify if:
- Smokers.
- Pregnant or lactating females.
- Uncontrolled systemic disease like diabetes, hypertension, hormonal therapy and hematologic diseases.
- History of Maxillary sinus pathology.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
PGIDS
Rohtak, Haryana, 124001, India
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr.Ritika Arora, MDS
PGIDS,Rohtak
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double blinding will be performed. The patient, the outcome assessor and data analyst will be blinded to the allocation
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2025
First Posted
May 25, 2025
Study Start
September 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Last Updated
May 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share