NCT06988020

Brief Summary

Recent work has confirmed the diagnostic performance of pseudo-CT sequences for detecting osteolytic lesions. Their integration into whole body MRI (WB MRI) could transform the diagnostic approach to MM, by allowing a combined assessment of bone marrow involvement, tissue viability and osteolysis, during a single non-irradiating imaging examination. Since the preliminary work mentioned above, optimizations have been made to the pseudo-CT sequences, including the addition of deep learning (correcting noise in the images) and the correction of chemical shift artifact (linked to the coexistence of hydrated tissue and fatty tissue), which carry real hope of improving their diagnostic potential and accuracy.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
18mo left

Started Apr 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress41%
Apr 2025Nov 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 22, 2025

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 23, 2025

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 24, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

May 15, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 23, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

boneimagingmrimultiple myeloma

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the different imaging protocols

    The diagnostic performance of the different imaging protocols will be evaluated by analyzing the receptor efficiency function (ROC curve) and by estimating the Sensitivity (Se), Specificity (Sp), Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV) ) as well as the Predictive Accuracy (Acc) of the different imaging protocols.

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Comparison of Sensitivity (Se) and Predictive Precision (Acc) of the different imaging protocols

    through study completion, an average of 1 year

Study Arms (1)

Whole body MRI

OTHER

There is only one cohort where each patient have the standard of care follow up (PET/CT) and Whole body MRI- ZTE sequence for the study

Device: MRI

Interventions

MRIDEVICE

Whole body MRI including ZTE sequences

Whole body MRI

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, for whom bone imaging is required for staging.
  • Recurrent patient after intensive treatment (high dose chemotherapy, bone marrow transplant, etc.).
  • Patient requiring a PET / CT considered as the technique of choice in these stages of the disease.

You may not qualify if:

  • Implanted material incompatible with MRI.
  • Severe claustrophobia.
  • Pregnant women

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc

Brussels, Belgium

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Lecouvet FE, Zan D, Lepot D, Chabot C, Vekemans MC, Duchene G, Chiabai O, Triqueneaux P, Kirchgesner T, Taihi L, Poujol J, Gheysens O, Michoux N. MRI-based Zero Echo Time and Black Bone Pseudo-CT Compared with Whole-Body CT to Detect Osteolytic Lesions in Multiple Myeloma. Radiology. 2024 Oct;313(1):e231817. doi: 10.1148/radiol.231817.

    PMID: 39377681BACKGROUND
  • Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC, Malghem J, Maldague BE. Magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging in multiple myeloma. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2001;5(1):43-55. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-12920.

    PMID: 11371335BACKGROUND
  • Lecouvet FE, Boyadzhiev D, Collette L, Berckmans M, Michoux N, Triqueneaux P, Pasoglou V, Jamar F, Vekemans MC. MRI versus 18F-FDG-PET/CT for detecting bone marrow involvement in multiple myeloma: diagnostic performance and clinical relevance. Eur Radiol. 2020 Apr;30(4):1927-1937. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06469-1. Epub 2019 Dec 16.

    PMID: 31844960BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple Myeloma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms, Plasma CellNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHemostatic DisordersVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesParaproteinemiasBlood Protein DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesHemorrhagic DisordersLymphoproliferative DisordersImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Frédéric Lecouvet

    Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2025

First Posted

May 23, 2025

Study Start

April 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Ethic reason

Locations