Study Stopped
Surgical specialist nurses appointed to the intervention resigned from employment.
Effect of Nurse-led Education on Health, Quality of Life and Sexual Health
1 other identifier
interventional
51
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The main hypothesis is that a nurse-led education provided to patients who received endovascular treatment due to enlarged abdominal aorta would present a difference in perceived health, quality of life and sexual health.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 24, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 24, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2025
CompletedMay 22, 2025
April 1, 2025
4.1 years
April 1, 2025
May 20, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HeiQ)
A generic instrument (40 items), that measures health effects after education. The instrument consists of eight scales that measure different perceived health-related aspects: 1\. health directed activities, 2. positive and active engagement in life, 3. emotional distress, 4. self-monitoring and insight, 5. Constructive attitudes and approaches, 6. skills and technique acquisition, 7. social integration and support, and 8. health service navigation. The response options for each item are scored 1-4: "strongly disagree," "disagree," "agree" and "strongly agree." The HeiQ-scales are scored by summarizing within scale item scores, followed by dividing the sum with the number of scale items. A higher number represents better outcomes in all scales except for the emotional distress scale, where a higher score represents worse outcome.
from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment
Male Sexual Function-4 Questionnaire
Questionnaire consisting of four items designed to asses aspects of sexual function, as well as perception of overall sexual quality of life. The four items include interest in sex, achieving orgasm, quality of erection, and achieving ejaculation. Each item is scored on a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5. The raw scores are linearly transformed to a global sex life index ranging from 0 to 100, where a lower score indicates better preserved sexual function. For female participants, four specific items related to female sexual function were used, based on MSF-4 and derived from a previous study that investigated female patients undergoing colorectal surgery; first two items were interest in sex and achieving orgasm and both used a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5 where a lower score indicates better outcome. The second two items were problems with insufficient vaginal moisture and changes in the vaginal sense postoperatively, both items used binary yes/no answers.
from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (10)
EuroQol Five Dimension (EQ-5D-3L)
from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment
Complementary questions for the intervention
from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment
Complementary questions for sexual function
from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment
Laboratory analysis - Cholesterol
from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment
Laboratory analysis - Triglycerids
from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALthe intervention group received standard care plus they were also offered two consultations at a specialist surgical nurse-led clinic
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group received standard care.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients who received endovascular treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
- patients who could understand and communicate in Swedish.
You may not qualify if:
- cognitive impairment or language impairment that prevents communication and informed consent.
- patients who did not receive endovascular treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Monica Pettersson, Professor
Göteborg University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2025
First Posted
May 22, 2025
Study Start
April 20, 2015
Primary Completion
May 24, 2019
Study Completion
May 24, 2019
Last Updated
May 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04