NCT06986252

Brief Summary

The main hypothesis is that a nurse-led education provided to patients who received endovascular treatment due to enlarged abdominal aorta would present a difference in perceived health, quality of life and sexual health.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
51

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2015

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 20, 2015

Completed
4.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 24, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 24, 2019

Completed
5.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 1, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 22, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 22, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.1 years

First QC Date

April 1, 2025

Last Update Submit

May 20, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Health Education Impact Questionnaire (HeiQ)

    A generic instrument (40 items), that measures health effects after education. The instrument consists of eight scales that measure different perceived health-related aspects: 1\. health directed activities, 2. positive and active engagement in life, 3. emotional distress, 4. self-monitoring and insight, 5. Constructive attitudes and approaches, 6. skills and technique acquisition, 7. social integration and support, and 8. health service navigation. The response options for each item are scored 1-4: "strongly disagree," "disagree," "agree" and "strongly agree." The HeiQ-scales are scored by summarizing within scale item scores, followed by dividing the sum with the number of scale items. A higher number represents better outcomes in all scales except for the emotional distress scale, where a higher score represents worse outcome.

    from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment

  • Male Sexual Function-4 Questionnaire

    Questionnaire consisting of four items designed to asses aspects of sexual function, as well as perception of overall sexual quality of life. The four items include interest in sex, achieving orgasm, quality of erection, and achieving ejaculation. Each item is scored on a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5. The raw scores are linearly transformed to a global sex life index ranging from 0 to 100, where a lower score indicates better preserved sexual function. For female participants, four specific items related to female sexual function were used, based on MSF-4 and derived from a previous study that investigated female patients undergoing colorectal surgery; first two items were interest in sex and achieving orgasm and both used a six-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 5 where a lower score indicates better outcome. The second two items were problems with insufficient vaginal moisture and changes in the vaginal sense postoperatively, both items used binary yes/no answers.

    from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • EuroQol Five Dimension (EQ-5D-3L)

    from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment

  • Complementary questions for the intervention

    from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment

  • Complementary questions for sexual function

    from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment

  • Laboratory analysis - Cholesterol

    from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment

  • Laboratory analysis - Triglycerids

    from enrollment to 12 month after enrollment

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

the intervention group received standard care plus they were also offered two consultations at a specialist surgical nurse-led clinic

Other: Consultation

Control

NO INTERVENTION

The control group received standard care.

Interventions

Consultations at a specialist surgical nurse-led clinic

Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients who received endovascular treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
  • patients who could understand and communicate in Swedish.

You may not qualify if:

  • cognitive impairment or language impairment that prevents communication and informed consent.
  • patients who did not receive endovascular treatment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal

Interventions

Referral and Consultation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Aortic AneurysmAneurysmVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesAortic Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Professional PracticeOrganization and AdministrationHealth Services Administration

Study Officials

  • Monica Pettersson, Professor

    Göteborg University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2025

First Posted

May 22, 2025

Study Start

April 20, 2015

Primary Completion

May 24, 2019

Study Completion

May 24, 2019

Last Updated

May 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04