Comparison of Nasal Endotracheal Tube and Spiral Tube for Nasotracheal Intubation in Pediatric Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Nasotracheal intubation is often preferred in patients under general anesthesia for maxillofacial surgery or dental treatment to ensure airway safety and to work more comfortably in the surgical field. Compared to orotracheal intubation, the nasotracheal approach is a more convenient option, especially during procedures whose surgical site is in the oral region. Standard spiral intubation tubes are commonly used for nasotracheal intubation. However, there are also pre-shaped nasal intubation tubes that are specially designed to better fit the nasopharyngeal anatomical structure. The North Polar Tube, one of the most prominent of these tubes, is preferred because it is easier to insert through the nasal route and reduces potential trauma. In our hospital, nasal intubation is routinely preferred in pediatric patients under general anesthesia for dental procedures. However, there are not enough comparative studies in the literature on the advantages and disadvantages of different intubation tubes used in these applications, especially in the pediatric age group. In our hospital, nasal intubation is routinely performed in pediatric patients undergoing general anesthesia for dental treatments. In this study, the investigators will compare the spiral intubation tube and nasotracheal intubation tube used for intubation of these patients in terms of epistaxis, intubation time and difficulty of intubation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2025
CompletedFebruary 10, 2026
February 1, 2026
4 months
May 6, 2025
February 9, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
epistaxis frequency
epistaxis presence will be controlled at 0. minute and 5. minute after intubation. Epistaxis occurancy will be noted as present/absent. More incidence of epistaxis will be related to worse outcome.
perioperative period
severity of epistaxis
epistaxis severity will be measured at 0.and 5. minute after intubation. Severity will be classified as; none:no blood observed on either the surface of the tube or the posterior pharyngeal wall mild:blood apparent on the surface of the tube or posterior pharyngeal wall moderate: pooling of blood on the posterior pharyngeal wall severe: large amount of blood in the pharynx impeding nasotracheal intubation and necessitating urgent orotracheal intubation The outcome gets worse as it goes from none to severe.
perioperative period
Secondary Outcomes (2)
intubation duration
perioperative
intubation difficulty
perioperative
Study Arms (2)
north polar tube
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients who intubated with north polar tube
spiral tube
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients who intubated with spiral tube
Interventions
intubation tube will be placed from nasal orifice through nazopharyngeal pathway to place into trachea
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being between 3-18 years old
- No anomaly preventing nasal intubation
- To be in ASA1-2 classification according to ASA criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Lack of consent of the patient/ relatives
- Facial anomaly that prevents nasal intubation
- Being in the ASA3-4 group according to ASA criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Dicle Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Dicle university Faculty of dentistry
Diyarbakır, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Fikret Salik, specialist
Dicle university faculty of medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- medicine doctor anesthesiology specialist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2025
First Posted
May 22, 2025
Study Start
May 2, 2025
Primary Completion
August 30, 2025
Study Completion
October 30, 2025
Last Updated
February 10, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 3 months after publication of results
- Access Criteria
- medicine doctors, dentists
all collected IDP