Neurolytic Block Techniques In Abdominal Visceral Cancer Pain
CONCERN
Comparison of Neurolytic Block Techniques for the Treatment of Abdominal Visceral Pain and Their Influence On The Quality of Life of Patients With Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The neurolytic blocks of sympathetic chains are commonly used for the treatment of cancer-related pain. This study aims to compare celiac plexus neurolysis and splanchnic nerve neurolysis for the treatment of abdominal visceral pain and its influence on the quality of life of patients with cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
ExpectedJune 3, 2025
May 1, 2025
11 months
May 10, 2025
May 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
PAIN SCORE
Pain will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), a scale from 0 to 10 where: 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst possible pain. Scores are typically categorized as: Mild pain: 0-3 Moderate pain: 4-6 Severe pain: 7-10 Additionally, the Descriptive Verbal Scale will be used, with the following categories: No pain Mild pain Moderate pain Severe pain.
1st Day Post-procedure; 15th Day Post-procedure; 30th Day Post-procedure; 2nd Month Post-procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Quality of life assessment.
1st Day Post-procedure; 15th Day Post-procedure; 30th Day Post-procedure; 2nd Month Post-procedure
Adverse Events
1st Day Post-procedure; 15th Day Post-procedure; 30th Day Post-procedure; 2nd Month Post-procedure
Study Arms (2)
CELIAC PLEXUS NEUROLYSIS
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patient, under sedation and breathing spontaneously with oxygen support, will be placed in the horizontal prone position. Fluoroscopy will be used to locate the first lumbar vertebra, which will serve as a reference for the puncture site. Two 22G × 15 cm needles will be introduced bilaterally, up to 6 cm from the midline at the level of L1, and directed superiorly toward the transverse process of L1 under coaxial vision. Once they reach the vertebral body bilaterally, the needles will be positioned anterior to the vertebral body of L1, in the retroperitoneal region. The needle stylet will be removed, and the absence of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, or urine returning through the needle will be verified. If none of these signs are present, 2 ml of non-ionic contrast will be administered through the needle to confirm proper positioning in the retroperitoneum. After confirmation, 5 ml of absolute alcohol will be injected bilaterally.
SPLANCHNIC NERVE NEUROLYSIS
EXPERIMENTALThe patient, under spontaneous breathing with oxygen support, will be placed in the horizontal prone position and supported by cushions placed under the iliac crests and chest. With a mark maintained over T11, the fluoroscopy machine will be positioned obliquely (approximately 45º), and the movement of the diaphragm-as well as its relationship with the vertebral body-will be observed during inspiration and expiration. The entry point will be at the junction of the rib and the vertebral body. The needle will be introduced using coaxial visualization to reach the lateral aspect of the vertebral body, near the costovertebral angle. With the fluoroscopy in profile, the needle will be advanced to the anterior third of the vertebral body, and any return of blood or cerebrospinal fluid will be checked. Non-ionic contrast will then be injected to confirm the needle position in both anteroposterior and lateral views. Finally, 5 ml of absolute alcohol will be injected through each needle.
Interventions
Splanchnic neurolysis will be performed with 5 ml of absolute alcohol on each side at the level of the eleventh thoracic vertebra.
Celiac plexus neurolysis will be performed with 5 ml of absolute alcohol on each side at the level of the first lumbar vertebra.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18 years or older Presence of localized visceral pain in the upper abdomen originating from cancer of the stomach, duodenum, distal esophagus, ascending or transverse colon, liver, biliary tract, or pancreas
- Ineffectiveness of analgesic treatment with third-step opioids according to the WHO analgesic ladder, including:
- Opioids (≥ 60 mg/day of morphine equivalents) Antidepressants (tricyclic or dual-action), at any dosage Gabapentinoids, at any dosage Presence of side effects from analgesics that are difficult to manage with medication
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of ascites Presence of deep vein thrombosis Presence of hepatic failure: Child-Pugh class B or C Presence of renal failure: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \< 60 ml/min/1.73 m² Use of any anticoagulant medication
- Clinical coagulation disorder, defined as:
- INR \> 1.5 Prothrombin activity \< 70% or prothrombin time \> 13.5 seconds aPTT \> 40 seconds Cardiovascular failure: NYHA class III
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Instituto de Cancer Do Estado
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil
Related Publications (9)
Koyyalagunta D, Engle MP, Yu J, Feng L, Novy DM. The Effectiveness of Alcohol Versus Phenol Based Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis for the Treatment of Intra-Abdominal Cancer Pain. Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):281-92.
PMID: 27228515BACKGROUNDAhmed A, Arora D. Fluoroscopy-guided Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block for Intractable Pain from Upper Abdominal Malignancies in Patients with Distorted Celiac Axis Anatomy: An Effective Alternative to Celiac Plexus Neurolysis - A Retrospective Study. Indian J Palliat Care. 2017 Jul-Sep;23(3):274-281. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_28_17.
PMID: 28827930BACKGROUNDUehara Y, Matsumoto Y, Kosugi T, Sone M, Nakamura N, Mizushima A, Miyashita M, Morita T, Yamaguchi T, Satomi E. Availability of and factors related to interventional procedures for refractory pain in patients with cancer: a nationwide survey. BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Sep 26;21(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01056-6.
PMID: 36154936BACKGROUNDHochberg U, Ingelmo P, Sole E, Miro J, Rivera G, Perez J. Early Interventional Treatments for Patients with Cancer Pain: A Narrative Review. J Pain Res. 2023 May 18;16:1663-1671. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S405808. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37223437BACKGROUNDNoble M, Gress FG. Techniques and results of neurolysis for chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer pain. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2006 Apr;8(2):99-103. doi: 10.1007/s11894-006-0004-x.
PMID: 16533471BACKGROUNDComlek S. Pain Control with Splanchnic Neurolysis in Pancreatic Cancer Patients Unresponsive to Celiac Plexus Neurolysis. J Pain Res. 2020 Aug 12;13:2023-2031. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S266689. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32848449BACKGROUNDYamamuro M, Kusaka K, Kato M, Takahashi M. Celiac plexus block in cancer pain management. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2000 Sep;192(1):1-18. doi: 10.1620/tjem.192.1.
PMID: 11128864BACKGROUNDPaul A, Borkar A. Fluoroscopy-Guided Splanchnic Nerve Block for Cancer-Associated Pain. Cureus. 2022 Oct 31;14(10):e30944. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30944. eCollection 2022 Oct.
PMID: 36465781BACKGROUNDLu F, Li X, Song L, Ye L, Wang X, Wang R. Efficacy and Safety of Celiac Plexus Neurolysis Versus Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis in the Management of Abdominal Cancer Pain: A Meta-analysis of 359 Patients. Pain Physician. 2024 Jan;27(1):1-10.
PMID: 38285023BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Angela M Sousa, MD. PhD.
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Coordinator of the Pain Group at the Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2025
First Posted
May 18, 2025
Study Start
May 30, 2025
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
June 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05