Sleep Quality in Surgical Intensive Care
The Effect of Eye Mask on Sleep Quality in Patients Hospitalised in Surgical Intensive Care Unit: Non-Randomised Experimental Study
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It is thought that transferring low-cost and easily applicable interventions that can be used to control environmental stressors such as noise and light that negatively affect sleep quality, especially in intensive care environments, into clinical practice will improve the quality of nursing care. It is recommended that complementary interventions that can be used to improve such sleep quality should be tested and supported by new studies. In this study, it was aimed to determine the effect of eye mask on sleep quality in patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit after abdominal surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 15, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2025
CompletedMay 22, 2025
May 1, 2025
3 months
May 14, 2025
May 20, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Sleep status
This form was developed by the researcher using the literature on the subject. The form was filled in based on the self-report of the patients. In order to determine the sleep status of the patients, the form included 5 statements: 'I feel tired and sleepy during the day despite sleeping for a sufficient amount of time', 'I have difficulty falling asleep 2-3 nights a week', 'I have to constantly move my legs in bed', 'I have to go to the toilet at least once during the night', 'I wake up tired and with a headache in the morning'.
On the 3rd postoperative day
Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) Score
It is a ten-level scale developed by Cook and Palma (1989) in which eye contact, which is not present in other scales, is evaluated following the verbal stimulus. In the scale, a score of '0' indicates the ideal level where the patient is awake and calm, while values up to '+4' reflect increasing agitation and values up to '-5' reflect increasing sedation level. As the scale score increases, it is interpreted as the agitation status of the patients worsens.
Postoperative 1st, 2nd and 3rd days
Richard-Campbell Sleep Scale (RCS) Score
Richard-Campbell Sleep Scale (RCS): In 1987, the Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Richards in 2015 by Özlü and Özer. The scale consists of 6 items evaluating sleep quality, depth of sleep at night, frequency of awakening, ambient sound level, time of staying awake and time to fall asleep. Each item is evaluated on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. A score between '0-25' indicates very poor sleep and a score between '76-100' indicates very good sleep. As the scale score increases, patients' It is interpreted that sleep quality has increased.
Postoperative 1st, 2nd and 3rd days
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention group patients were fitted with an eye mask designed by the researcher by placing a black fabric in the size of the mask between two three-layer surgical masks with Asfor brand soft elastic earphones and stapling the edges. The designed eye mask was cut with scissors according to the shape of the nose so that the mask would fit the eye exactly and prevent the light from entering the eye. A separate mask was used for each patient in the intervention group. Patients who were admitted to the SICU after surgery were evaluated for agitation-pain-delirium at 23:00 on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2, were told to wear their eye masks after the scale application, and the patients were allowed to sleep at 23:00 at the latest. Patients were allowed to remove the eye patch for short periods of time (10 minutes or less at a time) and then put it back on when uncomfortable and when necessary.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONControl group received the usual care.
Interventions
The intervention group patients were fitted with an eye mask designed by the researcher by placing a black fabric in the size of the mask between two three-layer surgical masks with Asfor brand soft elastic earphones and stapling the edges. The designed eye mask was cut with scissors according to the shape of the nose so that the mask would fit the eye exactly and prevent the light from entering the eye. A separate mask was used for each patient in the intervention group. Patients who were admitted to the NICU after surgery were evaluated for agitation-pain-delirium at 23:00 on postoperative days 0, 1, and 2, were told to wear their eye masks after the scale application, and the patients were allowed to sleep at 23:00 at the latest. Patients were allowed to remove the eye patch for short periods of time (10 minutes or less at a time) and then put it back on when uncomfortable and when necessary.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- had undergone abdominal surgery
- over 18 years of age,
- who speak Turkish,
- who have not received any diagnosis related to mental health,
- who are open to communication and co-operation
- Patients who voluntarily agreed to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- patients with a history of neurological or psychiatric disorders
- patients with any eye disease
- patients who are unable or unwilling to wear an eye mask
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Aydın Adnan Menderes University
Aydin, Zafer Mahallesi, 09010, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD, Research Assisstant (Principal Investigator)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2025
First Posted
May 15, 2025
Study Start
November 15, 2022
Primary Completion
February 15, 2023
Study Completion
June 15, 2023
Last Updated
May 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 12 months after publication
The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.