Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasm
1 other identifier
interventional
104
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to investigate the role of the flexible auxiliary single-arm transluminal endoscopic robot (FASTER) system in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and to validate its superiority over conventional ESD in terms of reducing procedural difficulty, shortening procedure time, and enhancing procedural safety. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the use of the FASTER system improve the dissection speed of the ESD procedure? Does the use of the FASTER system reduce the procedure and dissection time, improving the efficacy of the ESD procedure? Does the use of the FASTER system reduce the rate of perforation and hemorrhage, improving the safety of the ESD procedure? Researchers will compare FASTER-assisted ESD and conventional ESD to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the FASTER system. Participants will: Be randomly assigned to the group with ESD using the traditional procedure or to the group with ESD assisted by the FASTER system. Keep a diary of their symptoms after the procedure. ESD has gained widespread acceptance as the standard method for treating early-stage gastrointestinal cancers. However, ESD is a technically demanding and intricate procedure that requires advanced proficiency of operators, with a heightened risk of complications such as hemorrhage and perforation. The inherent challenges of the colorectal ESD are further amplified by the thin mucosa, highly tortuous and flexible lumen, and occasional obstruction of lesions by mucosal folds, all of which collectively elevate both the procedural difficulty and the probability of postoperative complications. Adequate exposure of the submucosa layer through effective tissue traction is vital for the safe and effective performance of ESD. The FASTER system is designed to overcome this technical difficulty.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2026
May 21, 2025
May 1, 2025
1.6 years
May 7, 2025
May 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
procedure time
Procedure time is the time from the beginning of injection to the completion of dissection.
Within 24 hours after the procedure.
Secondary Outcomes (18)
dissection time
Within 24 hours after the procedure.
dissection speed
Within 24 hours after the procedure.
en bloc resection rate
Within 24 hours after the procedure.
R0 resection rate
Within 24 hours after the procedure.
perforation rate
Within 24 hours after the procedure.
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
FASTER-assisted ESD
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group undergo ESD with the assistance of the FASTER system.
Conventional ESD
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group undergo ESD following the clinically established pattern.
Interventions
The patients who are randomly assigned to the FASTER-assisted ESD group will undergo the ESD procedure with the assistance of the FASTER system.
The patients who are randomly assigned to the conventional ESD group will undergo the ESD following the clinically established pattern.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18-85.
- Patients with pathologically verified colorectal neoplasms scheduled to undergo ESD.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients have lesions with confirmed or potential deep submucosal invasion or lymph node metastasis or other conditions that are not suitable for endoscopic therapy.
- Patients with severe underlying diseases precluding endotracheal intubation, general anesthesia, or surgery.
- Patients have a history of colorectal malignancy with previous radiotherapy or operative treatment leading to changes in colorectal structure.
- Patients have lesions with local recurrence after endoscopic resection.
- Patients unable to obtain informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2025
First Posted
May 15, 2025
Study Start
June 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2026
Last Updated
May 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05