Study Stopped
Change in operative and administrative functions
Efficacy & Tolerability of Rigth Unilateral vs. Bitemporal ECT in Schizophrenia in a Psychiatric Hospital in Mexico
ULTEC
Cohort Study on Efficacy and Tolerance of Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy vs. Bitemporal in Patients With Paranoid Schizophrenia in Acute Psychosis at Fray Bernardino Álvarez Psychiatric Hospital
1 other identifier
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an established treatment for medication-resistant schizophrenia. There is debate about the best method of electrode placement. Bitemporal (BT) placement is commonly used for schizophrenia, while right unilateral (RUL) placement in mood disorders is associated with fewer adverse effects on memory and language. This study compares the efficacy, safety and cognitive effects of BT-ECT versus RUL-ECT in hospitalized schizophrenia patients with acute psychosis. Main Question: Does RUL-ECT reduce psychotic symptoms with fewer cognitive effects versus BT-ECT in patients with severe schizophrenia? Hypothesis: RUL-ECT is as effective as BT-ECT in reducing psychotic symptoms with fewer cognitive effects. Methods: Randomized trial in patients with schizophrenia (confirmed by DSM 5 criteria) and severe symptoms (PANSS score ≥60). Patients were assigned to receive BT-ECT or RUL-ECT. Efficacy was measured by a ≥30% reduction in symptom severity on the PANSS scale and overall improvement measured with the Clinical Global Impression scale. Cognitive function was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) scales.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 16, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 16, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2025
CompletedMay 15, 2025
May 1, 2025
1.6 years
April 20, 2025
May 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy technique
Treatment response is defined as a ≥20% reduction in the total score of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) after treatment. A dichotomous classification was applied (responders vs. non-responders) The PANSS assesses symptom severity through 30 items, each scored on a 1-7 scale, where: 1 = Absent (no symptom) and 7 = Extreme (severe symptom). Higher PANSS scores indicate greater symptom severity, meaning a lower score reflects a better clinical outcome.
48 hours after last ECT session
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Adverse effect incidence
Between two hours and 24 hours after the last ECT session
Time to adverse event onset measured in number of sessions
From the first session until 48 hours after last session
Cognitive changes measured by MoCA
48 hours after last ECT session
Cognitive changes measured by BACS
48 hours after last ECT session
Study Arms (2)
Rigth unilateral electrode placement
EXPERIMENTALAnode (Right Temporal): Centered over the right temporal lobe, 2.5 cm (1 inch) above the midpoint of an imaginary line connecting the tragus and the external canthus. Cathode (Right Parietal): Placed vertically 10 cm (4 inches) above the temporal electrode, aligned with the parietal bone (midline between the temporal and occipital regions).
Bitemporal electrode placement
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnode placed over the left temporal region: Positioned 2.5 cm (1 inch) above the midpoint of an imaginary line connecting the tragus (ear canal) and the external canthus (outer corner) of the left eye. Catode positioned over the right temporal region: Mirror placement on the right side, symmetrically aligned with the left electrode.
Interventions
Therapeutic seizure induction with pulse unidirectional electric charge through the right hemisphere, using ultrabrief pulses (≤0.3 ms).
Therapeutic seizure induction with pulse unidirectional electric charge through the temporal hemisferes, using brief pulses (≥0.5 ms).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Spanish-speaking.
- any sex/gender.
- Aged ≥18 years.
- \. Diagnosis of schizophrenia per DSM-5 criteria. 4. Baseline PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) total score ≥60. 5. Treatment with 1-2 antipsychotics (including clozapine).
You may not qualify if:
- Received ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) within the previous 3 months.
- Comorbid affective disorders (e.g., bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder).
- Catatonia or catatonic syndrome.
- Pregnancy
- Contraindications to general anesthesia/ECT (i.e. uncontrolled cardiovascular disease or intracranial hypertension).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Psiquiátrico Fray Bernardino Álvarez
México, Mexico
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Attending Psychiatrist, Psychiatric Emergency Department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2025
First Posted
May 15, 2025
Study Start
March 16, 2023
Primary Completion
October 16, 2024
Study Completion
November 16, 2024
Last Updated
May 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Starting in January 2025
- Access Criteria
- Access will be granted to researchers who contact the principal investigator directly
All IPD that underlie results in a publication