NCT06965400

Brief Summary

This prospective, randomized controlled cross-over study compares automatic (IntelliCuff®) and manual methods of endotracheal tube cuff pressure (CP) monitoring in pediatric intensive care patients. The study evaluates the frequency and duration of cuff pressure deviations outside the recommended range (15-25 cmH₂O) and assesses the impact on nursing workload.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 2, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 2, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 11, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 15, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 25, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

May 2, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 22, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Cuff pressureAutomatic monitoringMechanical ventilation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Total Time Spent Under Low Cuff Pressure

    TTotal cumulative time (in hours) during which the endotracheal tube cuff pressure remained below 15 cmH₂O throughout the 24-hour monitoring period in each study phase.

    24 hours per intervention phase

  • Total Time Spent Under High Cuff Pressure

    Total cumulative time (in hours) during which cuff pressure exceeded 25 cmH₂O in either monitoring method.

    24 hours per intervention phase

  • Number of Manual Corrections Required Number of Manual Corrections Required Number of Manual Corrections Required Number of Manual Corrections Required Number of Manual Corrections Required

    The number of times the cuff pressure had to be manually corrected due to deviations from the target range during each phase.

    24 hours per intervention phase

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Total Nursing Intervention Time

    24 hours per intervention phase

Study Arms (2)

Manual Cuff Pressure Monitoring

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In this arm, cuff pressure was manually measured and adjusted every 2 hours by nurses using a manometer, to maintain a target pressure between 15 and 25 cmH₂O over a 24-hour period.

Device: Automatic Cuff Pressure Control

Automatic Cuff Pressure Monitoring

EXPERIMENTAL

In this phase, endotracheal tube cuff pressure was continuously monitored using the IntelliCuff® system (Hamilton Medical, Switzerland), which automatically adjusted the pressure to maintain it within the target range of 15-25 cmH₂O. Nurses intervened only if the system alerted due to a deviation.

Device: Automatic Cuff Pressure Control

Interventions

he IntelliCuff® system (Hamilton Medical, Switzerland) continuously monitored and automatically adjusted cuff pressure to keep it within the target range of 15-25 cmH₂O. Manual intervention was only required upon system alert.

Also known as: IntelliCuff System
Automatic Cuff Pressure MonitoringManual Cuff Pressure Monitoring

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Month - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with tracheostomy, known tracheal pathology, extubated within 48 hours, or those requiring frequent ventilator adjustments due to clinical instability were excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Aydin Obstetric and pediatrics Hospital

Aydin, 09020, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Cam Sakura Research and Training Hospital

Istanbul, 34001, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Acibadem University, Acibadem Altunizade Hospital

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

The Health Sciences University Izmir Behçet Uz Child Health and Diseases Research and Training Hospital

Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Topjian AA, Raymond TT, Atkins D, Chan M, Duff JP, Joyner BL Jr, Lasa JJ, Lavonas EJ, Levy A, Mahgoub M, Meckler GD, Roberts KE, Sutton RM, Schexnayder SM; Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support Collaborators. Part 4: Pediatric Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S469-S523. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000901. Epub 2020 Oct 21. No abstract available.

    PMID: 33081526BACKGROUND
  • Vottier G, Matrot B, Jones P, Dauger S. A cross-over study of continuous tracheal cuff pressure monitoring in critically-ill children. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jan;42(1):132-3. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4103-8. Epub 2015 Oct 29. No abstract available.

  • Dauvergne JE, Geffray AL, Asehnoune K, Rozec B, Lakhal K. Automatic regulation of the endotracheal tube cuff pressure with a portable elastomeric device. A randomised controlled study. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2020 Jun;39(3):435-441. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 May 4.

  • Zhu G, Wang X, Cao X, Yang C, Wang B, Ang Y, Duan M. The effect of different endotracheal tube cuff pressure monitoring systems on postoperative sore throat in patients undergoing tracheal intubation: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Mar 25;24(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02499-5.

  • Chenelle CT, Oto J, Sulemanji D, Fisher DF, Kacmarek RM. Evaluation of an automated endotracheal tube cuff controller during simulated mechanical ventilation. Respir Care. 2015 Feb;60(2):183-90. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03387. Epub 2014 Nov 25.

  • Alzahrani AR, Al Abbasi S, Abahoussin OK, Al Shehri TO, Al-Dorzi HM, Tamim HM, Sadat M, Arabi YM. Prevalence and predictors of out-of-range cuff pressure of endotracheal and tracheostomy tubes: a prospective cohort study in mechanically ventilated patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015 Oct 15;15:147. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0132-7.

Study Officials

  • Hasan Agin, Prof.Dr.

    Dr. Behcet Uz Children's Hospital

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: 48 hours total (24 hours each phase, manual vs. automatic)
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof.Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2025

First Posted

May 11, 2025

Study Start

May 2, 2025

Primary Completion

August 1, 2025

Study Completion

August 15, 2025

Last Updated

November 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations