Comparison of Lma-Protector With Endotracheal Tube: Evaluation of Respiratory Mechanical Parameters During Controlled Ventilation & Possibility of Pulmonary Aspiration
Comparison of Protector Laryngeal Mask With Endotracheal Tube: Evaluation of Respiratory Mechanical Parameters During Controlled Ventilation & Possibility of Pulmonary Aspiration
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this prospective, randomized, comparative, controlled clinical study is to compare laryngeal mask airway ProtectorTM with the endotracheal tube, regarding to the respiratory mechanical parameters during controlled mechanical ventilation and the prevalence of aspiration. Aspiration will be evaluated by detecting and quantifying pepsin (a marker of gastric aspiration) and α-amylase (a marker of salivary aspiration) in the bronchoalveolar lavage ( mini BAL) of patients ≥18 years old, ASA 1-2, undergoing selective low-risk surgery under general anesthesia in a lithotomy position.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2025
CompletedJune 25, 2024
June 1, 2024
4 months
June 5, 2024
June 19, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Difference in PIP cmH20 (Peak inspiratory pressure ) between the two groups of patients.
Measured by Ventilator
Intraoperative
Assessment of aspiration risk by quantitative measurements of pepsin (ng/ml) and α-amylase (IU/ml) in BAL of patients and differences in its incidence between the two groups.
Measured by ELISA method
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Differences in lung mechanics between the two patient groups
Intraoperative
Study Arms (2)
LMA Protector
EXPERIMENTALLMA Protector will be inserted by a researcher after standard anesthesia induction. The view of the larynx will be assessed using fiberoptic grading scale. Mini bronchoalveolar lavage will be colected at the end of the procedure
Endotracheal tube
EXPERIMENTALPatients will be intubated after standard anesthesia induction.The view of the larynx will be assessed ( Cormack Lehane system).Mini bronchoalveolar lavage will be colected at the end of the procedure
Interventions
LMA Protector will be inserted by a researcher after standard anesthesia induction. The view of the larynx will be assessed using fiberoptic grading scale.Mini bronchoalveolar lavage will be collected before the end of the procedure
tracheal intubation will be perform after standard anaesthetic induction. Cormack Lehane will be recorded. Mini bronchoalveolar lavage will be collected before the end of the procedure
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged ≥18 years ASA1-2 who are to undergo planned urological surgery of low or intermediate severity, under general anesthesia in the lithotomy position.
You may not qualify if:
- patients \< 18 years old.
- Patients who are going to undergo an emergency/urgent operation/ trauma patients.
- Maternal population.
- Patients who are not scheduled to receive general anesthesia, but some other type of anesthesia.
- Patients in whom LMA placement is contraindicated, such as patients at high risk for reflux and aspiration of gastric contents (eg, history of gastroesophageal reflux, hiatal hernia, pyloric stenosis, gastrointestinal obstruction, morbid obesity).
- Patients who meet at least one of the four RODS difficulty criteria.
- Contraindicated patients: administration of neuromuscular blockade, suppression of spontaneous respiration, and those with an indication for awake intubation or surgical airway.
- Patients who refuse to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
General Univerisity Hospital of Patras
Pátrai, Greece
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 5, 2024
First Posted
June 25, 2024
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 1, 2024
Study Completion
March 1, 2025
Last Updated
June 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06