Clinical Study on the Safety and Efficacy of the Minimally Invasive Ennovate® Method for Pedicle Screw Placement
MISPEC
Controlled, Randomized Clinical Study to Demonstrate the Patient Benefit and Safety of Pedicle Screw Placement Through an Innovative Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach Using the Ennovate® Cervical Spinal System
1 other identifier
interventional
76
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The study's main purpose is the collection of clinical data on the patients benefit and safety of pedicle screw placement through an innovative minimally invasive surgical approach compared to the state of the art open surgical approach using the Ennovate® Cervical Spinal System.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2028
April 15, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.4 years
April 16, 2025
April 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which state "0" at one end representing "no pain" and "100" at the opposite end representing "maximal/worst pain". Pain will be recorded at minimum 12 months postoperatively, if available in the preoperative clinical routine data, it will also be recorded in the study.
4 (+/- 1 day) postoperative
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Screw placement accuracy
intraoperative or discharge visit (approx. 10 days post op.)
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
praeoperative, postoperative (4 days +/- 1day, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years)
Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)
praeoperative, postoperative (4 days +/- 1day, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years)
Quality of Life (EQ-VAS)
praeoperative, postoperative (4 days +/- 1day, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years)
Rate of Adverse Events / Serious Adverse Events
During the course of the study up to two years postoperatively
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Implantation Ennovate® Cervical system using an open surgical technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORImplantation Ennovate® Cervical system using a minimally invasive technique.
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Patients with need of posterior monosegmental and multisegmenta stabilization of the cervical and upper thoracic spine, because of * Fractures * Degenerative instability * Post-trauma instability * Tumors * Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis will be treated with Ennovate® Cervical system using an open surgical technique
Patients with need of posterior monosegmental and multisegmenta stabilization of the cervical and upper thoracic spine, because of * Fractures * Degenerative instability * Post-trauma instability * Tumors * Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis will be treated with Ennovate® Cervical system using a minimally invasive technique.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients with minimum 18 years of age receiving Ennovate® Cervical internal fixation device within the vertebral bodies C2-Th3 to ensure the restoration and stabilization of the cervical spine
You may not qualify if:
- All patients not willing to sign the patient consent are excluded. Also, if it is clear from the beginning, that the patient will not be able to come to routine follow-up, the patient will also be excluded.
- Absolute contraindications according to the IFU:
- Severe damage to the bone structures of the spine that could prevent the stable implantation of the implant components; for example, osteopenia, severe osteoporosis, Paget's disease, bone tumors etc.
- Metabolic or degenerative metabolic bone diseases that could compromise the stable anchoring of the implant system.
- Suspected allergy or sensitivity to the implant materials.
- Acute or chronic vertebral infections of a local or systemic nature.
- Poor patient compliance or limited ability to follow medical instructions, particularly in the postop phase, including with regard to the restrictions on range of movement in terms of physical exercise and occupational activity.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aesculap AGlead
Study Sites (3)
Universitätsklinikum Aachen
Aachen, 52074, Germany
Charité Berlin
Berlin, 10117, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, 70196, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Block randomization with random block length will be used. The electronic data capture system will instruct the clinical investigator to use either the open or the minimally invasive surgical technique.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2025
First Posted
May 7, 2025
Study Start
June 20, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 15, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share