A Comparison Between Bladder Dissection Before and After Uterine Incision During Cesarean Section for Placenta Accreta Spectrum: A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
80
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The worldwide incidence of placenta accreta spectrum is increasing, following the trend of rising caesarean delivery. It is an heterogeneous condition associated with a high maternal morbidity and mortality rate (Jauniaux et al., 2018). caesarean hysterectomy is considered the gold standard for the treatment of placenta accreta. Also this radical approach is associated with high rates of severe maternal morbidity as hemorrhage and insult to surrounding organs during surgery (Hoffman et al., 2010). Surgeons should be able to dissect the bladder safely and confidently through minimally invasive techniques, to avoid surgical injury, it is important to use anatomic landmarks, minimize the use of cauterization (Farhat and Casale, 2018). All centers are encouraged to develop guidelines to manage the potential urologic complications of these cases tailored to their resources (Taneja and Shah, 2017). This study aims to evaluate the timing of bladder dissection in caesarean section in patient with placenta accreta spectrum.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2026
ExpectedMay 4, 2025
April 1, 2025
1 year
April 26, 2025
April 26, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
o Blood loss
assessed by number of soaked towels and suction reservoir)
1 year
Study Arms (2)
group A
ACTIVE COMPARATOR40 patients will have bladder dissection at the start of caesarean section for patient with morbidly adherent placenta
group b
ACTIVE COMPARATOR40 patients will have bladder dissection after closing uterine incision and just before clamping uterine artery in case of caesarean hysterectomy
Interventions
All caesarean sections will be performed by a surgeon who has experience in performing caesarean hysterectomy in both groups. * Scrubbing the abdomen as usual. * Subumblical midline skin incision versus Pfannenstiel incision will be chosen according to site of the placenta and previous surgeries. * In group A careful bladder dissection will be done before uterine incision with ensuring hemostasis, uterine incision will be done above the placenta, after delivering the baby awaiting for placental separation if not proceeding for caesarean hysterectomy. * In group B uterine incision will be done above the placenta and after delivering the baby awaiting for placental separation if not proceeding to caesarean hysterectomy and dissecting bladder just before clamping uterine artery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women with BMI at or under 35kg/m2
- Women with history of at least previous two caesarean section
- Gestational age more than 32 weeks with viable fetus.
- Women with any degree of placenta previa.
- Women with placenta falling in the PAS.
- Willing and able to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- o History of urinary bladder injury.
- History of urinary or renal disorders
- Women with coagulation disorders or on anticoagulation therapy.
- Patients who are hemodynamically unstable before skin incision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Eller AG, Porter TF, Soisson P, Silver RM. Optimal management strategies for placenta accreta. BJOG. 2009 Apr;116(5):648-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02037.x. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
PMID: 19191778BACKGROUNDHoffman MS, Karlnoski RA, Mangar D, Whiteman VE, Zweibel BR, Lockhart JL, Camporesi EM. Morbidity associated with nonemergent hysterectomy for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;202(6):628.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.021.
PMID: 20510963BACKGROUNDJauniaux E, Collins S, Burton GJ. Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.067. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
PMID: 28599899BACKGROUNDMarshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;205(3):262.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
PMID: 22071057BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
khaled saed, professor
direcror
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2025
First Posted
May 4, 2025
Study Start
May 1, 2025
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 15, 2026
Last Updated
May 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share