Late-lumen Changes After Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in De Novo Coronary Lesions
LARGER-DCB
1 other identifier
interventional
256
1 country
9
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare late-lumen loss (LLL) between DCB and DES to treat de novo coronary artery stenosis by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Aug 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 18, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2028
September 3, 2025
September 1, 2025
2.4 years
April 24, 2025
September 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Late-lumen loss
Mean difference of late-lumen loss between DCB and DES in IVUS
9 months after last patient enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Minimal lumen diameter in QCA
9 months after last patient enrollment
% diameter stenosis in QCA
9 months after last patient enrollment
Minimal lumen diameter in IVUS
9 months after last patient enrollment
Cardiovascular death
1 year after last patient enrollment
All-cause death
1 year after last patient enrollment
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Drug-eluting stent
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn DES group, latest second-generation DES will be used in accordance with standard practice guideline.
Drug-coated balloon
EXPERIMENTALIn DCB group, commercially available DCB (Agent, Boston Scientific, USA) will be used. DCB angioplasty will be recommended as follows to fully optimized procedural results. First, DCB size should be 1:1 ratio with reference vessel size. Second, delivery time of DCB should be within 30 seconds. Third, total inflation time of DCB will be recommended from 30 to 60 seconds.
Interventions
IVUS (OPTICROSS, Boston Scientific, USA) will be recommended to select proper size of predilatation balloon (semi- or non-compliant balloon), DCB, or DES. Optimal lesion preparation is defined as satisfying all of the followings: 1) a fully inflated balloon of the correct size for the vessel (balloon with vessel ratio \>0.90); 2) ≤35% residual stenosis; 3) TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade 3; and 4) the absence of a flow-limiting coronary artery dissection.15 After successful lesion preparation, patients will receive either DCB or DES according to randomly allocated groups. In DES group, latest second-generation DES will be used in accordance with standard practice guideline.
IVUS (OPTICROSS, Boston Scientific, USA) will be recommended to select proper size of predilatation balloon (semi- or non-compliant balloon), DCB, or DES. Optimal lesion preparation is defined as satisfying all of the followings: 1) a fully inflated balloon of the correct size for the vessel (balloon with vessel ratio \>0.90); 2) ≤35% residual stenosis; 3) TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade 3; and 4) the absence of a flow-limiting coronary artery dissection.15 After successful lesion preparation, patients will receive either DCB or DES according to randomly allocated groups. In DCB group, commercially available DCB (Agent, Boston Scientific, USA) will be used. DCB angioplasty will be recommended as follows to fully optimized procedural results. First, DCB size should be 1:1 ratio with reference vessel size. Second, delivery time of DCB should be within 30 seconds. Third, total inflation time of DCB will be recommended from 30 to 60 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject must be at least 19 years of age
- Subject who is able to understand risks, benefits and treatment alternatives and sign informed consent voluntarily
- Patients with at least one lesion with greater than 50% diameter stenosis or fractional flow reserve ≤0.80 requiring revascularization in de-novo coronary artery of reference vessel size ≥3.0 mm
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unable to provide consent
- Patients with known intolerance to aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, or components of drug-eluting stents
- Patients with angiographic findings of 1) Left main coronary artery disease 2) In-stent restenosis is the cause of target lesion 3) Target lesion in bypass graft 4) True bifurcation lesion that requires upfront 2-stenting
- Patients who have non-cardiac co-morbid conditions with life expectancy \<1 year
- Patients who may result in protocol non-compliance (site investigator's medical judgment)
- Patients with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest
- Patients with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction \<30%)
- Patients with severe valvular heart disease requiring open heart surgery
- Pregnant or lactating women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
Kosin University Gospel Hospital
Busan, 49269, South Korea
Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital
Daegu, 42601, South Korea
Chonnam National University
Gwangju, 61469, South Korea
Jeonbuk National University Hospital
Jeonju, 54907, South Korea
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 06351, South Korea
Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital
Seoul, 07985, South Korea
Korea University Guro Hospital
Seoul, 08308, South Korea
Ulsan University Hospital
Ulsan, 44033, South Korea
Yeosu Jeil Hospital
Yeosu, 59677, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Young Joon Hong, MD, PhD
Chonnam National University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2025
First Posted
May 2, 2025
Study Start
August 18, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Last Updated
September 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- After publication of main paper.
- Access Criteria
- Executive Committee will discuss to share the de-identified data upon reasonable requests.
Yes After publication of main paper, de-identified data will be shared upon reasonable requests after discussion by Executive Committee.