NCT06953752

Brief Summary

I. Background Atrial fibrillation, a common type of arrhythmia, is often treated with radiofrequency catheter ablation, a minimally invasive procedure that helps restore a normal heart rhythm. While this surgery is typically performed under "light sedation" (where patients remain semi-awake) and allows for quick recovery, many patients still experience significant anxiety during the procedure due to pain, unfamiliar surroundings, or concerns about surgical risks. Research shows that anxiety not only makes people more sensitive to pain but can also trigger physical tension, irregular breathing, and even affect the precision of the surgeon's movements-potentially prolonging the procedure or increasing the risk of complications. Currently, hospitals primarily rely on sedatives and painkillers to ease patient discomfort. However, these medications may cause side effects like low blood pressure or slowed breathing, which can be particularly dangerous for older patients with heart conditions. As a safer alternative, non-drug approaches like music therapy are gaining attention. Studies suggest that listening to music can reduce anxiety and pain in other medical settings (such as during biopsies or pre-surgery preparation), likely because it helps the body relax, reduces stress hormones, or distracts the mind. Yet, there's limited evidence on whether music can provide similar benefits during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation, especially in helping patients maintain steady breathing. To address this gap, the present study aims to explore how music interventions affect anxiety, pain, and breathing stability in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Investigators hope this research will offer practical solutions to improve patient comfort, reduce reliance on medications, and enhance surgical safety, while also providing scientific support for expanding non-drug therapies in cardiac procedures. II. Study Purpose To evaluate whether music during atrial fibrillation catheter ablation helps reduce patients' anxiety and pain, stabilize breathing, and improve satisfaction for both patients and doctors while making the procedure more efficient. III. Study Design Prospective randomized controlled trial IV. Study Plan

  • First-time atrial fibrillation ablation patients (aged 18-80) following clinical guidelines.
  • Willing to participate and sign consent. Exclusion Criteria:
  • Mental health issues (e.g., anxiety requiring medication, sleep disorders).
  • Hearing loss, communication difficulties, or need for general anesthesia.
  • Prior heart surgeries or catheter ablation, complex heart anatomy, or recent pain/sedation medication use. Grouping: Patients split evenly into "music group" or "control group," based on atrial fibrillation type (persistent or paroxysmal).
  • Sample Size 60 patients/group (120 total) will be chosen.
  • Blinding
  • Patients and doctors know the group assignment (music or no music).
  • Researchers assessing pain/anxiety and statisticians are blinded.
  • Data Collected
  • Basic info (age, weight, education).
  • Health history (smoking, heart conditions, medications).
  • Atrial fibrillation details (type, duration).
  • Test results (e.g., heart size, kidney function).
  • Pain/Sedation Protocol
  • Light sedation with fentanyl (adjusted as needed).
  • Extra midazolam given if heart rhythm needs electric correction.
  • Ablation Procedure
  • For Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Isolate lung veins.
  • For Persistent atrial fibrillation: Extra ablation lines on heart walls.
  • Power and pressure settings vary by heart area to balance safety and effectiveness.
  • Music Intervention
  • Music Group: Patients pick preferred music (classical, pop, etc.) played at 50-60 dB during procedure.
  • Control Group:\*No music.
  • Outcomes Measured
  • Pain: Rated by patients post-surgery using a face-based scale.
  • Anxiety: Measured before and after surgery with a standard questionnaire. Secondary Outcomes:
  • Breathing Stability: Breathing rate, pauses, and patterns.
  • Procedure Efficiency: Surgery duration, X-ray time, success rate.
  • Complications: Bleeding, heart injury, stroke risk.
  • Drug Use: Amount of painkillers needed.
  • Satisfaction: Ratings from patients and doctors (1-5 scale).
  • Doctor Fatigue: Self-reported by surgeons.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
7mo left

Started Jul 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress64%
Jul 2025Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 21, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 1, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 6, 2025

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2026

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

July 10, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

April 21, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 6, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale Score

    Postoperative pain assessment is performed immediately following the ablation procedure using the modified Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (scored 0-10, where higher scores indicate greater pain intensity), with patients instructed to select the facial expression corresponding to their peak intraoperative pain experience.

    Immediately following the ablation procedure

  • State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)

    Anxiety levels are assessed using a shortened version of the original 20-item State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (the STAI-6, including three anxiety-present and anxiety-absent items, and each rated on a 4-point scale) at two time points: preoperatively (baseline) and immediately postoperatively (upon procedure completion).

    Preoperatively (baseline) and immediately postoperatively (upon procedure completion)

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Respiratory rate

    During the procedure

  • Respiratory interval variability

    During the procedure

  • Amplitude variability of respiratory waveform

    During the procedure

  • Apnea episodes

    During the procedure

  • Sample entropy of respiratory waveform

    During the procedure

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Total Procedure Time

    During the procedure

  • Total Fluoroscopy Duration

    During the procedure

  • Complications

    One month following the ablation procedure.

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Music intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

1. Intraoperative Analgesia and Sedation Protocol: The procedure is performed under conscious sedation using fentanyl (1 ug/kg loading dose post-transseptal puncture, then 1-2 ug/kg/h maintenance infusion titrated in 0.25 ug/kg/h increments). Midazolam 3-5 mg is administered for cardioversion with flumazenil reversal. 2. Ablation Protocol: Ablation is performed using EnSite/CARTO systems. Paroxysmal AF patients receive bilateral pulmonary vein isolation ± trigger ablation; persistent AF patients receive additional posterior wall box ablation. Endpoints include bidirectional PVI (20-min observation) and roof line block. Posterior wall ablation is optional due to esophageal risk. 3. Music Intervention: Music group patients select preferred genres (classical/pop/rock/jazz; classical default) delivered at 50-60 dB during the procedure.

Other: Music intervention

Control

OTHER

1. Intraoperative Analgesia and Sedation Protocol: The procedure is performed under conscious sedation using fentanyl (1 ug/kg loading dose post-transseptal puncture, then 1-2 ug/kg/h maintenance infusion titrated in 0.25 ug/kg/h increments). Midazolam 3-5 mg is administered for cardioversion with flumazenil reversal. 2. Ablation Protocol: Ablation is performed using EnSite/CARTO systems. Paroxysmal AF patients receive bilateral pulmonary vein isolation ± trigger ablation; persistent AF patients receive additional posterior wall box ablation. Endpoints include bidirectional PVI (20-min observation) and roof line block. Posterior wall ablation is optional due to esophageal risk. 3. Music Intervention: Controls receive no music.

Other: Control

Interventions

Music group patients select preferred genres (classical/pop/rock/jazz; classical default) delivered at 50-60 dB during the procedure.

Music intervention
ControlOTHER

Controls receive no music.

Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing first-time catheter radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation at our center according to guideline recommendations;
  • Aged 18-80 years;
  • Willing to participate in the study and providing signed informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Active psychiatric conditions necessitating pharmacotherapy;
  • Auditory/cognitive barriers to protocol compliance;
  • General anesthesia candidates;
  • Hybrid AF procedures (e.g., concomitant LAA occlusion);
  • Previous cardiac interventions;
  • Complex anatomies per preprocedural imaging (e.g., persistent left superior vena cava, cor triatriatum);
  • Recent (≤30 days) sedative/analgesic exposure."

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Shaoxing People's Hospital

Shaoxing, Zhejiang, 312000, China

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial FibrillationAgnosia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2025

First Posted

May 1, 2025

Study Start

July 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

July 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Locations