NCT06952738

Brief Summary

This study aims to improve how doctors diagnose infections in patients with broken bones around joint replacements. Currently, there are no clear guidelines to help determine when an infection is present, making treatment decisions difficult. By studying how often infections are found through lab tests and identifying factors that predict infection, the investigators hope to create better ways to diagnose and care for these patients.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
18mo left

Started Oct 2025

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress29%
Oct 2025Oct 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 23, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 1, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2025

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2027

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2027

Last Updated

December 22, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

April 23, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Periprosthetic fracturessynovial fluidprosthetic joint infections

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Culture Positivity Rates

    This outcome measure is the percentage of cultures that grow organisms among the population

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 14 days.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Rate of Complications

    From date of surgery to one year after the specific participant's surgery.

  • Culture Organisms

    From surgery date to 14 days after surgery.

  • Treatments Used

    From enrollment to one year after surgery.

Study Arms (1)

Periprosthetic Fractures

This group will be all patients enrolled in the study: they will all have periprosthetic hip or knee fractures.

Other: Not applicable- observational study

Interventions

The investigators are only looking to see the rate of positivity of the cultures as well as what the organisms that are found in the cultures are.

Periprosthetic Fractures

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

This population would include all consenting patients older than 18 years who present to the University of Chicago Medical Center with periprosthetic hip or knee fractures and will require operative management of the fracture or infection.

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients (\>18 years old) with periprosthetic fractures around primary or revision hip or knee arthroplasty
  • Patients requiring operative management for these fractures (fixation or revision arthroplasty)
  • Patients presenting to the University of Chicago Medical Center during two (2) year period (October 2025 to October 2027)

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing non-operative management for periprosthetic fractures
  • Any documented or reported history of past prosthetic joint infection of the involved joint
  • Sinus tract at the time of presentation at the involved joint

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Chicago Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (11)

  • Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, Higuera C, Della Valle C, Chen AF, Shohat N. The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1309-1314.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

    PMID: 29551303BACKGROUND
  • McArthur BA, Abdel MP, Taunton MJ, Osmon DR, Hanssen AD. Seronegative infections in hip and knee arthroplasty: periprosthetic infections with normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level. Bone Joint J. 2015 Jul;97-B(7):939-44. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B7.35500.

    PMID: 26130349BACKGROUND
  • Schinsky MF, Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep;90(9):1869-75. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01255.

    PMID: 18762646BACKGROUND
  • Shah RP, Plummer DR, Moric M, Sporer SM, Levine BR, Della Valle CJ. Diagnosing Infection in the Setting of Periprosthetic Fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):140-3. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.045. Epub 2016 Mar 17.

    PMID: 27067465BACKGROUND
  • Preston S, Somerville L, Lanting B, Howard J. Are Nucleated Cell Counts Useful in the Diagnosis of Infection in Periprosthetic Fracture? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jul;473(7):2238-43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4162-8.

    PMID: 25631172BACKGROUND
  • Chevillotte CJ, Ali MH, Trousdale RT, Larson DR, Gullerud RE, Berry DJ. Inflammatory laboratory markers in periprosthetic hip fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Aug;24(5):722-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.026. Epub 2008 Sep 11.

    PMID: 18789633BACKGROUND
  • Austin MS, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Lindsay A, Parvizi J. A simple, cost-effective screening protocol to rule out periprosthetic infection. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Jan;23(1):65-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.09.005.

    PMID: 18165031BACKGROUND
  • van den Kieboom J, Tirumala V, Xiong L, Klemt C, Kwon YM. Concomitant Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Periprosthetic Fracture: Diagnostic Utility of Serum and Synovial Fluid Markers. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):722-727. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.029. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

    PMID: 32893059BACKGROUND
  • Barberis L, Abdelrahman T, Driscoll DA, Dasci MF, Gehrke T, Citak M. Unexpected Positive Cultures in Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jul;39(7):1834-1839. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.030. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

    PMID: 38244640BACKGROUND
  • Shichman I, Roof M, Askew N, Nherera L, Rozell JC, Seyler TM, Schwarzkopf R. Projections and Epidemiology of Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Patients to 2040-2060. JB JS Open Access. 2023 Feb 28;8(1):e22.00112. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00112. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.

    PMID: 36864906BACKGROUND
  • Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected Volume of Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Sep 5;100(17):1455-1460. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01617.

    PMID: 30180053BACKGROUND

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

We will be collecting synovial fluid and tissue cultures from hips and knees with periprosthetic fractures and will be monitoring the cultures for 14 days.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Periprosthetic Fractures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fractures, BoneWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Sara Wallace, MD

    The University of Chicago Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Malik J Scott, BA

CONTACT

Vincent Buckman, BS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2025

First Posted

May 1, 2025

Study Start

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2027

Last Updated

December 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations