Assessing Acceptability and Feasibiity of STI Self-swab Testing, to be Offered at the Time of Telemed Medication Abortion Provision
STAMP
STI Self-swab Testing At the Time of Telemed Medication Abortion Provision
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this interventional study is to provide more access to STI testing for patients who seek abortion care through telemedicine, particularly for those whose access to STI testing is otherwise limited. The main questions it aims to answer are: What is the acceptability, feasibility, and utilization of self-collected STI screening at the time of telemedicine medication abortion provision? How does the uptake of such a service among patients receiving telemedicine abortion care compare to the population of patients who seek in-person medication abortion care? What are the positivity rates for STIs in among patients receiving telemedicine medication abortion care compared to the positivity rates for a contemporaneous, in-clinic population? What is the average time to between testing and treatment for patients who test positive for an STI using the self-collection service? Researchers will compare the intervention group to a contemporaneous, in-clinic population on uptake of STI screening, as well as on positivity rates for the STIs tested. Participants will be asked to perform self-swab collection for STI testing for gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomonas. They will be instructed to send their specimens to a lab using prepaid postage. Upon completion of sample collection and shipping, they will be asked to complete a survey assessing basic demographic information, as well as acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. Patients who test positive for an STI will be promptly provided/referred to treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 22, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
ExpectedJune 26, 2025
June 1, 2025
11 months
March 18, 2025
June 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Utilization of self-collected STI screening at the time of telemedicine medication abortion provision
Utilization rates will be reported as a percentage. Both enrollment in the study, as well as utilization of the actual STI testing services, will be reported as measures of utilization. The former (1) will be reported as the percentage of eligible patients who chose to enroll in the study, while the latter (2) will be reported as the percentage of enrolled patients who submitted samples for STI testing.
1) up to one year 2) up to one year
Acceptability of self-collected STI screening at the time of telemedicine medication abortion provision
Acceptability will be measured using a modified version of the Digital Health Acceptability Questionnaire (DHAQ) which is a validated survey that is used to assess acceptability and feasibility of telehealth-based interventions. The first five questions (1-5) are validated to assess attitude toward the service as a means to address healthcare needs, while the second five questions (6-10) address individual capacity and effort to use the telehealth intervention. A copy of this survey can be found in Table A. This is a 10 question survey of Likert scales from 1 to 5, with 1 being "Strongly Disagree" and 5 being "Strongly Agree". We will calculate median and IQR across the domains of the DHAQ to determine a median acceptability score, which will be calculated using the scores from questions 1-5.
Up to two weeks after completion of the intervention
Feasibility of self-collected STI screening at the time of telemedicine medication abortion provision
Feasibility will be measured using a modified version of the Digital Health Acceptability Questionnaire (DHAQ) which is a validated survey that is used to assess acceptability and feasibility of telehealth-based interventions. The first five questions (1-5) are validated to assess attitude toward the service as a means to address healthcare needs, while the second five questions (6-10) address individual capacity and effort to use the telehealth intervention. A copy of this survey can be found in Table A. This is a 10 question survey of Likert scales from 1 to 5, with 1 being "Strongly Disagree" and 5 being "Strongly Agree". We will calculate median and IQR across the domains of the DHAQ to determine a median acceptability score, which will be calculated using the scores from questions 6-10.
1) Up to two weeks after completion of the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of uptake and STI positivity rates between the telehealth and in-clinic population
up to one year
Time elapsed between test result and prescription for treatment for patients who have a positive test for STI
one week
Study Arms (2)
Self-swab Arm
EXPERIMENTALThese patients will be recruited to the study actively. Upon signing an informed consent, they will be instructed to collect an at-home, self-swab test for STI testing. The kit for collection will be provided for them, as well as the shipping materials for the specimen.
in-clinic STI testing arm
NO INTERVENTIONThis population will not be actively recruited. Demographic data will be collected for comparison to the intervention arm via retrospective chart review of a contemporaneous, in-clinic population seeking abortion care.
Interventions
Self-swab collection PCR test for chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomonas
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients of the Queen Medical Center Options Center clinic seeking telemedicine medication abortion.
- Patients for whom, according to the CDC guidelines for STI Testing11, STI testing is indicated, or patients who desire STI screening
- Age 14 and over
- Can speak and read English
- Displays capacity for informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Home address that is not located in the state of Hawai'i
- Incarcerated
- Unwilling to perform vaginal swab collection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Queen's Medical Centerlead
- University of Hawaii Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Queens Medical Center, 1004 Clinic POB1
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813, United States
Related Publications (19)
Gaydos CA, Cartwright CP, Colaninno P, Welsch J, Holden J, Ho SY, Webb EM, Anderson C, Bertuzis R, Zhang L, Miller T, Leckie G, Abravaya K, Robinson J. Performance of the Abbott RealTime CT/NG for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Sep;48(9):3236-43. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01019-10. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
PMID: 20668135BACKGROUNDUS Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention (NCHSTP), Division of STD/HIV Prevention, Sexually Transmitted Disease Morbidity for selected STDs by age, race/ethnicity and gender 1996-2014, CDC WONDER Online Database. Accessed 2025 Jan 7. http://wonder.cdc.gov/std-race-age.html.
BACKGROUNDThe Guttmacher Institute. State laws and policies: An overview of consent to reproductive health services by young people. Published 2023 Aug 30. Accessed 2024 Dec 26. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-minors-consent-law
BACKGROUNDCommittee Opinion No. 665: Guidelines for Adolescent Health Research. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;127(6):e183-e186. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001486.
PMID: 27214193BACKGROUNDHaydon HM, Major T, Kelly JT, Catapan SC, Caffery LJ, Smith AC, Gallegos-Rejas V, Thomas EE, Banbury A, Snoswell CL. Development and validation of the Digital Health Acceptability Questionnaire. J Telemed Telecare. 2023 Dec;29(10_suppl):8S-15S. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231202279.
PMID: 38007698BACKGROUNDTeresi JA, Yu X, Stewart AL, Hays RD. Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Feasibility Pilot Studies. Med Care. 2022 Jan 1;60(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001664.
PMID: 34812790BACKGROUNDSpielberg F, Levy V, Lensing S, Chattopadhyay I, Venkatasubramanian L, Acevedo N, Wolff P, Callabresi D, Philip S, Lopez TP, Padian N, Blake DR, Gaydos CA. Fully integrated e-services for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of sexually transmitted infections: results of a 4-county study in California. Am J Public Health. 2014 Dec;104(12):2313-20. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302302. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
PMID: 25320878BACKGROUNDSullivan SP, Sullivan PS, Stephenson R. Acceptability and Feasibility of a Telehealth Intervention for STI Testing Among Male Couples. AIDS Behav. 2021 Dec;25(12):4029-4043. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03173-4. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
PMID: 33507455BACKGROUNDLunny C, Taylor D, Hoang L, Wong T, Gilbert M, Lester R, Krajden M, Ogilvie G. Self-Collected versus Clinician-Collected Sampling for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Screening: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 13;10(7):e0132776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132776. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26168051BACKGROUNDCenter for Disease Control. Screening recommendations and considerations referenced in treatment guidelines and original sources. Published 2024 Mar 22. Accessed 2024 Oct 1. https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/screening-recommendations.htm
BACKGROUNDNorris A, Upadhyay U, O'Donnell J, et al. #WeCount report: April 2022 to June 2024. Society of Family Planning. Published 2024 Oct 22. doi:10.46621/728122kflzwf
BACKGROUNDKerestes C, Murayama S, Tyson J, Natavio M, Seamon E, Raidoo S, Lacar L, Bowen E, Soon R, Platais I, Kaneshiro B, Stowers P. Provision of medication abortion in Hawai'i during COVID-19: Practical experience with multiple care delivery models. Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.025. Epub 2021 Mar 28.
PMID: 33789080BACKGROUNDBarrow RY, Ahmed F, Bolan GA, Workowski KA. Recommendations for Providing Quality Sexually Transmitted Diseases Clinical Services, 2020. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020 Jan 3;68(5):1-20. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6805a1.
PMID: 31899459BACKGROUNDMcNicholas C, Madden T, Secura G, Peipert JF. The contraceptive CHOICE project round up: what we did and what we learned. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;57(4):635-43. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000070.
PMID: 25286295BACKGROUNDFrost JJ, Gold RB, Bucek A. Specialized family planning clinics in the United States: why women choose them and their role in meeting women's health care needs. Womens Health Issues. 2012 Nov-Dec;22(6):e519-25. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2012.09.002.
PMID: 23122212BACKGROUNDFrost JJ, Mueller J, Pleasure ZH. Trends and differentials in receipt of sexual and reproductive health services in the United States: services received and sources of care, 2006-2019. Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/sexual-reproductive-health-services-in-us-sources-care-2006-2019. Published 2021 Jun.
BACKGROUNDSrinivas M, Wong NS, Wallace R, Emch M, Tang W, Yang EJ, Tucker JD. Sexually Transmitted Infection Rates and Closure of Family Planning Clinics Because of Abortion Restrictions in Iowa. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2239063. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.39063.
PMID: 36239943BACKGROUNDBaden K, Dreweke J, Gibson C. Clear and growing evidence that Dobbs is harming reproductive health and freedom. Published 2024 Aug 22. Accessed 2024 Oct 1. https://www.guttmacher.org/2024/05/clear-and-growing-evidence-dobbs-harming-reproductive-health-and-freedom.
BACKGROUNDAbortion in the United States. Published 2024 Jun 25. Accessed 2024 Oct 1. https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2025
First Posted
April 30, 2025
Study Start
May 22, 2025
Primary Completion
April 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
June 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
individual participant data will be anonymized.