General Anesthesia vs Conscious Sedation for Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound
RESSOURCE
A Randomized Controlled Trial of gEneral aneStheSia vs consciOUs Sedation in Radial endobronChial Ultrasound for Peripheral Pulmonary lEsions
1 other identifier
interventional
306
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The endoscopic investigation of lung lesions is experiencing significant growth with the increasing number of lung cancer screening programs. Peripheral endobronchial ultrasound (pEBUS) is the most widely used endoscopic technique in the investigation of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPL). It is performed in relatively equal proportions under conscious sedation and general anesthesia by interventional pulmonologists throughout the world. Users of conscious sedation justify themselves by the fewer resources consumed and the absence of demonstration of a superior diagnostic yield of general anesthesia while users of general anesthesia claim diagnostic yield and comfort for the patient are superior with their approach. Our main objective is to compare the diagnostic yield of pEBUS under general anesthesia to that obtained under conscious sedation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2029
March 6, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.8 years
February 14, 2025
March 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic yield of pEBUS under general anesthesia and conscious sedation
The diagnostic yield of pEBUS according to a strict definition, a procedure being defined as diagnostic if it allows a specific benign or malignant diagnosis using the samples obtained. Non-specific findings not allowing a precise diagnosis and accompanied by a follow-up evolution consistent with the findings (e.g.: non-specific inflammation followed by spontaneous resolution of the lesion) will not be considered diagnostic. Cryobiopies will be excluded from the primary outcome as they cannot be safely performed under conscious sedation. We do not primarly aim to evaluate the added value of cryobiopsy but to compare two modalities of sedation. The comparison between the diagnostic yields for the two types of sedation will be made with a χ2 test, if the distribution of the data is normal
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Diagnostic yield of pEBUS
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)
Diagnostic yield of pEBUS
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)
Diagnostic yield of pEBUS
At recruitment completion (expected time 2 years)
Duration of the procedure
Assessment will begin with the start of the procedure (bronchoscope insertion) and end at procedure completion (bronchoscope removal)
Duration of the procedure
Assessment will begin when the participant enters the procedure room and end when he leaves it. Result will be recorded when the patient leaves the procedure room.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conscious sedation arm
EXPERIMENTALIn the conscious sedation group, the procedure will be performed through the nose or mouth at the discretion of the endoscopist. The patient will remain breathing spontaneously throughout the procedure and will be administered oxygen through a nasal cannula at an initial flow rate of 2L/min. A combination of propofol, fentanyl and midazolam boluses will be used to maintain moderate sedation. At IUCPQ-UL, fentanyl and midazolam will be used as in our routine practice. The boluses will be prescribed by a doctor experienced in conscious sedation (anesthesiologist, intensivist or pulmonologist) according to the patient's state of wakefulness assessed by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RAS) .Centers will decide, prior to initiating recruitment locally, the drug combination used to sedate patients and they will maintain the use of the same drug combination throughout the study.
General anesthesia arm
EXPERIMENTALIn the general anesthesia group, an endotracheal tube larger than 7 will be used. The patient will be kept non-arousable to non-nociceptive stimulation (RAS = -5) by a perfusion including, at the anesthesiologist's discretion: fentanyl, sufentanyl, remifentanyl, midazolam or propofol. The sedation of this group will not be protocolized given the wide variety of practices in the participating centers, but the targeted level of sedation will be and the medication administered will be adjusted according to this target. The RAS will be evaluated every 5 minutes, or earlier if signs of arousal are present, to ensure that the intended target is maintained and adjustments to the rate of infusions as well as boluses may be made/administered by the anesthesiologist to maintain the targeted level of sedation. Patients may be paralyzed at the discretion of the anesthesiologit. The ventilatory parameters will be standardized according to the VESPA protocol
Interventions
In the conscious sedation group, the procedure will be performed through the nose or mouth at the discretion of the endoscopist. The patient will remain breathing spontaneously throughout the procedure and will be administered oxygen through a nasal cannula at an initial flow rate of 2L/min. A combination of propofol, fentanyl and midazolam boluses will be used to maintain moderate sedation. At IUCPQ-UL, fentanyl and midazolam will be used as in our routine practice. The boluses will be prescribed by a doctor experienced in conscious sedation (anesthesiologist, intensivist or pulmonologist) according to the patient's state of wakefulness assessed by the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RAS) .Centers will decide, prior to initiating recruitment locally, the drug combination used to sedate patients and they will maintain the use of the same drug combination throughout the study
In the general anesthesia group, an endotracheal tube larger than 7 will be used. The patient will be kept non-arousable to non-nociceptive stimulation (RAS = -5) by a perfusion including, at the anesthesiologist's discretion: fentanyl, sufentanyl, remifentanyl, midazolam or propofol. The sedation of this group will not be protocolized given the wide variety of practices in the participating centers, but the targeted level of sedation will be and the medication administered will be adjusted according to this target. The RAS will be evaluated every 5 minutes, or earlier if signs of arousal are present, to ensure that the intended target is maintained and adjustments to the rate of infusions as well as boluses may be made/administered by the anesthesiologist to maintain the targeted level of sedation. Patients may be paralyzed at the discretion of the anesthesiologit. The ventilatory parameters will be standardized according to the VESPA protocol
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years and ability to consent
- Peripheral lung lesion less than 5cm in average diameter on axial CT images (A lung lesion will be considered peripheral if it is located beyond the origin of the subsegmental bronchi and presumed not to be visible endoscopically in white light during the evaluation of the CT scan by an interventional pulmonologist.)
- Lesion deemed accessible by pEBUS by an experienced interventional pulmonologist
- Decision by the medical team and the patient to use pEBUS as a diagnostic modality for the lung lesion
You may not qualify if:
- Planned use of electromagnetic navigation, augmented fluoroscopy or robotic bronchoscopy in addition to pEBUS. The use of virtual bronchoscopy planning is permitted
- Presence of suspicious lymph nodes (size ≥ 10mm and/or moderate or greater hypermetabolism) on imaging which are accessible by l-EBUS and for which rapid on-site cytological analysis will be used
- Contraindication to bronchoscopy or biopsies such as an unstable medical condition or uncorrected coagulopathy
- Current pregnancy
- Lack of free and informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The pathologist will be blinded when reviewing biopsy specimens.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2025
First Posted
April 30, 2025
Study Start
September 25, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2029
Last Updated
March 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03