Effectiveness of Large Language Model for Anaesthesia and Procedural Consent
PEAR
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Anaesthesia and Procedural Consent: A Comparative Analysis With Traditional Patient Consent Methods
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Patient understanding of anaesthesia risks remains inconsistent due to time constraints, language barriers, and variable clinician communication styles. Traditional verbal consent may not consistently ensure comprehension or reduce preoperative anxiety. PEAR (Patient Education of Anesthesia Risks) is a multilingual, AI-driven chatbot developed to enhance patient education and improve the quality of anaesthesia risk counselling. Study Objective: To compare PEAR's performance in delivering anaesthesia risk consent against the standard face-to-face verbal method.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 7, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 27, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 27, 2026
CompletedMay 7, 2026
April 1, 2026
4 months
April 22, 2025
April 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient self-reported understanding of anaesthesia risks
The primary outcome was assessed using a Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM) focused on subjective comprehension of anesthesia. This was measured via three validated 5-point Likert scale items (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) evaluating: (1) clarity of risks and procedures, (2) confidence in the anesthesia plan, and (3) self-reported ability to recall and explain key risks. While both groups completed these items following the clinician consultation, the intervention group underwent additional longitudinal assessments-at baseline and post-chatbot interaction-to facilitate a within-group analysis of the chatbot's independent educational impact.
Immediately post-interaction with the PEAR Chatbot
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Perceived Usefulness
Immediately pre-consent and post-consent (within the same clinic visit)
Cost effectiveness
Immediately post-chatbot use (same clinic visit)
Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU)
Immediately pre-consent and immediately post-consent (within the same clinic visit).
Attitude Toward Using (ATT)
Immediately pre-consent and immediately post-consent (within the same clinic visit).
Behavioral Intention to Use (BI)
Immediately pre-consent and immediately post-consent (within the same clinic visit).
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in the control arm will receive the standard anaesthesia risk counselling conducted face-to-face by a licensed anaesthetist. This process follows institutional protocols and includes a verbal explanation of anaesthesia procedures, associated risks, benefits, and potential complications, tailored to the patient's specific surgical context. Patients are encouraged to ask questions and engage in discussion during the session. No digital tools or chatbot assistance will be used in this arm.
PEAR
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will receive anaesthesia risk counselling through the PEAR (Patient Education of Anaesthesia Risks) chatbot, a multilingual, AI-powered conversational tool. The chatbot provides personalized education on anaesthesia risks, procedures, and post-operative expectations. Patients interact with the chatbot prior to meeting the anaesthetist, enhancing their understanding and preparing them for the face-to-face consultation.
Interventions
Participants in the intervention arm will receive anaesthesia risk counselling through the PEAR (Patient Education of Anaesthesia Risks) chatbot prior to their face-to-face consultation with an anaesthetist. PEAR is a multilingual, AI-powered conversational tool designed to provide personalized, interactive education on anaesthesia-related procedures, risks, and safety information. The chatbot delivers content aligned with institutional guidelines and allows patients to explore topics at their own pace, ask questions in natural language, and revisit information as needed. After completing the chatbot interaction, patients proceed with their standard preoperative consultation, where any further questions are addressed by the anaesthetist. This approach is designed to enhance patient understanding, reduce anxiety, and optimize the in-person consultation by preparing patients in advance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Adults (≥21 years old) undergoing elective surgery requiring anaesthesia
- Classified as ASA Physical Status I to III
- Able to provide informed consent
- Able to communicate effectively in English, Chinese (Mandarin), Malay, or Tamil
- Willing and able to complete questionnaires and interact with the PEAR chatbot (intervention arm)
You may not qualify if:
- ASA Physical Status IV or above
- Cognitive impairment or psychiatric conditions that may limit comprehension or communication
- Non-literate patients or those unable to understand English, Chinese, Malay, or Tamil
- Emergency surgery cases
- Prior participation in the study (to prevent bias)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, 249094, Singapore
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, 751126, Singapore
Related Publications (1)
Ke YH, Jin L, Elangovan K, Abdullah HR, Liu N, Sia ATH, Soh CR, Tung JYM, Ong JCL, Kuo CF, Wu SC, Kovacheva VP, Ting DSW. Retrieval augmented generation for 10 large language models and its generalizability in assessing medical fitness. NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 5;8(1):187. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01519-z.
PMID: 40185842BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- There will be no blinding of the participants and investigators due to the impracticality. The outcome assessor will be blinded.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2025
First Posted
April 29, 2025
Study Start
January 7, 2026
Primary Completion
April 27, 2026
Study Completion
April 27, 2026
Last Updated
May 7, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 1st July 2025 - 1st july 2028
- Access Criteria
- Access to de-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be granted to qualified academic researchers, healthcare professionals, or institutions conducting methodologically sound research that aligns with ethical standards and scientific purpose.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the publication (including primary and secondary outcomes, baseline characteristics, and questionnaire scores) will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. Data will be shared beginning 6 months after publication and will be accessible for up to 3 years post-publication. Requests must include a methodologically sound proposal and be submitted to the Principal Investigator. A data access agreement will be required to ensure ethical use and protection of participant confidentiality.