Combined Coronary CT Angiography and CT Perfusion in Coronary Artery Disease (CoroFusion)
1 other identifier
observational
2,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) provides high-resolution imaging of coronary artery disease (CAD), revealing stenosis, plaque characteristics, and hemodynamic markers like CT-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR), axial plaque stress (APS), and wall shear stress (WSS). However, CTA alone has limitations in evaluating the functional significance of lesions, especially in cases with borderline stenosis, severe calcification, or coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). CT myocardial perfusion (CTP) complements CTA by directly assessing myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR), enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Despite its promise, integrating CTA and CTP for comprehensive CAD assessment remains a challenge. Key gaps include the lack of long-term evidence on combined CTA/CTP findings, particularly in incorporating plaque markers with perfusion deficits. Standardizing ischemic thresholds and validating automated CTP analysis tools remain ongoing challenges. CTP also improves specificity in cases where CTA may overestimate ischemic burden and detects microvascular dysfunction, especially in patients with ischemia and no obstructive CAD (INOCA). Quantitative parameters like MBF have been linked to major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but issues with protocol variability and cost-effectiveness persist. This study, a real-world, single-center observational cohort, evaluates the clinical utility of integrated CTA/CTP imaging in CAD management. It will assess diagnostic synergy, impact on clinical decisions, and prognostic value in predicting 5-year MACE. AI-driven imaging analysis will quantify plaque features and myocardial perfusion defects, integrating multimodal parameters to generate individualized ischemia risk scores. The goal is to refine non-invasive diagnostic pathways and improve CAD management strategies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2025
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 9, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2034
April 29, 2025
February 1, 2025
5 years
February 9, 2025
April 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)
Composite endpoint including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for unstable angina, and unplanned coronary revascularization.
From enrollment to the follow-up of 5 year
Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined CTA/CTP vs. Invasive FFR/CFR
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detecting hemodynamically significant lesions (FFR ≤0.80 or CFR \<2.0 or stenosis \>90%).
30 days
Agreement Between CT-FFR and CTP Perfusion Metrics
Correlation between CT-FFR values and CTP-derived myocardial blood flow (MBF) or perfusion defect size.
30 days
Predictive Power of Combined Imaging Biomarkers for MACE
Hazard ratios (HRs) for MACE associated with:High-risk plaque (≥2 adverse features: low-attenuation plaque, positive remodeling, napkin-ring sign, spotty calcification). Perfusion deficit (MBF \<150 mL/100mL/min or MPR \<1.8). Combined high-risk plaque + perfusion deficit.
From enrollment to the follow-up of 5 year
Prognostic Utility of Peri-Coronary Fat Attenuation Index (FAI)
Association between elevated FAI (\>-70 HU) around stenotic lesions and MACE, adjusted for plaque burden and CTP parameters.
From enrollment to the follow-up of 5 year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Association Between Perfusion Recovery and Symptom Relief
From enrollment to the follow-up of 1 year
Dynamic Perfusion Changes in Microvascular Dysfunction
30 days
Sex-Specific Differences in Perfusion-Plaque Relationships
30 days
Impact of Severe Calcification on CTP Diagnostic Accuracy
30 days
Study Arms (2)
Conservative group
Patients do not undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and receive medical treatment, lifestyle interventions, or additional tests instead.
ICA group
Patients undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA), with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), or fractional flow reserve (FFR).
Interventions
Invasive coronary angiography (ICA), with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography (OCT), or fractional flow reserve (FFR).
Patients do not undergo invasive coronary angiography (ICA), recieving medical treatment, lifestyle intervention or further test
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with an indication for CTP
You may qualify if:
- Patients with an indication for CTP. Qualified patients who have signed a written informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 35%;
- Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction within 3 months or previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery;
- Planned coronary artery bypass graft surgery after diagnostic angiography;
- Poor quality of CTA/CTP or other reasons by core lab that are unsuitable for plaque, physiological or fat analysis;
- Contraindications for CT perfusion or coronary angiography;
- Coexisting conditions such as pregnancy, cancer, severe valvular heart disease, or liver/kidney dysfunction;
- Other diseases with a life expectancy of less than one year;
- Inability to sign informed consent or, in the researcher's judgment, poor compliance, making it unlikely the patient can complete the study as required.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200030, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 5 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 9, 2025
First Posted
April 29, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2034
Last Updated
April 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share