NCT06602583

Brief Summary

  1. 1.The patients suspected coronary artery disease or those needing an angiography as per the inclusion criteria would be included after a 2d echocardiography and treadmill test/ stress myocardial stress imaging (if indicated) after a written and informed consent.
  2. 2.Anthropometric and lab paraments would be recorded.
  3. 3.Study will have 2 arms. I. A study arm 1 - baseline comparative arm of patients having undergone angiography with standard dose/ old low dose angiography.
  4. 4.Post completion of the sample size the data of each angiographic view would be noted in both the study arms

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 17, 2024

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 19, 2024

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 20, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

September 17, 2024

Last Update Submit

September 18, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

coronary angiographycoronary artery diseaseradiation exposureDAPKAP

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To determine the difference in the radiation exposure levels received by patients undergoing diagnostic angiography with and without the new low dose exposure protocol

    Study aims to address the critical issue of radiation exposure in cardiology catheterization labs. By comparing the radiation dose received by patients undergoing diagnostic angiography with and without a new low dose exposure protocol, the study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of this protocol in reducing radiation exposure.

    Through study completion, and average of 06 monhts

Study Arms (2)

A study arm 1

baseline comparative arm of patients having already undergone angiography and fitting the inclusion criteria. The radiation exposure of this group would be collected from database of already done studies in the months prior to the initiation of the study (so as to prevent observer bias which may happen once the interventional cardiologist knows his inclusion in study, and may use a shorter or longer cine runs, thus influencing the outcomes). This would best represent the real-world data set, according to the routinely followed standard dose/ older low dose protocol.

Diagnostic Test: Standard Dose Coronary angiography

A study arm 2

a comparative arm where the patients being once eligible for the study; would undergo angiography using the new low dose protocol. A total of 5 to 8 different views (orthogonal) would be taken (2 for RCA and 4 to 6 for LAD/LCX)

Diagnostic Test: New low dose angiography

Interventions

The radiation exposure of this group would be collected from database of already done studies in the months prior to the initiation of the study (so as to prevent observer bias which may happen once the interventional cardiologist knows his inclusion in study, and may use a shorter or longer cine runs, thus influencing the outcomes). This would best represent the real-world data set, according to the routinely followed standard dose/ older low dose protocol.

Also known as: Standard Dose Angiography
A study arm 1

a comparative arm where the patients being once eligible for the study; would undergo angiography using the new low dose protocol.

A study arm 2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients undergoing diagnostic angiography (age ≥18 years) will be included in the study.

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients who qualify for a need of diagnostic angiography and are finally found to have normal epicardial coronaries, e.g.:
  • Pre aortic or mitral valve replacement angiography
  • TMT positive for inducible ischemia
  • SPECT MPI positive patients
  • Cradiologically symptomatic patients with ECG abnormalities, who cannot be subjected to stress test
  • High risk pre transplant patients

You may not qualify if:

  • Those who are unwilling for study
  • Patients who come with STEMI or NSTEMI

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

INHS Asvini

Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400005, India

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Picano E. Sustainability of medical imaging. BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):578-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.578.

    PMID: 15001510BACKGROUND
  • Padovani R, Le Heron J, Cruz-Suarez R, Duran A, Lefaure C, Miller DL, Sim HK, Vano E, Rehani M, Czarwinski R. International project on individual monitoring and radiation exposure levels in interventional cardiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011 Mar;144(1-4):437-41. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq326. Epub 2010 Nov 3.

    PMID: 21051431BACKGROUND
  • Stocker TJ, Abdel-Wahab M, Mollmann H, Deseive S, Massberg S, Hausleiter J. Radiation Dose in Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization: Results From the PROTECTION VII Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Sep 13;14(17):1958-1960. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.023. No abstract available.

    PMID: 34503751BACKGROUND
  • Tong J, Hei TK. Aging and age-related health effects of ionizing radiation. Radiat Med Prot [Internet]. 2020 Mar 1 [cited 2024 Sep 10];1(1):15-23. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666555720300058

    BACKGROUND
  • Kar S, Teleb M, Albaghdadi A, Ibrahim A, Mukherjee D. Efficacy of Low-Dose Compared With Standard-Dose Radiation for Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention (KAR RAD Study). J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Jun;31(6):187-194. doi: 10.25270/jic/18.00332. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

    PMID: 30865914BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Interventions

Coronary AngiographyAngiography

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cardiac Imaging TechniquesDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisRadiographyDiagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularHeart Function Tests

Study Officials

  • Dr Bharat S Sambyal, DM Card

    INHS Asvini

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Dr R Anathakrishnan, DM Card

    INHS Asvini

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Dr Bharat S Sambyal, DM Card

CONTACT

Dr R Anathakrishnan, DM Card

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2024

First Posted

September 19, 2024

Study Start

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion

February 28, 2025

Study Completion

April 30, 2025

Last Updated

September 20, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Locations