Comparison of T-loop vs Opus Loop in Canine Retraction Efficacy and Anchorage Loss Control
1 other identifier
interventional
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aim of this split-mouth randomized control trial is to compare the rate of canine retraction between the T loop and the Opus loop. The secondary objectives are to compare the angulation of the canine, changes in the first molar position in terms of anchorage loss, and molar rotation for the two loops used T-loop and Opus loop will be placed randomly on the right and left quadrants of patients for canine retraction and outcomes will be measured before and after completion of canine retraction
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 4, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 4, 2025
April 1, 2025
5 months
March 17, 2025
July 1, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of canine retraction
The rate of canine retraction will be calculated by "the amount of canine retraction (in millimeters) divided by the time interval". The amount of canine retraction will be assessed by measuring the distance from the canine cusp tip to the mesio-buccal (MB) cusp tip of the 1st molar with a calibrated caliper at the time of placement of loops and at every month by a single calibrated clinician. The duration will be measured as a time interval and each time interval will be 4 weeks.
From enrollment till end of treatment at 4 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in canine angulation at start of canine retraction and at the end of canine retraction
From enrollment till end of treatment at 4 months
Change in anchorage loss before and after completion of canine retraction
From enrollment till end of treatment at 4 months
Change in molar rotation at before and after completion of canine reatraction
From enrollment till end of treatment at 4 months
Study Arms (2)
Opus loop
ACTIVE COMPARATOROpus loop will be inserted from 1st molar to canine for canine retraction. it will be activated every month
T-loop
ACTIVE COMPARATORT loop will be inserted from 1st molar to canine for canine retraction. it will be activated every month
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 14 -40 years Extractions of maxillary 1st premolars Class 1, 1/4th, 1/2, and 3/4th unit Class II molar relation Presence of all teeth up to the second molar Good oral hygiene
You may not qualify if:
- Full cusp Class II Developmental, medical, or genetic problems Patient using bisphosphonates Spacing in dentition Grossly carious upper molars that cannot be restored Patient with active periodontal disease Severe crowding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bahria University Health Sciences
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2025
First Posted
April 25, 2025
Study Start
February 4, 2025
Primary Completion
July 1, 2025
Study Completion
July 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04