Effect of Dynamic Arterial Elastance and Assisted Fluid Management Software Guided Resuscitation in Septic Shock: Pilot Study
DAFM shock
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
3
Brief Summary
To investigate the benefit of using the AFM and Eadyn-guided fluid and vasopressor therapy in septic shock resuscitation for mechanically ventilated patients compared with the standard of care. The investigators hypothesize that using the AFM and Eadyn-guided fluid/vasopressor titration in septic shock patients who underwent mechanical ventilation might reduce the time to shock reversal.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 23, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 8, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 8, 2028
April 27, 2025
April 1, 2025
2 years
April 14, 2025
April 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
time to shock reversal
the time from diagnosis of septic shock until the achievement of sustained MAP of ≥65 mmHg with evidence of adequate tissue perfusion (continuation of urine flow ≥ 0.5 ml/kg/h or normalized or continuing decrease in serum lactate ≥10% from the previous value) without any vasopressor infusion
28 days
Secondary Outcomes (18)
a time-to-goal achievement for septic shock resuscitation
28 days
time to NE titrating
48 hours
maximum dose of vasopressors
48 hours
volume of fluid therapy during resuscitation
48 hours
fluid before randomization
48 hours
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
adverse event
28 days
Study Arms (2)
the standard of care group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe standard of care group will be treated according to according to septic shock guidelines 2021; In brief A vasopressor with optimal ideal fluid (at least 30 ml/kg) will be given to achieve the hemodynamic target (MAP ≥ 65 mm Hg) by fluid challenge technique guided by MAP and central venous pressure (CVP) changes after fluid challenge. Fluid-responsive tests can be used as a subsidiary, depending on the attending physician. Early Norepinephrine (NE) infusion can be used with a standard dose of 0.05 mcg/k/min and titrated at the rate of 0.01-0.02 mcg/kg/min every 10 min until 0.25 mcg/kg/min was achieved; then, the second line vasopressor will be added and adjusted to the target of vasopressor. Hydrocortisone can be given according to septic shock guidelines.
AFM and Eadyn - guided resuscitation group
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to this arm are treated with the standard of care for patients with septic shock as described for 'the standard of care' arm, along with the AFM and Eadyn - guided resuscitation group, as detailed under 'Interventions'
Interventions
A fluid challenge using a stroke volume change prediction (∆SVpredict) and Eadyn guide. If the ∆SVpredict is more than 10%, isotonic crystalloid of 500 ml will be administered in 30 minutes, and the machine's response will be awaited. If ∆SVpredict is still more than 10%, continuous fluid loading was reapplied until SVV was less than 10% (fluid therapy will be stopped if ∆SVpredict is less than 10%) and dynamic arterial elastance (EAdyn) reaches the goal of 0.8-1.0 along with a vasopressor will be administered and titrated every 10 minutes until the target MAP \> 65 mmHg is reached. After MAP of 65 achieved, tissue perfusion including urine output, capillary refill time, and serum lactate will be assessed
The standard of care group will be treated according to according to septic shock guidelines 2021; In brief A vasopressor with optimal ideal fluid (at least 30 ml/kg) will be given to achieve the hemodynamic target (MAP ≥ 65 mm Hg) by fluid challenge technique guided by MAP and central venous pressure (CVP) changes after fluid challenge. Fluid-responsive tests can be used as a subsidiary, depending on the attending physician. Early Norepinephrine (NE) infusion can be used with a standard dose of 0.05 mcg/k/min and titrated at the rate of 0.01-0.02 mcg/kg/min every 10 min until 0.25 mcg/kg/min was achieved; then, the second line vasopressor will be added and adjusted to the target of vasopressor. Hydrocortisone can be given according to septic shock guidelines. After MAP of 65 achieved, tissue perfusion including urine output, capillary refill time, and serum lactate will be assessed
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All Thai consecutive patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock in medical ICU, defined by clinically suspected or confirmed infection and MAP \<65 mmHg according to the criteria of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign 2021(11)with onset of shock in less than 24 hours.
- Already receiving or planning for mechanical ventilation
- Already receiving or planning for arterial catheter placement for invasive arterial pressure monitoring
- All patients will receive an echocardiogram with a cut point of LVEF \> 30% to be included in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Active, immediate, life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia, defined as ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation
- Acute cerebral vascular event, including both acute ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage
- Acute coronary syndrome
- cardiogenic shock, acute heart failure
- Severe asthma exacerbation
- Fluid intolerance: hypoxemia (P:F ratio \< 150)
- Life-threatening gastrointestinal hemorrhage
- Pregnancy
- Requirement for immediate surgery within 2 hours of randomization
- Advanced-stage cancer with predicted survival of less than 6 months
- Oliguric AKI with signs of volume overload
- Withdrawal or termination criteria
- The patient and legal representative request for withdrawal
- The attending physician requested a withdrawal
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
Related Publications (15)
Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel JF, Grelon F, Megarbane B, Anguel N, Mira JP, Dequin PF, Gergaud S, Weiss N, Legay F, Le Tulzo Y, Conrad M, Robert R, Gonzalez F, Guitton C, Tamion F, Tonnelier JM, Guezennec P, Van Der Linden T, Vieillard-Baron A, Mariotte E, Pradel G, Lesieur O, Ricard JD, Herve F, du Cheyron D, Guerin C, Mercat A, Teboul JL, Radermacher P; SEPSISPAM Investigators. High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 24;370(17):1583-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312173. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
PMID: 24635770BACKGROUNDEvans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, Machado FR, Mcintyre L, Ostermann M, Prescott HC, Schorr C, Simpson S, Wiersinga WJ, Alshamsi F, Angus DC, Arabi Y, Azevedo L, Beale R, Beilman G, Belley-Cote E, Burry L, Cecconi M, Centofanti J, Coz Yataco A, De Waele J, Dellinger RP, Doi K, Du B, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Gomersall C, Hodgson C, Hylander Moller M, Iwashyna T, Jacob S, Kleinpell R, Klompas M, Koh Y, Kumar A, Kwizera A, Lobo S, Masur H, McGloughlin S, Mehta S, Mehta Y, Mer M, Nunnally M, Oczkowski S, Osborn T, Papathanassoglou E, Perner A, Puskarich M, Roberts J, Schweickert W, Seckel M, Sevransky J, Sprung CL, Welte T, Zimmerman J, Levy M. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337. No abstract available.
PMID: 34605781BACKGROUNDMaheshwari K, Malhotra G, Bao X, Lahsaei P, Hand WR, Fleming NW, Ramsingh D, Treggiari MM, Sessler DI, Miller TE; Assisted Fluid Management Study Team. Assisted Fluid Management Software Guidance for Intraoperative Fluid Administration. Anesthesiology. 2021 Aug 1;135(2):273-283. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003790.
PMID: 33901281BACKGROUNDKelly RP, Ting CT, Yang TM, Liu CP, Maughan WL, Chang MS, Kass DA. Effective arterial elastance as index of arterial vascular load in humans. Circulation. 1992 Aug;86(2):513-21. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.86.2.513.
PMID: 1638719BACKGROUNDLai CJ, Cheng YJ, Han YY, Hsiao PN, Lin PL, Chiu CT, Lee JM, Tien YW, Chien KL. Hypotension prediction index for prevention of intraoperative hypotension in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial. Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 Jun 15;13(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00414-7.
PMID: 38879506BACKGROUNDDong S, Wang Q, Wang S, Zhou C, Wang H. Hypotension prediction index for the prevention of hypotension during surgery and critical care: A narrative review. Comput Biol Med. 2024 Mar;170:107995. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.107995. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
PMID: 38325215BACKGROUNDGuinot PG, Bernard E, Levrard M, Dupont H, Lorne E. Dynamic arterial elastance predicts mean arterial pressure decrease associated with decreasing norepinephrine dosage in septic shock. Crit Care. 2015 Jan 19;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0732-5.
PMID: 25598221BACKGROUNDMonge Garcia MI, Jian Z, Settels JJ, Hunley C, Cecconi M, Hatib F, Pinsky MR. Performance comparison of ventricular and arterial dP/dtmax for assessing left ventricular systolic function during different experimental loading and contractile conditions. Crit Care. 2018 Nov 29;22(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2260-1.
PMID: 30486866BACKGROUNDZhou X, Pan W, Chen B, Xu Z, Pan J. Predictive performance of dynamic arterial elastance for arterial pressure response to fluid expansion in mechanically ventilated hypotensive adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Jul 31;11(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00909-2.
PMID: 34331607BACKGROUNDKouz K, Monge Garcia MI, Cerutti E, Lisanti I, Draisci G, Frassanito L, Sander M, Ali Akbari A, Frey UH, Grundmann CD, Davies SJ, Donati A, Ripolles-Melchor J, Garcia-Lopez D, Vojnar B, Gayat E, Noll E, Bramlage P, Saugel B. Intraoperative hypotension when using hypotension prediction index software during major noncardiac surgery: a European multicentre prospective observational registry (EU HYPROTECT). BJA Open. 2023 May 4;6:100140. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100140. eCollection 2023 Jun.
PMID: 37588176BACKGROUNDMonge Garcia MI, Gil Cano A, Gracia Romero M. Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients. Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R15. doi: 10.1186/cc9420. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
PMID: 21226909BACKGROUNDHatib F, Jian Z, Buddi S, Lee C, Settels J, Sibert K, Rinehart J, Cannesson M. Machine-learning Algorithm to Predict Hypotension Based on High-fidelity Arterial Pressure Waveform Analysis. Anesthesiology. 2018 Oct;129(4):663-674. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002300.
PMID: 29894315BACKGROUNDMessmer AS, Zingg C, Muller M, Gerber JL, Schefold JC, Pfortmueller CA. Fluid Overload and Mortality in Adult Critical Care Patients-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):1862-1870. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004617.
PMID: 33009098BACKGROUNDPermpikul C, Tongyoo S, Viarasilpa T, Trainarongsakul T, Chakorn T, Udompanturak S. Early Use of Norepinephrine in Septic Shock Resuscitation (CENSER). A Randomized Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 May 1;199(9):1097-1105. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201806-1034OC.
PMID: 30704260BACKGROUNDAngus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 29;369(9):840-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208623. No abstract available.
PMID: 23984731BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 14, 2025
First Posted
April 22, 2025
Study Start
April 23, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 8, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 8, 2028
Last Updated
April 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share