The Effect of the Changes in Cylinder Power and Axis of Toric Soft Contact Lenses on the Visual Quality, Satisfaction and Vision Acceptability in Astigmatic Subjects
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Toric SCL combined spheric lens power with cylinder power and axis. However, in Indonesia, the availability of cylinder power and axis parameter variations between products are still narrow, with stock-keeping units (SKUs) options only between 0.75-2.75 DC and 10o-180o for power and axis, respectively. Providing accurate toric SCL prescription for astigmatism patient in Indonesia remains a challenge for ophthalmologists and generally could not be achieved. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effect of power undercorrection and axis misalignment on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, visual clarity, visual satisfaction, and vision acceptability. The inclusion criteria for the trial, include: (1) 20 to 40 years of age without the need for presbyopic correction, (2) mild to moderate myopia patients, sphere between -1.00 and - 6.00 D combined with cylinder between -0.75 to -3.00 DC in at least one eye, (3) corrected distance visual acuity (VA) of with Toric SCL 6/15 or better bilaterally. Exclusion criteria include: (1) a history of contact lens use 6 months prior to trial, (2) history of previous ocular surgery, (3) anterior and posterior segment abnormalities, (4) manifest strabismus or dry eye, and (5) ocular and systemic diseases that would preclude CL wear or decrease visual acuity; and pregnancy or lactation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 16, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 19, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2025
CompletedApril 22, 2025
April 1, 2025
26 days
April 20, 2025
April 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Visual acuity
Visual acuity was measured using Snellen chart and reported with logMAR
Week 1 and week 2
Contrast sensitivity was measured using Pelli-Robson chart,
Contrast sensitivity was measured using Pelli-Robson chart,
Week 1 and week 2
Monocular clarity
VAS (Visual Analog Scale, with 10 being the best indicator) was utilized to measure monocular clarity (1=blurred, 10=clear)
Week 1 and week 2
Visual satisfaction
VAS (Visual Analog Scale, with 10 being the best indicator) was utilized to measure visual satisfaction (1=satisfied, 10=unsatisfied)
Week 1 and week 2
Vision acceptability
VAS (Visual Analog Scale, with 10 being the best indicator) was utilized to measure vision acceptability (1=unacceptable, 10=perfectly acceptable).
Week 1 and week 2
Study Arms (2)
Undercorrection of toric soft contact lens
EXPERIMENTALA disposable toric lens investigated in this work is 2-Weeks Acuvue Moist for Astigmatism (2WAMfA), a common hydrogel conventional toric lenses.
Axis misalignment of toric soft contact lens
ACTIVE COMPARATORA disposable toric lens investigated in this work is 2-Weeks Acuvue Moist for Astigmatism (2WAMfA), a common hydrogel conventional toric lenses.
Interventions
The assessment visits interval is 1 week and completed exactly on day 14 after their first baseline visit. At each assessment visit, three different cylinder power were tested: 1) full cylinder power, 2) under-correction of cylinder power by 0.5 D, and 3) under-correction of cylinder power by 1.0 DC. Axis was also misaligned by -10° and +10° for each cylinder power alteration. The powers and axis assigned to the participants were randomized during every assessment visit. Baseline assessments and treatment allocations were masked to both patients and physician. All assessments were carried out on the day of observation and recorded on the subject evaluation sheet in accordance with the sample data, in which examinations results.
The assessment visits interval is 1 week and completed exactly on day 14 after their first baseline visit. At each assessment visit, three different cylinder power were tested: 1) full cylinder power, 2) under-correction of cylinder power by 0.5 D, and 3) under-correction of cylinder power by 1.0 DC. Axis was also misaligned by -10° and +10° for each cylinder power alteration. The powers and axis assigned to the participants were randomized during every assessment visit. Baseline assessments and treatment allocations were masked to both patients and physician. All assessments were carried out on the day of observation and recorded on the subject evaluation sheet in accordance with the sample data, in which examinations results.
The assessment visits interval is 1 week and completed exactly on day 14 after their first baseline visit. At each assessment visit, three different cylinder power were tested: 1) full cylinder power, 2) under-correction of cylinder power by 0.5 D, and 3) under-correction of cylinder power by 1.0 DC. Axis was also misaligned by -10° and +10° for each cylinder power alteration. The powers and axis assigned to the participants were randomized during every assessment visit. Baseline assessments and treatment allocations were masked to both patients and physician. All assessments were carried out on the day of observation and recorded on the subject evaluation sheet in accordance with the sample data, in which examinations results.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to 40 years of age without the need for presbyopic correction
- mild to moderate myopia patients, sphere between -1.00 and - 6.00 D combined with cylinder between -0.75 to -3.00 DC in at least one eye
- corrected distance visual acuity (VA) of with Toric SCL 6/15 or better bilaterally.
You may not qualify if:
- a history of contact lens use 6 months prior to trial
- history of previous ocular surgery
- anterior and posterior segment abnormalities
- manifest strabismus or dry eye
- ocular and systemic diseases that would preclude CL wear or decrease visual acuity; and pregnancy or lactation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Indonesia
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tri Rahayu, MD
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Indonesia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The participants, the ophthalmologist conducting the eye examinations, and the outcome assessors will be blinded to group allocation.
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ophthalmologist at the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Indonesia
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2025
First Posted
April 22, 2025
Study Start
November 16, 2020
Primary Completion
December 12, 2020
Study Completion
December 19, 2020
Last Updated
April 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Due to patient privacy and blinding method, IPD will not be shared.