Automatic and Conventional Methods of Hypertensive Patients Monitoring
Copmaring Automatic Blood Preesure Measurments To Conventional Office Readings For Monitoring Hypertensive Patients And Predicting Hypertention Mediated Organ Damage
1 other identifier
observational
620
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
comparing automatic blood pressure measurments methods with conventional office methods in follow up and monitoring of hypertensive patients and predicting hypertension mediated organ damage .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
April 16, 2025
April 1, 2025
1 year
March 25, 2025
April 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
predictive accuracy of automatic blood pressure measurments versus conventional office based measurments in identifying patient at risk of hypertension mediated organ damage [HMOD] .
this outcomes will be assessed by measuring systolic and diastolic blood pressure using both automated devices \[eg omron HEM -907\] and conventional manual sphygmomanometers in a seated postion ,after 5 minutes of rest .measurments will be taken in duplicate on two separate visits ,one week apart and the average readings will be used for analysis .the presence of HMOD will be evaluated through echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy \[LVH \] and microalbuminuria .correlation and predictive value \[ sensitivity , specificity\] will be calculated to compare both methods
over 6 months follow up period
Study Arms (2)
Group 1
this group use office conventional methods of blood pressure measurments 3 separate readings at different visits
group 2
divided into 2 groups 1. st group used home methods twice daily in morning and in evening using cuff digital machine 2. nd group use unattended automatic office blood pressure measurments in 3 readings
Interventions
measure arterial blood pressure by arm cuff devises
Eligibility Criteria
A calculated minimum sample of 620 male and female hypertensive patients aged more than 18 years old recruited from outpatient clinic of assiut cardiology departement will be randomly assigned 1:1 design.
You may qualify if:
- Patients who were screening for suspected hypertention or white coat hypertention .
- medically underserved population .
- primary arterial hypertention .
- high risk hypertensive patients \[resistant hypertension ,patients with poor medication adherance \]
You may not qualify if:
- patients with secondary causes of hypertention
- patients with other cardiac diseases \[heart faliure ,valvular heart diseases \]
- chronic illness affect blood pressure as chronic kideny disease .
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 25, 2025
First Posted
April 16, 2025
Study Start
October 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04