NCT06926686

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of two promising implants in treatment of lower eyelid retraction in 40 patients. This condition often resulting from injury, surgical complications, or thyroid eye disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: Which implant provides better long-term stability of the eyelid malposition? Does one implant minimize complications and improve patient outcomes more effectively than the other? This study will compare the use of donor sclera implants to a cellular dermal matrix to see if either offers superior results in terms of reducing graft shrinkage and improving eyelid positioning. Participants will: Undergo lower eyelid reconstruction surgery with one of the two implants. Be monitored for postoperative outcomes, including eyelid position, recurrence rates, and complications over a follow-up period 6 months.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
69mo left

Started Jan 2025

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress19%
Jan 2025Jan 2032

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 11, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 14, 2025

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2030

Expected
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2032

Last Updated

April 17, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

April 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 14, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

eyelid malposition

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Medial reflex distance 2

    Number of patients with ≥ 1 mm reduction in medial reflex distance 2

    From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Vertical eyelid aperture

    From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

  • Scleral show

    From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

  • Lagophthalmos

    From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

  • Oxford staining scale

    From baseline to 6 months follow-up.

Study Arms (2)

Autologous tarsus

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Surgical implantation to elongate the lower eyelid

Procedure: Autologous tarsus

A cellular dermal matrix (Permacol)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Surgical implantation to elongate the lower eyelid

Procedure: Acellular dermal matrix

Interventions

Surgical implantation of autologous tarsus to the lower eyelid

Autologous tarsus

Surgical implantation of acellular dermal matrix to the lower eyelid

A cellular dermal matrix (Permacol)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients aged 18-75 years.
  • Grade 2 or higher lower eyelid retraction (according to the retraction grading scale).
  • Candidate for surgical correction due to functional or cosmetic reasons.
  • Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Active ocular or eyelid infection.
  • History of severe scarring or keloid formation.
  • Concurrent orbital or eyelid malignancies. Pregnancy or lactation. Uncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes, immune disorders). Previous eyelid surgery on the affected eye.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Haukeland University Hospital

Bergen, Vetslandet, 5021, Norway

RECRUITING

Related Publications (5)

  • Ferri M, Oestreicher JH. Treatment of post-blepharoplasty lower lid retraction by free tarsoconjunctival grafting. Orbit. 2002 Dec;21(4):281-8. doi: 10.1076/orbi.21.4.281.8555.

  • Tao JP, Aakalu VK, Wladis EJ, Sobel RK, Freitag SK, Foster JA, Yen MT. Bioengineered Acellular Dermal Matrix Spacer Grafts for Lower Eyelid Retraction Repair: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2020 May;127(5):689-695. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.011. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

  • Park E, Lewis K, Alghoul MS. Comparison of Efficacy and Complications Among Various Spacer Grafts in the Treatment of Lower Eyelid Retraction: A Systematic Review. Aesthet Surg J. 2017 Jul 1;37(7):743-754. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx003.

  • Zucal I, Waldner M, Shojaati G, Schweizer R, Klein HJ, Giovanoli P, Plock JA. Burn Scar Ectropion Correction: Surgical Technique for Functional Outcomes. Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Mar 1;88(3):271-276. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003047.

  • Osaki TH, Monteiro LG, Osaki MH. Management of eyelid retraction related to thyroid eye disease. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 14;12(1):12-21. doi: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_57_21. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar.

Study Officials

  • Hans Olav Ueland, MD, PhD

    Haukeland University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Hans Olav Ueland, MD, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Non-masked prospective randomized two-armed interventinal study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2025

First Posted

April 14, 2025

Study Start

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2032

Last Updated

April 17, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared outside the study group because concent is not obtained to share personal data.

Locations