NCT06302387

Brief Summary

This study looks at two ways to make gums thicker and bones stable around dental implants for people with thin gums. It compares two methods in 40 people: one method uses a special graft, and the other uses a technique called tenting. The goal is to see which method might work better for making the gums and bones around implants healthier. The check-ups are planned when the implant is put in and again after one year. The study focuses on how these methods are done without talking about what the results are.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2018

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2020

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 21, 2024

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 8, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 8, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

February 21, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 4, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

dental implantphenotypemucosal tissuesmucosal tissue augmentationvertical soft tissue heightbone resorptionbone remodeling

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Crestal Bone Levels

    Assessment of changes in crestal bone level (CBL)

    Baseline - 1year follow up

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Vertical soft tissue thickness

    Measured from before implant placement to implant uncovering at 2 months

  • PPD

    Baseline - 1year follow up

  • BOP

    Baseline - 1year follow up

  • PI

    Baseline - 1year follow up

Study Arms (2)

Acellular Dermal Matrix

EXPERIMENTAL

This group received vertical soft tissue thickness augmentation using an acellular dermal matrix.

Procedure: Acellular Dermal Matrix

Soft Tissue Expansion using Tenting Technique

EXPERIMENTAL

This group underwent soft tissue expansion using a tenting technique with a submerged healing abutment.

Procedure: Soft Tissue Expansion using Tenting Technique

Interventions

The ADM arm involved vertical soft tissue augmentation using an acellular dermal matrix. This process included the placement of a porcine dermal collagen graft (Mucoderm®, Institut Straumann AG, Switzerland) atop the dental implant site. The graft, measuring 15x20 mm, was hydrated in a 0.5% Metronidazole solution for 20 minutes before application, then trimmed and placed to extend 10 by 5 mm beyond the implant margins in both buccal and lingual directions. The primary wound closure was achieved using double mattress suturing with 6-0 Prolene (Ethicon, USA).

Acellular Dermal Matrix

The Tenting Technique arm involved soft tissue expansion using a submerged healing abutment to promote soft tissue growth. After implant placement, 2 mm healing abutments were set on the implants. Flaps were mobilized using vertical releasing incisions, and tension-free wound closure was achieved with horizontal mattress sutures followed by suturing the incision line with interrupted sutures for primary and submerged healing. This method aimed to create a subepithelial healing space for soft tissue expansion and augmentation.

Soft Tissue Expansion using Tenting Technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male and female patients between 18-75 years old.
  • Physical and psychological capacity to undergo implant therapy (ASA I or II).
  • Fully healed single mandibular posterior treatment sites (premolars or molars) being edentulous for at least 3 months.
  • Minimum of 6 mm width and 8 mm height native bone ridge.
  • No requirement for concomitant or a history of regenerative treatments.
  • Minimum of 4mm keratinized mucosa at the implant site (2 mm buccal and 2mm lingual).
  • Healthy non-inflamed keratinized soft tissues with a maximum soft tissue thickness height of 2 mm measured at crestal buccal and lingual aspects.
  • Periodontally healthy by fulfilling all of the following criteria: Full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) \< 20%, Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) \< 15%, Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN) \< 2.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a history of periodontitis.
  • Poor oral hygiene after Oral Hygiene Instructions (OHI).
  • Pregnant or lactating.
  • Uncontrolled concomitant medical diseases, e.g., diabetes.
  • Receiving or having received pharmacological treatment affecting wound healing within 3 months prior to the study-related intervention.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

VIC Clinic

Vilnius, 01362, Lithuania

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Linkevicius T, Linkevicius R, Alkimavicius J, Linkeviciene L, Andrijauskas P, Puisys A. Influence of titanium base, lithium disilicate restoration and vertical soft tissue thickness on bone stability around triangular-shaped implants: A prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jul;29(7):716-724. doi: 10.1111/clr.13263. Epub 2018 May 31.

  • Sculean A, Gruber R, Bosshardt DD. Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Apr;41 Suppl 15:S6-22. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12206.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Bone Resorption

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
double-blind, where neither the patients nor the clinicians responsible for treatment know the specific treatment modality
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The interventional study model for this trial is a two-arm, double-blind, randomized, prospective controlled clinical trial.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor and Chair Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2024

First Posted

March 8, 2024

Study Start

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion

April 1, 2020

Study Completion

February 1, 2023

Last Updated

March 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

We plan to make de-identified individual participant data (IPD) from our study on dental implant techniques available to other researchers upon request.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR

Locations