TeamBirth-SWE - a Care Process to Improve Safe and Person-centered Intrapartum Care
TeamBirth - an Intervention to Improve Patient Safety and Person-centered Care During Childbirth
2 other identifiers
observational
800,000
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this project is to enhance understanding of intrapartum patient safety and person-centered care through the evaluation of an intervention designed to improve team communication and patient involvement during childbirth, thereby positively impacting maternal and infant health. Despite various efforts to improve safety in intrapartum care, women and their infants are still harmed. Most adverse events within intrapartum care stem from communication and teamwork failures. Despite national and international recommendations, few interventions target patient safety by incorporating person-centered care. This project will investigate the effectiveness and implementation of the TeamBirth care process developed by Ariadne Labs Boston, U.S. to improve communication and teamwork among caregivers and women during childbirth. The Swedish version of this care process (TeamBirth-SWE) was adapted, tested, and piloted at Karolinska University Hospital during 2021. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that the TeamBirth-SWE intervention will have a positive impact on interprofessional teamwork, communication, information sharing, patient involvement, and shared decision-making during labor and birth. These improvements are expected to result in improved maternal and infant outcomes, process measures i.e., patient safety climate, interprofessional collaboration, and improved patient reported measures such as patient involvement, shared-decision-making, and satisfaction with care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2024
Longer than P75 for all trials
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 13, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 5, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2029
April 13, 2025
March 1, 2025
4.6 years
March 26, 2025
April 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Birth without major interventions or complications
The primary outcome is a composite measure including provided by the Swedish Pregnancy register and includes the following variables: no operative birth, no postpartum haemorrhage (\>1000 ml), no severe perineal trauma, and a 5-minute Apgar score \>=7.
From labor ward admission to discharge home, to 4 hours postpartum.
Shared intrapartum decision-making
Were you involved in planning and decision-making to your desired extent? Likert type question in the Swedish National Pregnancy Survey
PREM data collected 8 weeks after birth
Secondary Outcomes (23)
Unplanned cesarean section
At delivery/birth
Spontaneous vaginal birth
From labour onset to birth of the baby
Instrumental birth
From labour onset to instrumental birth performed
Postpartum bleeding
From brith of the baby to 4 hours after birth
Severe perineal trauma
Diagnosed at birth to 24 hours after birth
- +18 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
The intervention consists of the entire care team conducting huddles together with the birthing woman and her partner to plan the care, using the S-TeamBirth whiteboard to communicate and visualize decisions
Involving the entire care team including the woman and her partner in planning the care using team huddles and the S-TeamBirth whiteboard
Eligibility Criteria
The study population consist of all women who fulfill the inclusion criteria at the participating labor wards.
You may qualify if:
- Spontaneous onset of labor
- Induction of labort
- Gestational week \>22+0
You may not qualify if:
- Planned cesarean section
- Intrauterine Fetal Demise
- Gestational week \<22+0, .
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Karolinska Institutetlead
- Uppsala University Hospitalcollaborator
- Region Skanecollaborator
- Region Hallandcollaborator
- Region Jämtland Härjedalencollaborator
- Ariadne Labscollaborator
- Värmland County Council, Swedencollaborator
- Region Stockholmcollaborator
Study Sites (7)
Region Halland, labour ward Halmstad, Halmstad Hospital
Halmstad, Halland County, Sweden
Region Halland, labour ward Varberg County Hospital
Varberg, Halland County, Sweden
Department of Women's Health, Labour ward Östersund County Hospital
Östersund, Region Jämtland Härjedalen, Sweden
Region Skåne, labour wards Lund & Malmö
Lund, Skåne County, Sweden
Department of Women's Health, labour ward Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala, Uppsala County, Sweden
Department of Women's Health, Labour ward Karlstad County Hospital
Karlstad, Värmland County, Sweden
Department of Women's Health, Labour ward Solna & Huddinge, Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, 186 43, Sweden
Related Publications (17)
Aibar L, Rabanaque MJ, Aibar C, Aranaz JM, Mozas J. Patient safety and adverse events related with obstetric care. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Apr;291(4):825-30. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3474-3. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
PMID: 25245667BACKGROUNDSkoogh A, Hall-Lord ML, Baath C, Bojo AS. Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 14;21(1):1093. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07109-5.
PMID: 34649538BACKGROUNDDencker A, Nilsson C, Begley C, Jangsten E, Mollberg M, Patel H, Wigert H, Hessman E, Sjoblom H, Sparud-Lundin C. Causes and outcomes in studies of fear of childbirth: A systematic review. Women Birth. 2019 Apr;32(2):99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
PMID: 30115515BACKGROUNDHill MG, Reed KL, Brown RN; Newborn Brain Society Guidelines and Publications Committee. Perinatal asphyxia from the obstetric standpoint. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Aug;26(4):101259. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2021.101259. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
PMID: 34175240BACKGROUNDKurinczuk JJ, White-Koning M, Badawi N. Epidemiology of neonatal encephalopathy and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Early Hum Dev. 2010 Jun;86(6):329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.05.010. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
PMID: 20554402BACKGROUNDWu M, Tang J, Etherington C, Walker M, Boet S. Interventions for improving teamwork in intrapartem care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan;29(1):77-85. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009689. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
PMID: 31601734BACKGROUNDLiberati EG, Tarrant C, Willars J, Draycott T, Winter C, Kuberska K, Paton A, Marjanovic S, Leach B, Lichten C, Hocking L, Ball S, Dixon-Woods M; SCALING Authorship Group. Seven features of safety in maternity units: a framework based on multisite ethnography and stakeholder consultation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Jun;30(6):444-456. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010988. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
PMID: 32978322BACKGROUNDAggarwal R, Plough A, Henrich N, Galvin G, Rucker A, Barnes C, Berry W, Golen T, Shah NT. The design of "TeamBirth": A care process to improve communication and teamwork during labor. Birth. 2021 Dec;48(4):534-540. doi: 10.1111/birt.12566. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
PMID: 34245054BACKGROUNDWeiseth A, Plough A, Aggarwal R, Galvin G, Rucker A, Henrich N, Miller K, Subramanian L, Hawrusik R, Berry W, Gullo S, Spigel L, Dever K, Loveless D, Graham K, Paek B, Shah NT. Improving communication and teamwork during labor: A feasibility, acceptability, and safety study. Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):637-647. doi: 10.1111/birt.12630. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
PMID: 35233810BACKGROUNDNeergheen VL, Chaer LE, Plough A, Curtis E, Paterson VJ, Short T, Bright A, Lipsitz S, Murphy A, Miller K, Subramanian L, Radichel E, Ervin J, Castleman L, Brown E, Yeboah T, Simas TM, Terk D, Vedam S, Shah N, Weiseth A. Assessing patient autonomy in the context of TeamBirth, a quality improvement intervention to improve shared decision-making during labor and birth. Birth. 2024 Dec;51(4):855-866. doi: 10.1111/birt.12857. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
PMID: 39140579BACKGROUNDBernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.
PMID: 27283160BACKGROUNDVedam S, Stoll K, Rubashkin N, Martin K, Miller-Vedam Z, Hayes-Klein H, Jolicoeur G; CCinBC Steering Council. The Mothers on Respect (MOR) index: measuring quality, safety, and human rights in childbirth. SSM Popul Health. 2017 Jan 19;3:201-210. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.01.005. eCollection 2017 Dec.
PMID: 29349217BACKGROUNDVedam S, Stoll K, Taiwo TK, Rubashkin N, Cheyney M, Strauss N, McLemore M, Cadena M, Nethery E, Rushton E, Schummers L, Declercq E; GVtM-US Steering Council. The Giving Voice to Mothers study: inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States. Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 11;16(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2.
PMID: 31182118BACKGROUNDWalker KF, Dencker A, Thornton JG. Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Oct 3;5:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097. eCollection 2020 Jan.
PMID: 32021972BACKGROUNDWaterson P, Carman EM, Manser T, Hammer A. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):e026896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026896.
PMID: 31488465BACKGROUNDTilden VP, Eckstrom E, Dieckmann NF. Development of the assessment for collaborative environments (ACE-15): A tool to measure perceptions of interprofessional "teamness". J Interprof Care. 2016 May;30(3):288-94. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1137891. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
PMID: 27029641BACKGROUNDFord E, Ayers S, Wright DB. Measurement of maternal perceptions of support and control in birth (SCIB). J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Feb;18(2):245-52. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0882.
PMID: 19183096BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Target Duration
- 2 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Registered Nurse Midwife, Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 26, 2025
First Posted
April 13, 2025
Study Start
February 5, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 5, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2029
Last Updated
April 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03