NCT06926504

Brief Summary

The primary objective of this project is to enhance understanding of intrapartum patient safety and person-centered care through the evaluation of an intervention designed to improve team communication and patient involvement during childbirth, thereby positively impacting maternal and infant health. Despite various efforts to improve safety in intrapartum care, women and their infants are still harmed. Most adverse events within intrapartum care stem from communication and teamwork failures. Despite national and international recommendations, few interventions target patient safety by incorporating person-centered care. This project will investigate the effectiveness and implementation of the TeamBirth care process developed by Ariadne Labs Boston, U.S. to improve communication and teamwork among caregivers and women during childbirth. The Swedish version of this care process (TeamBirth-SWE) was adapted, tested, and piloted at Karolinska University Hospital during 2021. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that the TeamBirth-SWE intervention will have a positive impact on interprofessional teamwork, communication, information sharing, patient involvement, and shared decision-making during labor and birth. These improvements are expected to result in improved maternal and infant outcomes, process measures i.e., patient safety climate, interprofessional collaboration, and improved patient reported measures such as patient involvement, shared-decision-making, and satisfaction with care.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
800,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
45mo left

Started Feb 2024

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

7 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress38%
Feb 2024Dec 2029

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 5, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 26, 2025

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 13, 2025

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 5, 2028

Expected
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2029

Last Updated

April 13, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

March 26, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

person-centered careintrapartum patient safety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Birth without major interventions or complications

    The primary outcome is a composite measure including provided by the Swedish Pregnancy register and includes the following variables: no operative birth, no postpartum haemorrhage (\>1000 ml), no severe perineal trauma, and a 5-minute Apgar score \>=7.

    From labor ward admission to discharge home, to 4 hours postpartum.

  • Shared intrapartum decision-making

    Were you involved in planning and decision-making to your desired extent? Likert type question in the Swedish National Pregnancy Survey

    PREM data collected 8 weeks after birth

Secondary Outcomes (23)

  • Unplanned cesarean section

    At delivery/birth

  • Spontaneous vaginal birth

    From labour onset to birth of the baby

  • Instrumental birth

    From labour onset to instrumental birth performed

  • Postpartum bleeding

    From brith of the baby to 4 hours after birth

  • Severe perineal trauma

    Diagnosed at birth to 24 hours after birth

  • +18 more secondary outcomes

Interventions

The intervention consists of the entire care team conducting huddles together with the birthing woman and her partner to plan the care, using the S-TeamBirth whiteboard to communicate and visualize decisions

S-TeamBirthBEHAVIORAL

Involving the entire care team including the woman and her partner in planning the care using team huddles and the S-TeamBirth whiteboard

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

The study population consist of all women who fulfill the inclusion criteria at the participating labor wards.

You may qualify if:

  • Spontaneous onset of labor
  • Induction of labort
  • Gestational week \>22+0

You may not qualify if:

  • Planned cesarean section
  • Intrauterine Fetal Demise
  • Gestational week \<22+0, .

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (7)

Region Halland, labour ward Halmstad, Halmstad Hospital

Halmstad, Halland County, Sweden

RECRUITING

Region Halland, labour ward Varberg County Hospital

Varberg, Halland County, Sweden

RECRUITING

Department of Women's Health, Labour ward Östersund County Hospital

Östersund, Region Jämtland Härjedalen, Sweden

RECRUITING

Region Skåne, labour wards Lund & Malmö

Lund, Skåne County, Sweden

RECRUITING

Department of Women's Health, labour ward Uppsala University Hospital

Uppsala, Uppsala County, Sweden

RECRUITING

Department of Women's Health, Labour ward Karlstad County Hospital

Karlstad, Värmland County, Sweden

RECRUITING

Department of Women's Health, Labour ward Solna & Huddinge, Karolinska University Hospital

Stockholm, 186 43, Sweden

RECRUITING

Related Publications (17)

  • Aibar L, Rabanaque MJ, Aibar C, Aranaz JM, Mozas J. Patient safety and adverse events related with obstetric care. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Apr;291(4):825-30. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3474-3. Epub 2014 Sep 23.

    PMID: 25245667BACKGROUND
  • Skoogh A, Hall-Lord ML, Baath C, Bojo AS. Adverse events in women giving birth in a labor ward: a retrospective record review study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 14;21(1):1093. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07109-5.

    PMID: 34649538BACKGROUND
  • Dencker A, Nilsson C, Begley C, Jangsten E, Mollberg M, Patel H, Wigert H, Hessman E, Sjoblom H, Sparud-Lundin C. Causes and outcomes in studies of fear of childbirth: A systematic review. Women Birth. 2019 Apr;32(2):99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

    PMID: 30115515BACKGROUND
  • Hill MG, Reed KL, Brown RN; Newborn Brain Society Guidelines and Publications Committee. Perinatal asphyxia from the obstetric standpoint. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Aug;26(4):101259. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2021.101259. Epub 2021 Jun 11.

    PMID: 34175240BACKGROUND
  • Kurinczuk JJ, White-Koning M, Badawi N. Epidemiology of neonatal encephalopathy and hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy. Early Hum Dev. 2010 Jun;86(6):329-38. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.05.010. Epub 2010 Jun 16.

    PMID: 20554402BACKGROUND
  • Wu M, Tang J, Etherington C, Walker M, Boet S. Interventions for improving teamwork in intrapartem care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Jan;29(1):77-85. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009689. Epub 2019 Oct 10.

    PMID: 31601734BACKGROUND
  • Liberati EG, Tarrant C, Willars J, Draycott T, Winter C, Kuberska K, Paton A, Marjanovic S, Leach B, Lichten C, Hocking L, Ball S, Dixon-Woods M; SCALING Authorship Group. Seven features of safety in maternity units: a framework based on multisite ethnography and stakeholder consultation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Jun;30(6):444-456. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010988. Epub 2020 Sep 25.

    PMID: 32978322BACKGROUND
  • Aggarwal R, Plough A, Henrich N, Galvin G, Rucker A, Barnes C, Berry W, Golen T, Shah NT. The design of "TeamBirth": A care process to improve communication and teamwork during labor. Birth. 2021 Dec;48(4):534-540. doi: 10.1111/birt.12566. Epub 2021 Jul 9.

    PMID: 34245054BACKGROUND
  • Weiseth A, Plough A, Aggarwal R, Galvin G, Rucker A, Henrich N, Miller K, Subramanian L, Hawrusik R, Berry W, Gullo S, Spigel L, Dever K, Loveless D, Graham K, Paek B, Shah NT. Improving communication and teamwork during labor: A feasibility, acceptability, and safety study. Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):637-647. doi: 10.1111/birt.12630. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

    PMID: 35233810BACKGROUND
  • Neergheen VL, Chaer LE, Plough A, Curtis E, Paterson VJ, Short T, Bright A, Lipsitz S, Murphy A, Miller K, Subramanian L, Radichel E, Ervin J, Castleman L, Brown E, Yeboah T, Simas TM, Terk D, Vedam S, Shah N, Weiseth A. Assessing patient autonomy in the context of TeamBirth, a quality improvement intervention to improve shared decision-making during labor and birth. Birth. 2024 Dec;51(4):855-866. doi: 10.1111/birt.12857. Epub 2024 Aug 14.

    PMID: 39140579BACKGROUND
  • Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw098.

    PMID: 27283160BACKGROUND
  • Vedam S, Stoll K, Rubashkin N, Martin K, Miller-Vedam Z, Hayes-Klein H, Jolicoeur G; CCinBC Steering Council. The Mothers on Respect (MOR) index: measuring quality, safety, and human rights in childbirth. SSM Popul Health. 2017 Jan 19;3:201-210. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.01.005. eCollection 2017 Dec.

    PMID: 29349217BACKGROUND
  • Vedam S, Stoll K, Taiwo TK, Rubashkin N, Cheyney M, Strauss N, McLemore M, Cadena M, Nethery E, Rushton E, Schummers L, Declercq E; GVtM-US Steering Council. The Giving Voice to Mothers study: inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States. Reprod Health. 2019 Jun 11;16(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2.

    PMID: 31182118BACKGROUND
  • Walker KF, Dencker A, Thornton JG. Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019 Oct 3;5:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097. eCollection 2020 Jan.

    PMID: 32021972BACKGROUND
  • Waterson P, Carman EM, Manser T, Hammer A. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSPSC): a systematic review of the psychometric properties of 62 international studies. BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):e026896. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026896.

    PMID: 31488465BACKGROUND
  • Tilden VP, Eckstrom E, Dieckmann NF. Development of the assessment for collaborative environments (ACE-15): A tool to measure perceptions of interprofessional "teamness". J Interprof Care. 2016 May;30(3):288-94. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1137891. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

    PMID: 27029641BACKGROUND
  • Ford E, Ayers S, Wright DB. Measurement of maternal perceptions of support and control in birth (SCIB). J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Feb;18(2):245-52. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0882.

    PMID: 19183096BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Satisfaction

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Treatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Target Duration
2 Years
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Registered Nurse Midwife, Associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2025

First Posted

April 13, 2025

Study Start

February 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 5, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Last Updated

April 13, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Locations