NCT06922526

Brief Summary

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a common complication following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation, with severe TR being associated with increased rates of heart failure hospitalization and all-cause mortality, significantly impairing patients' quality of life. With technological advancements, physiological pacing modalities have demonstrated superior clinical efficacy and safety profiles compared to conventional pacing methods. This study aims to evaluate predictors of adverse outcomes and TR progression in CIED recipients under different pacing modalities, thereby providing clinical guidance for high-risk patients.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2025

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 3, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 10, 2025

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 30, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

April 3, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 26, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Tricuspid regurgitation progression(Progression of tricuspid regurgitation ≥ grade 0.5)

    Grading of tricuspid regurgitation severity:Grade 0: None Grade 0.5: Trace Grade 1: Mild Grade 1.5: Mild to moderate Grade 2: Moderate Grade 2.5: Moderate to severe Grade 3: Severe

    Mean follow-up of 1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Heart Failure Readmission Rate After CIED Implantation

    Mean follow-up of 1 year

Study Arms (5)

Right ventricular pacing group

Device: Pacemaker implantation

conduction system pacing group

Device: Pacemaker implantation

biventricular pacing group

Device: Pacemaker implantation

TR progression group

non-TR progression group

Interventions

Pacemaker implantation methods include right ventricular pacing, biventricular pacing, conduction system pacing

Right ventricular pacing groupbiventricular pacing groupconduction system pacing group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients after cardiac pacemaker implantation

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients
  • Patients with an implantable electronic heart device (CIEDs)
  • The patient underwent pacemaker implantation at Qianfoshan Hospital between 2015 and 2025

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation or those who have undergone tricuspid valve surgery or interventional treatment prior to pacemaker implantation
  • Patients with severe valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, or arrhythmias
  • Patients with single-chamber pacemakers or poor images

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University

Jinan, 250000, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Hoke U, Auger D, Thijssen J, Wolterbeek R, van der Velde ET, Holman ER, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ, Delgado V, Marsan NA. Significant lead-induced tricuspid regurgitation is associated with poor prognosis at long-term follow-up. Heart. 2014 Jun;100(12):960-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304673. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

    PMID: 24449717BACKGROUND
  • Li X, Fan X, Wang Q, Wang Z, Zhu H, Li H, Wang H, Liu Z, Yao Y. Tricuspid regurgitation following pacemaker implantation for bradycardia: a two-year study comparing different pacing strategies. Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 Oct 20;136(20):2508-2510. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002825. Epub 2023 Aug 31. No abstract available.

    PMID: 37649400BACKGROUND
  • Li X, Zhu H, Fan X, Wang Q, Wang Z, Li H, Tao J, Wang H, Liu Z, Yao Y. Tricuspid regurgitation outcomes in left bundle branch area pacing and comparison with right ventricular septal pacing. Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jul;19(7):1202-1203. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Mar 10. No abstract available.

    PMID: 35278699BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart Valve DiseasesHeart DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Haiyan Wang, MD

    Shandong First Medical University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2025

First Posted

April 10, 2025

Study Start

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion

March 1, 2026

Study Completion

May 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 30, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations