An Evaluation of Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews for People With Learning Disabilities and Autistic People
CECiLiA
2 other identifiers
observational
695
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Aims In this research project, we will determine whether Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews are helpful for people with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families. Background Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews were started in 2014 to help get autistic people and people with learning disabilities out of psychiatric hospitals and to prevent their admission to psychiatric hospitals. Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews involve an independent panel including an Expert by Experience, a clinician, and a commissioner who is responsible for paying for an individual's care. The autistic person or the person with learning disability and their family also attend the meeting. The focus of a Care (Education) and Treatment Review is to either prevent a person from being admitted to a psychiatric hospital in the first place, or to help someone who is already in hospital, get out. They do this by trying to work out ways to overcome barriers that might be stopping someone from leaving hospital. However, we do not know if Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews stop people from being admitted to a psychiatric hospital in the first place, or help people already in hospital get out. Method Our project has four stages. In Stage 1 we will work with the members of our Lived Experience Advisory Panels to co-produce survey questions. We will design surveys for people with learning disabilities and autistic people, families and carers, Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews panel members, and health and social care professionals to complete. We will share these surveys with as many people as we can nationally. We will make adjustments so that people with learning disabilities can take part in our surveys. We know that individuals with moderate to severe learning disabilities and younger children will not be able to complete the surveys and so we will use other ways to gather their views and experiences. We will also try to work out how much it costs to have a Care (Education) and Treatment Review . Within Stage 2, we will find out how patients in hospital are doing over time, by attending Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews, CPA, and other patient meetings. We will ask people, including people with moderate and severe learning disabilities to take part in some interviews with us, ensuring we adapt the interview process, so it is accessible. We will use the information from these interviews to work out whether Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews are helping people and making things better. In Stage 3, we will look at the anonymous data that is collected by the NHS about everyone with a learning disability or autism who is admitted to hospital. We will work out what sorts of things helped them and what sorts of things did not help them get out of hospital. We think we will have data that covers over 11 years. Within our final stage, Stage 4, we will bring together all of the information we have collected from the different stages of the research to work out what it tells us. We will use the information along with input from our Lived Experience Advisory Panel members to co-produce and share reports and information about what we have found out. We will also co- develop and publish good practice guidance for doing Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews and make sure our guidance is shared in different ways and to different people who need it. Patient/public involvement We have partnered with Learning Disability England, the National Autistic Society, and the Challenging Behaviour Foundation who will each lead one of our three Lived Experience Advisory Panels: (1) people with learning disabilities, (2) autistic people, and (3) carers and family members. We will have regular meetings with each Lived Experience Advisory Panel to make sure we they can provide input throughout the study. They will help us to design the surveys and interviews, interpret our findings, share the findings and co-produce and publish our good practice guidance in different formats for different target audiences. Each advisory panel will meet separately but we will bring them together once a year to benefit from their combined input. Our project has been developed collaboratively with Learning Disability England, the National Autistic Society, and the Challenging Behaviour Foundation who all have experience of being involved within Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews. Learning Disability England, the National Autistic Society, and the Challenging Behaviour Foundation will be core members of our study management and study steering committees. Further, a nurse with significant learning disability and autism experience, Expert-by-Experience, and Care (Education) and Treatment Review panel chair is a co-researcher. A carer of a man with severe learning disability is also a co-researcher.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2025
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2027
April 9, 2025
April 1, 2025
1.4 years
April 1, 2025
April 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Experiences of all stakeholders, including people with learning disabilities and autistic people and their families, when taking part in C(E)TRs
Data will be gathered through national surveys; attendance at C(E)TRs, and CPA meetings to track individual progress over time, the collection of naturalistic data from the meetings, and though semi-structured interviews with attendees; and anonymised data available from NHS Digital for children and adults.
National surveys will be open for 8 months from their launch; data collection for case studies and associated semi-structed interviews will open for 15 months from the point of recruitment.
Study Arms (4)
A person with a learning disability, or an autistic person
Inclusion criteria: A person with a learning disability, or an autistic person who has received or taken part in a C(E)TR within the last 12-months including Blue Light (community) C(E)TRs; is aged 5 or older (i.e. eligible to attend school at Key Stage one) For those aged 16 years and older who lack capacity to make a decision about taking part in this research, advice indicating that they should be included from either a personal or nominate consultee For those aged 15 and younger, consent from the person or organisation with parental responsibility Exclusion criteria: Only having received or taken part in Independently Chaired Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews (IC(E)TRs) within the last 12-months. IC(E)TRs are only for those held within long-term segregation and are out of scope Anyone aged younger than 5 years
A family member or carer of an autistic person or person with a learning disability
Inclusion criteria: A family member or carer of an autistic person or person with a learning disability who has 1. received or taken part in a C(E)TR within the last 12-months including blue-light C(E)TRs and 2. is aged 5 or older (i.e. eligible to attend school at Key Stage one). Exclusion criteria: 1\. A family member or carer of an autistic person or person with a learning disability who has only having received or taken part in Independently Chaired Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews (IC(E)TRs) within the last 12-months. IC(E)TRs are only for those held within long-term segregation and are out of scope; or who is aged younger than 5 years.
A C(E)TR panel member (Chair, Expert by Experience or clinical member)
Inclusion criteria: A C(E)TR panel member who has taken part in a C(E)TR within the last 12-months including blue-light C(E)TRs. Exclusion criteria: Staff who have only taken part in Independently Chaired Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews (IC(E)TRs) within the last 12-months. IC(E)TRs are only for those held within long-term segregation and are out of scope
Health and social care professional (including commissioners)
Inclusion criteria: A health or social care professional, or commissioner who has taken part in a C(E)TR within the last 12-months including blue-light C(E)TRs. Exclusion criteria: Staff who have only taken part in Independently Chaired Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews (IC(E)TRs) within the last 12-months. IC(E)TRs are only for those held within long-term segregation and are out of scope
Eligibility Criteria
People with learning disabilities and autistic people, including children and young people, families and carers, C(E)TR panel members, and health and social care professionals including commissioners.
You may not qualify if:
- Stage 1 (Work Package 1)
- A person with a learning disability, or an autistic person, or a family member or carer of an autistic person or person with a learning disability
- Having received or taken part in a C(E)TR within the last 12-months including blue-light C(E)TRs
- Aged 5 or older (i.e. eligible to attend school at Key Stage one)
- For those aged 16 years and older who lack capacity to make a decision about taking part in this research, advice indicating that they should be included from either a personal or nominate consultee
- For those aged 15 and younger, consent from the person or organisation with parental responsibility
- Only having received or taken part in Independently Chaired Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews (IC(E)TRs) within the last 12-months. IC(E)TRs are only for those held within long-term segregation and are out of scope
- Aged younger than 5 years
- Stage 1 (Work Package 2)
- A C(E)TR chair, clinical member, or EbE or a health or social care professional, or commissioner
- Who has taken part in a C(E)TR within the last 12-months including blue-light C(E)TRs.
- \. Staff who have only taken part in Independently Chaired Care (Education) and Treatment Reviews (IC(E)TRs) within the last 12-months. IC(E)TRs are only for those held within long-term segregation and are out of scope
- Stage 2 (Work Package 3)
- People with learning disabilities or autistic people:
- Who are due to have at least two C(E)TRs within 15-months
- +15 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trustlead
- University of Birminghamcollaborator
- University of East Angliacollaborator
- University of Kentcollaborator
- Learning Disability Englandcollaborator
- The National Autistic Societycollaborator
- The Challenging Behaviour Foundationcollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Target Duration
- 695 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2025
First Posted
April 9, 2025
Study Start
April 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2027
Last Updated
April 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The major output from this study will be the publication of good practice guidance for C(E)TRs developed in collaboration with our LEAPs and based upon our research findings inclusive of a logic model about the C(E)TR process. In accordance with our ethics approval the research team will act to preserve participant confidentiality and will not disclose or reproduce any information by which participants could be identified, except where specific consent is obtained, or if abusive practice is disclosed that researchers would have a duty to report. Individual participant data therefore will not be shared with other researchers. However, we will make a pseudonymised version of our data available following a reasonable request (i.e. not placed in the public domain).