Research on the Effect of Noise Cancelling Headphones in Reducing Postoperative Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
this randomized controlled trial selects patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy under general anesthesia. By using noise reduction earphones during surgery, the patient's postoperative pain score and demand for opioids are observed, providing a basis and reference for the efficacy and safety of noise reduction earphones in gynecological endoscopic surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 12, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 12, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 12, 2026
ExpectedApril 9, 2025
March 1, 2025
3 months
March 28, 2025
April 6, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
pain scores
the patient's resting and exercise induced pain scores,by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) It typically involves a 10-centimeter horizontal or vertical line, with endpoints labeled "no pain" (0) and "worst pain imaginable" (10).
6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively
maximum pain scores
maximum pain scores at 0-6 hours, 6-12 hours, and 12-24 hours postoperatively.by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) It typically involves a 10-centimeter horizontal or vertical line, with endpoints labeled "no pain" (0) and "worst pain imaginable" (10).
at 0-6 hours, 6-12 hours, and 12-24 hours postoperatively.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
maximum resting pain score
within 24 hours postoperatively
total opioid consumption
within 24 hours postoperatively
the number of PCIA pump buttons
within 24 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Conventional processing group,
SHAM COMPARATORStandard monitoring techniques ,Conventional processing without noise cancelling headphones
wearing noise cancelling headphones group
EXPERIMENTALgroup started wearing noise cancelling headphones until the end of the surgery in the general anesthesia induction group to isolate intraoperative environmental noise
Interventions
(3)atients were given the same anesthesia regimen. Standard monitoring techniques include electrocardiogram, pulse oximeter, heart rate and blood pressure monitoring, continuous monitoring of bispecific index of electroencephalography, and the use of remifentanil (0.3 mg/kg) Rapid sequence induction was performed using sufentanil (0.3 μ g/kg), propofol (2.5mg/kg), and rocuronium bromide (0.6 mg/kg). Anesthesia was maintained using remifentanil (0.1-0.2 μ g/0kg/min), inhaled sevoflurane (1%), and intravenous propofol (1-4 mg/kg/h) to maintain BIS 40-60, with heart rate and blood pressure within 20% of baseline values.
The treatment group started wearing noise cancelling headphones until the end of the surgery in the general anesthesia induction group to isolate intraoperative environmental noise,patients were given the same anesthesia regimen. Standard monitoring techniques include electrocardiogram, pulse oximeter, heart rate and blood pressure monitoring, continuous monitoring of bispecific index of electroencephalography, and the use of remifentanil (0.3 mg/kg) Rapid sequence induction was performed using sufentanil (0.3 μ g/kg), propofol (2.5mg/kg), and rocuronium bromide (0.6 mg/kg). Anesthesia was maintained using remifentanil (0.1-0.2 μ g/0kg/min), inhaled sevoflurane (1%), and intravenous propofol (1-4 mg/kg/h) to maintain BIS 40-60, with heart rate and blood pressure within 20% of baseline values.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA grade I or II, aged 18-55 years , female were selected for gynecological laparoscopy under elective general anesthesia. -
You may not qualify if:
- History of serious illness requiring further care in the intensive care unit after surgery; Abnormal hearing; Postoperative mechanical ventilation or continued anesthesia or sedation is required; Preoperative chronic pain or long-term use of painkillers; other factors that hinder patients from cooperating with the research plan
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province,
Wuhan, Hubei, 430000, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Na Li, MD
Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2025
First Posted
April 9, 2025
Study Start
February 12, 2025
Primary Completion
May 12, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 12, 2026
Last Updated
April 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share