Consensus Statements on Definition, Components and Grading of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
PrECiSIOn
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
An international team of experts is working on a project called PrECiSIOn to develop a clear, consistent definition of PPCs. The goals of this study are to:
- Define postoperative pulmonary complications in a way that makes sense for patients, families, and healthcare providers.
- Rank complications by severity so doctors can focus on the most serious ones first.
- Decide how and when to monitor patients after surgery to catch problems early.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Sep 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 8, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2026
CompletedSeptember 18, 2025
April 1, 2025
4 months
April 1, 2025
September 13, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Generate consensus on the postoperative pulmonary complications construct
A diverse group of panellists worldwide, based on pre-specified qualification criteria, will conduct iterative Delphi rounds to generate consensus on the construct of postoperative pulmonary complications.
3-6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Generate consensus on the postoperative pulmonary complications definition and components
3-6 months
Generate consensus on the on the timeframe of monitoring for postoperative pulmonary complications
3-6 months
Generate consensus on the methods of monitoring of postoperative pulmonary complications
3-6 months
Generate consensus on weightage grade of individual postoperative pulmonary complications
3-6 months
Study Arms (2)
Delphi Panellists
An international panel of 35-40 panellists from Anesthesiology, Surgery or Intensive Care Medicine and including patient representatives, will be invited to this Delphi study. A concerted effort will be made to include panellists from low- and middle-income countries and both sexes.
Patient and Public involvement
Individuals who have either personally experienced PPCs following surgery within the last 5 years or, primary caregivers of such patients will be recruited as patient care representatives.
Interventions
This Delphi study involves multiple iterative rounds until a stable consensus or dissensus is reached on all the statements.
Structured interviews will be conducted by members of the steering committee and an independent qualitative research expert. A pilot-tested case vignette along with a Likert scale-based questionnaire, will be employed to gather insights regarding the impact and severity of PPCs. The impact of the individual components of PPCs will be evaluated on a 7-point Global Rate of Change (GRC) scale (from "very much worse" to very much better") to calculate the minimal clinical important difference. Patient care representatives will be engaged in anonymous voting on the questionnaire. PPCs' rankings and key themes synthesised from the interviews will be shared with the panel in the second Delphi round, facilitating the integration of patient perspectives into the consensus process.
Eligibility Criteria
To encourage the continued engagement of the panellists and help prevent them from dropping out before completing the full process, at least three personalised email reminders will be sent during each Delphi round, in addition to an effort to establish personal contact. Furthermore, all panellists will be recognised as collaborative authors in the final publication in appreciation of their professional expertise. Should the attrition rate of panellists exceed 20%, a sensitivity analysis will be conducted, considering the plausible worst-case and best-case scenarios, and taking into account the opinions of non-responders.
You may qualify if:
- At least 10 years of clinical experience as a staff member in Anesthesiology, Surgery or Intensive Care Medicine with involvement in care of patients with postoperative complications
- Author of at least three publications (observational studies or randomised controlled trials) using postoperative pulmonary complications as a primary or secondary outcome For patients and public involvement Individuals who have either personally experienced PPCs following surgery within the last 5 years or, primary caregivers of such patients will be recruited as patient care representatives. Proficiency in English is required. To mitigate potential bias, patient care representatives mustn't maintain a professional or advisory relationship with the steering committee or panellists.
You may not qualify if:
- \- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
New Cross Hospital
Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, WV100QP, United Kingdom
Related Publications (10)
Myles PS, Grocott MP, Boney O, Moonesinghe SR; COMPAC-StEP Group. Standardizing end points in perioperative trials: towards a core and extended outcome set. Br J Anaesth. 2016 May;116(5):586-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew066. No abstract available.
PMID: 27106961BACKGROUNDGottlieb M, Caretta-Weyer H, Chan TM, Humphrey-Murto S. Educator's blueprint: A primer on consensus methods in medical education research. AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jul 11;7(4):e10891. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10891. eCollection 2023 Aug.
PMID: 37448627BACKGROUNDAbbott TEF, Fowler AJ, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M, Moller AM, Canet J, Creagh-Brown B, Mythen M, Gin T, Lalu MM, Futier E, Grocott MP, Schultz MJ, Pearse RM; StEP-COMPAC Group. A systematic review and consensus definitions for standardised end-points in perioperative medicine: pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):1066-1079. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
PMID: 29661384BACKGROUNDJammer I, Wickboldt N, Sander M, Smith A, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Leva B, Rhodes A, Hoeft A, Walder B, Chew MS, Pearse RM; European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM); European Society of Anaesthesiology; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118.
PMID: 25058504BACKGROUNDLusquinhos J, Tavares M, Abelha F. Postoperative Pulmonary Complications and Perioperative Strategies: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2023 May 9;15(5):e38786. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38786. eCollection 2023 May.
PMID: 37303413BACKGROUNDShander A, Fleisher LA, Barie PS, Bigatello LM, Sladen RN, Watson CB. Clinical and economic burden of postoperative pulmonary complications: patient safety summit on definition, risk-reducing interventions, and preventive strategies. Crit Care Med. 2011 Sep;39(9):2163-72. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821f0522.
PMID: 21572323BACKGROUNDCanet J, Sabate S, Mazo V, Gallart L, de Abreu MG, Belda J, Langeron O, Hoeft A, Pelosi P; PERISCOPE group. Development and validation of a score to predict postoperative respiratory failure in a multicentre European cohort: A prospective, observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jul;32(7):458-70. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000223.
PMID: 26020123BACKGROUNDPiccioni F, Langiano N, Bignami E, Guarnieri M, Proto P, D'Andrea R, Mazzoli CA, Riccardi I, Bacuzzi A, Guzzetti L, Rossi I, Scolletta S, Comi D, Benigni A, Pierconti F, Coccia C, Biscari M, Murzilli A, Umari M, Peratoner C, Serra E, Baldinelli F, Accardo R, Diana F, Fasciolo A, Amodio R, Ball L, Greco M, Pelosi P, Della Rocca G; One-Lung Ventilation Investigators Group (Supplementary Appendix S1). One-Lung Ventilation and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Major Lung Resection Surgery. A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023 Dec;37(12):2561-2571. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.04.029. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
PMID: 37730455BACKGROUNDFernandez-Bustamante A, Frendl G, Sprung J, Kor DJ, Subramaniam B, Martinez Ruiz R, Lee JW, Henderson WG, Moss A, Mehdiratta N, Colwell MM, Bartels K, Kolodzie K, Giquel J, Vidal Melo MF. Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, Early Mortality, and Hospital Stay Following Noncardiothoracic Surgery: A Multicenter Study by the Perioperative Research Network Investigators. JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):157-166. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4065.
PMID: 27829093BACKGROUNDNasa P, Yurttas T, Battaglini D, Blot S, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Gama de Abreu M, van Meenen DM, Myatra SN, Serpa Neto A, Oppong R, Paulus F, Renukappa S, Schultz MJ, Slutsky AS, Hemmes SNT; PrECiSIOn-group. Consensus on the definition, components, timeframe and grading of composite outcome of postoperative pulmonary complication-protocol for an international mixed-method consensus study (PrECiSIOn). BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):e103888. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103888.
PMID: 40829816DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Marcus Schultz, PhD
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2025
First Posted
April 8, 2025
Study Start
September 8, 2025
Primary Completion
December 30, 2025
Study Completion
February 28, 2026
Last Updated
September 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The IPD is available to investigators and can be shared with appropriate requests.