NCT06916039

Brief Summary

High glycaemic index (GI) breakfasts resulting in sharp rises in blood glucose may adversely affect memory and attention, particularly in the late postprandial phase (i.e., 120-180 minutes after breakfast). Previous research indicates that breakfast GI influences cognition in young adults, but many studies were too short to capture late postprandial effects. However, young adults may be particularly responsive to these adverse effects on cognition since they are prone to experience circadian misalignment in the morning due to the fact that their midpoint of sleep (i.e., chronotype) is biologically most delayed. Our recent research suggests that persons with later chronotypes do not display the known circadian decline in glucose tolerance as evidenced by equally high glycaemic responses to the identical high GI meal consumed in the morning or the evening. Hence, consuming an early breakfast "against the inner clock" may negatively affect glycaemic response particularly among persons with a later chronotype. Whether this vulnerability for persons with a later chronotype may extend to effects on cognition has not been examined. Thus, the main objective of this controlled nutrition trial is to analyze the effects of a high versus a low GI beverage as a breakfast on subsequent memory and attention until 180 minutes after breakfast among young healthy university students. This will be examined in two samples, i.e. students with an earlier and with a later chronotype. Accordingly, our study will allow us to explore the relevance of chronotype for (i) the postprandial course of glucose levels and (ii) the course of memory and attention per se in the postprandial phase. In preparation for the present study, at Paderborn University 356 students (aged 18-25) were enrolled between October 2024 and January 2025 in the GlyCoBrain Observational study (ID: NCT06679088) and were screened for their chronotypes. From these, persons with the earliest and latest chronotype will be invited to participate in the present cross-over designed study. It is planned that overall 88 persons will complete both intervention days consuming either a high GI or a low GI breakfast at 9:00 a.m. and undergoing repeated assessment of cognitive performance during the subsequent 180 minutes.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
177

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable healthy

Timeline
15mo left

Started Apr 2025

Longer than P75 for not_applicable healthy

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress47%
Apr 2025Jul 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 31, 2025

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 4, 2025

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2025

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2026

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2027

Expected
Last Updated

April 11, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

March 31, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 8, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

chronotypebreakfastglycemic indexattentioncognitionmemorybody compositioncontinous glucose monitoringMCTQ

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in immediate verbal memory

    Difference in immediate verbal memory between high and low GI breakfasts at 150-180 minutes (i.e., in the late postprandial phase)

    150-180 minutes

Study Arms (2)

high glycemic index breakfast

EXPERIMENTAL

1\. a high GI beverage (i.e. "glucose beverage") consisting of 75 g glucose dissolved in 500 ml tap water

Other: immediate verbal memory after high GI breakfastOther: immediate verbal memory after low glycemic index breakfast

low glycemic index breakfast

EXPERIMENTAL

2\. a low GI beverage inducing no reactive hypoglycaemia ("isomaltulose® beverage") consisting of 75 g isomaltulose dissolved in 500 ml tap water

Other: immediate verbal memory after high GI breakfastOther: immediate verbal memory after low glycemic index breakfast

Interventions

Difference in immediate verbal memory after high GI breakfast at 150-180 minutes (i.e., in the late postprandial phase)

high glycemic index breakfastlow glycemic index breakfast

Difference in immediate verbal memory after low GI breakfast at 150-180 minutes (i.e., in the late postprandial phase)

high glycemic index breakfastlow glycemic index breakfast

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 25 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants of GlyCoBrain Observational Study
  • Early or late chronotype (approx. lowest and highest quartile)

You may not qualify if:

  • Students studying nutritional science and home economics (study programs of the study PI)
  • Intermediate chronotypes
  • Persons unwilling to abstain from smoking or cannabis use during the intervention period
  • Persons unwilling to consume standard evening meal prior to intervention days
  • BMI\>30 kg/m² (diurnal variation in glycaemic control is known to be absent among persons with obesity) and \<18.5 kg/m2 (since underweight is also known to affect glucose homeostasis)
  • acute or permanent use of sleep-promoting medications (including herbal preparation):
  • medications: melatonin, diphenhydramine, doxylamine
  • herbal preparations: hops, St. John's wort, lemon balm, lavender, passionflower, Baldurat, Neurexan, cannabinoids
  • Use of psychotropic medications (antidepressants, tranquilizer, antipsychotics)
  • Use of methylphenidate (e.g. Ritalin, Medikinet, Concerta)
  • Use of cannabinoids by prescription
  • Continuous administration of antihistamines when discontinuation is not feasible during the intervention
  • Use of herbal preparations affecting memory and concentration (e.g. gingko, ginseng, ashwagandha)
  • Use of other medications (e.g. insulin, metformin, SGLT2 inhibitors, steroids, ACE inhibitors)
  • Selected chronic diseases (depression and other mental disorders such as anxiety disorder, ADHD, diabetes mellitus (all types), prediabetes, blood clotting disorders (e.g., thrombocytopenia, hemophilia), eating disorders (e.g., anorexia, binge eating, bulimia), Chronic inflammatory bowel diseases, infectious diseases (HIV, hepatitis), Addiction disorders (e.g., alcohol, drug, or medication dependency)
  • +3 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Paderborn University

Paderborn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 33098, Germany

Location

Related Publications (23)

  • Smith MA, Riby LM, Eekelen JA, Foster JK. Glucose enhancement of human memory: a comprehensive research review of the glucose memory facilitation effect. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):770-83. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Sep 29.

    PMID: 20883717BACKGROUND
  • Shrier I, Redelmeier A, Schnitzer ME, Steele RJ. Challenges in interpreting results from 'multiple regression' when there is interaction between covariates. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2021 Apr;26(2):53-56. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111225. Epub 2019 Aug 22.

    PMID: 31439540BACKGROUND
  • Schroder M, Muller K, Falkenstein M, Stehle P, Kersting M, Libuda L. Lunch at school and children's cognitive functioning in the early afternoon: results from the Cognition Intervention Study Dortmund Continued (CoCo). Br J Nutr. 2016 Oct;116(7):1298-1305. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516002932. Epub 2016 Sep 9.

    PMID: 27608921BACKGROUND
  • Schroder M, Muller K, Falkenstein M, Stehle P, Kersting M, Libuda L. Short-term effects of lunch on children's executive cognitive functioning: The randomized crossover Cognition Intervention Study Dortmund PLUS (CogniDo PLUS). Physiol Behav. 2015 Dec 1;152(Pt A):307-14. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.09.025. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

    PMID: 26427889BACKGROUND
  • Sanchez-Aguadero N, Recio-Rodriguez JI, Patino-Alonso MC, Mora-Simon S, Alonso-Dominguez R, Sanchez-Salgado B, Gomez-Marcos MA, Garcia-Ortiz L. Postprandial effects of breakfast glycaemic index on cognitive performance among young, healthy adults: A crossover clinical trial. Nutr Neurosci. 2020 Jan;23(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/1028415X.2018.1461459. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

    PMID: 29649949BACKGROUND
  • Saad A, Dalla Man C, Nandy DK, Levine JA, Bharucha AE, Rizza RA, Basu R, Carter RE, Cobelli C, Kudva YC, Basu A. Diurnal pattern to insulin secretion and insulin action in healthy individuals. Diabetes. 2012 Nov;61(11):2691-700. doi: 10.2337/db11-1478. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

    PMID: 22751690BACKGROUND
  • Philippou E, Constantinou M. The influence of glycemic index on cognitive functioning: a systematic review of the evidence. Adv Nutr. 2014 Mar 1;5(2):119-30. doi: 10.3945/an.113.004960.

    PMID: 24618754BACKGROUND
  • Nabb SL, Benton D. The effect of the interaction between glucose tolerance and breakfasts varying in carbohydrate and fibre on mood and cognition. Nutr Neurosci. 2006 Jun-Aug;9(3-4):161-8. doi: 10.1080/10284150600955099.

    PMID: 17176639BACKGROUND
  • Nabb S, Benton D. The influence on cognition of the interaction between the macro-nutrient content of breakfast and glucose tolerance. Physiol Behav. 2006 Jan 30;87(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.034. Epub 2005 Oct 12.

    PMID: 16225896BACKGROUND
  • Morris CJ, Yang JN, Garcia JI, Myers S, Bozzi I, Wang W, Buxton OM, Shea SA, Scheer FA. Endogenous circadian system and circadian misalignment impact glucose tolerance via separate mechanisms in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 28;112(17):E2225-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418955112. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

    PMID: 25870289BACKGROUND
  • Lotti S, Pagliai G, Colombini B, Sofi F, Dinu M. Chronotype Differences in Energy Intake, Cardiometabolic Risk Parameters, Cancer, and Depression: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Adv Nutr. 2022 Feb 1;13(1):269-281. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab115.

    PMID: 34549270BACKGROUND
  • Lamport DJ, Chadwick HK, Dye L, Mansfield MW, Lawton CL. A low glycaemic load breakfast can attenuate cognitive impairments observed in middle aged obese females with impaired glucose tolerance. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Oct;24(10):1128-36. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 May 14.

    PMID: 24925124BACKGROUND
  • Kennedy DO, Scholey AB. Glucose administration, heart rate and cognitive performance: effects of increasing mental effort. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2000 Mar;149(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s002139900335.

    PMID: 10789884BACKGROUND
  • Flint A, Raben A, Blundell JE, Astrup A. Reproducibility, power and validity of visual analogue scales in assessment of appetite sensations in single test meal studies. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000 Jan;24(1):38-48. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801083.

    PMID: 10702749BACKGROUND
  • Dye L, Gilsenan MB, Quadt F, Martens VE, Bot A, Lasikiewicz N, Camidge D, Croden F, Lawton C. Manipulation of glycemic response with isomaltulose in a milk-based drink does not affect cognitive performance in healthy adults. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2010 Apr;54(4):506-15. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200900196.

    PMID: 20140897BACKGROUND
  • Donohoe RT, Benton D. Cognitive functioning is susceptible to the level of blood glucose. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Aug;145(4):378-85. doi: 10.1007/s002130051071.

    PMID: 10460314BACKGROUND
  • Deng Q, Haszard JJ, Conner TS, Rapsey C, Peng M, Venn BJ. Cognitive performance, mood and satiety following ingestion of beverages imparting different glycaemic responses: a randomised double-blind crossover trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021 Apr;75(4):602-610. doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-00749-6. Epub 2020 Sep 17.

    PMID: 32943769BACKGROUND
  • Blaak EE, Antoine JM, Benton D, Bjorck I, Bozzetto L, Brouns F, Diamant M, Dye L, Hulshof T, Holst JJ, Lamport DJ, Laville M, Lawton CL, Meheust A, Nilson A, Normand S, Rivellese AA, Theis S, Torekov SS, Vinoy S. Impact of postprandial glycaemia on health and prevention of disease. Obes Rev. 2012 Oct;13(10):923-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01011.x. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

    PMID: 22780564BACKGROUND
  • Benton D, Ruffin MP, Lassel T, Nabb S, Messaoudi M, Vinoy S, Desor D, Lang V. The delivery rate of dietary carbohydrates affects cognitive performance in both rats and humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2003 Feb;166(1):86-90. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1334-5. Epub 2002 Dec 12.

    PMID: 12488949BACKGROUND
  • Benton D, Nabb S. Breakfasts that release glucose at different speeds interact with previous alcohol intake to influence cognition and mood before and after lunch. Behav Neurosci. 2004 Oct;118(5):936-43. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.118.5.936.

    PMID: 15506876BACKGROUND
  • Anderson JR, Hawkins MAW, Updegraff J, Gunstad J, Spitznagel MB. Baseline glucoregulatory function moderates the effect of dairy milk and fruit juice on postprandial cognition in healthy young adults. Eur J Nutr. 2018 Oct;57(7):2343-2352. doi: 10.1007/s00394-017-1505-0. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

    PMID: 28707217BACKGROUND
  • Anderson JR, Maki KC, Palacios OM, Edirisinghe I, Burton-Freeman B, Spitznagel MB. Varying roles of glucoregulatory function measures in postprandial cognition following milk consumption. Eur J Nutr. 2021 Apr;60(3):1499-1510. doi: 10.1007/s00394-020-02343-9. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

    PMID: 32737613BACKGROUND
  • Gaylor CM, Benton D, Brennan A, Young HA. The impact of glycaemic load on cognitive performance: A meta-analysis and guiding principles for future research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Oct;141:104824. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104824. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

    PMID: 35963545BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Anette E Buyken, Prof. Dr.

    Paderborn University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The study is double-blind, meaning that neither participants nor researchers know whether the consumed beverage has a high or low GI. Beverages will be pre-prepared by staff not involved in its provision.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: It is estimated that a maximum of 177 participants will need to be invited, to obtain full data sets from 44 participants of an earlier chronotype and 44 of a later chronotype each completing the cross-over designed intervention study. The intervention will consists of consumption of a carbohydrate-rich breakfast as a high-GI beverage at 8:40 p.m or a low-GI beverage at the same time. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups stratified by chronotype: intake of a beverage with a high GI or low GI on day 1. On day 7, the meal of the high GI or low GI meal is switched. The trial is a two-arm cross-over study in which each participant serves as his / her own control to account for interindividual variations in diurnal glycaemic responses and cognitive performance.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Anette Buyken

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2025

First Posted

April 8, 2025

Study Start

April 4, 2025

Primary Completion

March 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Last Updated

April 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations