NCT06700850

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate two new prototype non-medicated multilayer foam dressings on healthy, intact skin. The study will find out how well two new prototype dressings stay in place as well as other dressing performance and safety factors when compared to corresponding, marketed dressings with a similar intended use profile and shape. The study will compare:

  1. 1.Prototype dressing (rectangle) vs Marketed dressing (rectangle) on the knee.
  2. 2.Prototype dressing (square) vs Marketed dressing (square) on the thigh.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
135

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable healthy

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable healthy

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 28, 2024

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 8, 2024

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 22, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 21, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 21, 2025

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 2, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 2, 2026

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

November 8, 2024

Results QC Date

February 4, 2026

Last Update Submit

March 13, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Foam dressinghealthy volunteersintact skinwear-time

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants With Acceptable Dressing Presence at Day 7

    Count of participants with acceptable dressing presence was determined from a yes/no assessment at day 7, with a 'yes' response defined as the dressing is in place with no border lift reaching the pad and no pad exposure.

    Day 7

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Acceptable Dressing Presence at Day 1 and Day 3

    Day 1 and Day 3

  • Presence of Dressing

    Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7

  • Pad Integrity

    Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7

  • Pad Lift

    Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7

  • Border Lift

    Day 1, Day 3 and Day 7

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Prototype dressing (rectangle) vs Marketed dressing (rectangle) on knees

OTHER

Each participant will receive a comparison pair Prototype dressing (rectangle) vs Marketed dressing (rectangle) applied to knees (one dressing per knee). Each dressing of the comparison pair will be randomised to either the right or left knee in a 1:1 ratio.

Device: Prototype dressing rectangleDevice: Marketed dressing rectangle

Prototype dressing (square) vs Marketed dressing (square) on thighs

OTHER

Each participant will receive a comparison pair Prototype dressing (square) vs Marketed dressing (square) applied to thighs (one dressing per thigh). Each dressing of the comparison pair will be randomised to either the right or left thigh in a 1:1 ratio.

Device: Prototype dressing squareDevice: Marketed dressing square

Interventions

Prototype multilayer foam wound dressing. Size: 30x10cm. Topical application. Single use.

Prototype dressing (rectangle) vs Marketed dressing (rectangle) on knees

CE marked multilayer foam wound dressing. Size: 30x10cm. Topical application. Single use

Prototype dressing (rectangle) vs Marketed dressing (rectangle) on knees

Prototype multilayer foam wound dressing. Size: 7.5x7.5cm. Topical application. Single use.

Prototype dressing (square) vs Marketed dressing (square) on thighs

CE marked multilayer foam wound dressing. Size: 7.5x7.5cm. Topical application. Single use.

Prototype dressing (square) vs Marketed dressing (square) on thighs

Eligibility Criteria

Age22 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participant is capable of providing informed consent
  • Participant is willing and able to make all required study visits
  • Aged 22-70 years at the time of signing the informed consent\*
  • Participant must be in good health, as determined by the Investigator, based on medical evaluation, including medical history and skin application site assessment (healthy intact skin at or near any of the dressing application sites)
  • Participant is willing not to use cosmetic or medicinal lotions, creams, ointments and anything else which may interfere with dressing adhesion at dressing application sites for the duration of the study from 24 hours before dressing application on Day 0.
  • Participant is willing to have excess hair removed from the dressing application sites
  • Participant is willing to avoid immersing the dressings in water (no swimming or bathing) for the duration of the study
  • Footnote:
  • \* at least 10% of participants are aged \>55 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Female participant who is pregnant, or lactating.
  • Participant has a known sensitivity to any of the study products, materials or ancillary product or components.
  • Known skin sensitivity or allergies to adhesives, skin wipes, soap, surgical first-aid dressings, natural rubber or rubber latex, etc.
  • Participants with a current active skin disease (e.g., eczema, psoriasis, or severe dermatoporosis), sunburn or skin peeling at the dressing application sites.
  • Participants with a medical condition which may interfere with their perception of pain (such as diabetes, small-fibre neuropathy, allodynia, hyperalgesia etc.).
  • Heavy smokers (e.g. \>20 cigarettes (\~1 pack) a day over the last 10 years) whose pain perception may have been affected through smoking.
  • Participants with any skin features near any of the dressing application sites that could be identifiable/may interfere with skin assessments (e.g. tattoos/distinctive markings or scars/keloids).
  • Participants diagnosed with hyperhidrosis or who self-report their normal sweating level to be severe as determined by the Sweating Severity Self-Assessment (SSSA) at screening (e.g. mild, moderate, severe).
  • Participants not willing to refrain from the use of pain relief medication on assessment days (0, 3, 5 and 7) and in the case of certain medications, 24 hours before assessments.
  • Participants unwilling to refrain from activities which may directly affect the dressing, dressing application sites or assessments (such as undergoing planned scanning procedures, e.g., X-ray, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scanning; exposure to airport scanners or devices emitting radio waves; exposure to atypical conditions of pressure, humidity and temperature; immersing the dressing in water e.g. bathing / swimming / cleaning the dressing application sites; using a sauna; undertaking strenuous physical activity like aerobics, running, cycling, heavy labor etc.; using lotions/creams/ointments etc. at the dressing application sites; excessively exposing the dressing application sites to the sun (e.g. sunbathing for \>1 hour); wearing tightly fitting clothes which could affect the dressings.
  • Individuals who have participated in a clinical study in the last 7 days, using the same dressing application sites.
  • Participants with poor compliance and / or poor willingness to co-operate.
  • Individuals who should not participate in the clinical investigation for any other reason (including the taking of certain medications and with respect to the physiotherapy session) as judged by the Investigator.
  • Individuals who are inmates in psychiatric wards, prison or state institutions, or any individuals otherwise regarded as vulnerable (as per ISO 14155 Section 3.55).
  • Employees of the investigation sites directly involved in this clinical investigation or employees of the sponsor's company.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

SGS proderm

Schenefeld, Schleswig-Holstein, 22869, Germany

Location

Limitations and Caveats

This was a clinical investigation to evaluate the performance of two prototype dressings in comparison to their respective comparator dressings. Only participants with healthy and intact skin at the test sites were included in the investigation and as such the test conditions do not try and replicate the use case conditions for wound management as the influence of a wound is not considered. As such the interpretation of the results should not be extended beyond the scope of this investigation.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Senior Manager Clinical Compliance
Organization
Smith+Nephew, Inc

Study Officials

  • Kirstin Deuble-Bente

    SGS proderm

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 8, 2024

First Posted

November 22, 2024

Study Start

October 28, 2024

Primary Completion

January 21, 2025

Study Completion

January 21, 2025

Last Updated

April 2, 2026

Results First Posted

April 2, 2026

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations