NCT06915623

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate a gel's potential to improve gum health around dental implants when used alongside traditional cleaning methods. The central research question is: Does the gel reduce gum bleeding? Researchers will compare the effects of traditional dental cleaning alone wit those of dental cleaning combined with gel administration, focusing on overall gum health around implants. The study will enroll eight participants-some with early gum issues, such as bleeding gums, and others with healthy gums. Each participant will be randomly assigned to receive either regular dental cleaning or the cleaning paired with gel application. The study process includes the following steps:

  1. 1.Participants will visit the clinic and receive one of the two treatments randomly.
  2. 2.One week later, they will complete a printed survey detailing any symptoms or discomfort experienced .
  3. 3.After four weeks, participants will return to the clinic for checkups and tests to measure progress.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
8

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for early_phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Shorter than P25 for early_phase_1

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2023

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 28, 2025

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

March 28, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 4, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Peri-implant mucositisclinical trialpilot studyhealthy peri-implantbleeding on probingnanocrystal gel

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Bleeding on probing (BOP)

    A periodontal probe is gently inserted into the sulcus (the space between the implant and the surrounding gum tissue). The probe is moved around the implant in a sweeping motion, covering all surfaces (Mesial, Distal, Buccal and Palatal/Lingual). This gesture is done with light pressure to avoid causing unnecessary trauma to the tissues. After probing, the clinician observes the site for any bleeding. Bleeding that occurs within 10 to 15 seconds after probing is recorded as a positive BOP result.

    First assessment is the day of the intervention and the last one is 4 weeks later at follow-up.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Plaque index (PI)

    It is assessed on intervention day and at a 4 week- follow up appointment

  • Modified Gingival Index (MGI)

    It is assessed on intervention day and at a 4 week- follow up appointment

  • Probing Depth

    It is assessed on intervention day and at a 4 week- follow up appointment

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Suppuration

    It's assessed at the 4 week follow-up appointment.

  • Irritation, Pain and Discomfort

    This was reported at 7 days post-op.

Study Arms (2)

Test Group

EXPERIMENTAL

This group received standard mechanical debridement around the implants with a nanocrystal gel administered topically as an adjunct treatment.

Drug: Innovative Gel applicationProcedure: Mechanical Debridement

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group only received standard mechanical debridement around implants.

Procedure: Mechanical Debridement

Interventions

Innovative gel application: Gel is applied as an adjunct treatment to cleaning and scaling.

Test Group

Cleaning and scaling of the implant.

Control groupTest Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18 or older
  • Maxillary or mandibular fixed implant-supported prostheses (up to 3 units)
  • Diagnosis of peri-implant health or peri-implant mucositis
  • Signed an informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Advanced peri-implantitis
  • Extensive implant-supported restorations (four units or more)
  • Recent radiotherapy, chemotherapy, long-term systemic corticosteroid therapy
  • Drugs inducing gingival hyperplasia
  • Recent antibiotics (within three months)
  • Prosthetic restorations impeding clinical assessment
  • Poor marginal contours or prosthetic complications
  • Peri-implant bone loss exceeding 30%
  • Acute oral infection
  • Uncontrolled diabetes, systemic diseases, immune deficiency, autoimmune disease
  • Long-term bisphosphonate use

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculté de Médecine dentaire de l'Université Laval

Québec, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Tamimi F, Le Nihouannen D, Bassett DC, Ibasco S, Gbureck U, Knowles J, Wright A, Flynn A, Komarova SV, Barralet JE. Biocompatibility of magnesium phosphate minerals and their stability under physiological conditions. Acta Biomater. 2011 Jun;7(6):2678-85. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 Feb 13.

    PMID: 21324383BACKGROUND
  • Laurenti M, Al Subaie A, Abdallah MN, Cortes AR, Ackerman JL, Vali H, Basu K, Zhang YL, Murshed M, Strandman S, Zhu J, Makhoul N, Barralet JE, Tamimi F. Two-Dimensional Magnesium Phosphate Nanosheets Form Highly Thixotropic Gels That Up-Regulate Bone Formation. Nano Lett. 2016 Aug 10;16(8):4779-87. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00636. Epub 2016 Jul 6.

    PMID: 27280476BACKGROUND
  • Figuero E, Graziani F, Sanz I, Herrera D, Sanz M. Management of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):255-73. doi: 10.1111/prd.12049.

    PMID: 25123773BACKGROUND
  • Behmanesh S, Chow K, Dondani J, Al-Hashedi A, Tamimi F. Effectiveness of 2D magnesium phosphate hydrogel for surgical decontamination of dental implants: A case series. J Prosthodont. 2025 Jun;34(5):449-455. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13961. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

    PMID: 39363547BACKGROUND
  • Al-Hashedi AA, Laurenti M, Benhamou V, Tamimi F. Decontamination of titanium implants using physical methods. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Aug;28(8):1013-1021. doi: 10.1111/clr.12914. Epub 2016 Jul 8.

    PMID: 27392811BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Nancy Mouradian, DMD, MSc, FRCD(C), Dip.ABP

    Laval University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Beatrice Groleau-Asselin, DMD, MSc, FRCD(C)

    Laval University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Test group: Received standard intervention and Gel intervention Control group: Received standard intervention
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2025

First Posted

April 8, 2025

Study Start

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion

July 31, 2023

Study Completion

July 31, 2023

Last Updated

April 8, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

In the patient consent form, possible IPD sharing was not disclosed. This might be considered in future trial registrations.

Locations