Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Temporal Interference Stimulation in Treating Patients With Severe Consciousness Disorders
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Investigating the efficacy and safety of temporal interference stimulation for patients with disorders of consciousness.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 21, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 16, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 17, 2026
December 16, 2025
March 1, 2025
1.1 years
March 3, 2025
December 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Effective rate of awakening
The CRS-R is employed, with a minimum of 5 CRS-R assessments conducted at each follow-up time point, accompanied by simultaneous video recording. And the highest value is scored as a state of consciousness. The clinical assessment of participants' consciousness is deemed significantly improved when it fulfills the following criteria: a) MCS- recover to consciousness level of MCS+ or higher; b) Vegetative state(VS) recover to consciousness level of MCS- or higher; c) MCS status (MCS- or MCS+) recover to emergence from MCS (restoration of functional communication).
Stimulation for 1 month
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The difference of CRS-R scale relative to baseline between TI group and sham group
Stimulation begin for 14 days, 1 month and 3 months
The difference of Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs) scale relative to baseline between TI group and sham group
Stimulation begin for 14 days, 1 month and 3 months
The difference of modified Ashworth scale relative to baseline between TI group and sham group
Stimulation begin for 14 days, 1 month and 3 months
The difference of Nociception Coma Scale-Revised (NCS-R) scale relative to baseline between TI group and sham group
Stimulation begin for 14 days, 1 month and 3 months
The difference of effective rate of awakening between TI group and sham group by CRS-R scale
Stimulation begin for 1 month and 3 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
TI stimulation group
EXPERIMENTALThe two high-frequency electric fields of the TI device are set at different frequencies, thereby resulting in the generation of a low-frequency electric field that is capable of triggering brain physiological responses. The duration is 10 minutes.
Sham TI stimulation group
SHAM COMPARATORThe two high-frequency electric fields of the TI device are set to be completely of the same frequency (2000Hz), thus no low-frequency electric field is produced and no cerebral physiological responses are elicited. The duration lasts for 10 minutes.
Interventions
Participants will accept the sham TI stimulus for one month
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Severe consciousness disorder patients aged 18 to 75 years old, regardless of gender;
- Patients with severe consciousness disorders, namely a minimally conscious state or vegetative state that lasts for 28 days or more;
- Patients with normal body temperature, stable vital signs, spontaneous breathing, tracheotomy without the use of a metal cannula and with a small amount of sputum, and who are eligible for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination;
- Written informed consent obtained from the patient's family members in advance.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with a previous history of significant neuropsychiatric and other major disorders such as those involving the heart, lung, liver, and kidney;
- Those who have undergone V-P shunt or Ommaya reservoir implantation and other procedures that may influence the analysis of magnetic resonance scanning signals;
- Patients who are scheduled for V-P shunt or Ommaya reservoir implantation in the near future;
- Pregnant women;
- Those who have participated in other drug or device clinical trials;
- Patients with poorly controlled epilepsy in the recent period;
- Those with infections at the TI stimulation site or compromised skin integrity at the electrode placement site;
- Those currently taking medications prone to inducing epilepsy, such as quinolone drugs;
- Those with intracranial infections, intracranial tumors, or metallic objects within the cranium;
- Those allergic to electrode gel or adhesives;
- Those with implanted electronic devices within the body;
- Those with severe cardiac disorders and those equipped with cardiac pacemakers.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Huashan Hospitallead
- Shanghai First Rehabilitation Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Department of neurological rehabilitation, Shanghai First Rehabilitation Hospital, Tongji University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200000, China
Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200000, China
Related Publications (6)
Violante IR, Alania K, Cassara AM, Neufeld E, Acerbo E, Carron R, Williamson A, Kurtin DL, Rhodes E, Hampshire A, Kuster N, Boyden ES, Pascual-Leone A, Grossman N. Non-invasive temporal interference electrical stimulation of the human hippocampus. Nat Neurosci. 2023 Nov;26(11):1994-2004. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01456-8. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
PMID: 37857775RESULTThibaut A, Schiff N, Giacino J, Laureys S, Gosseries O. Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):600-614. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30031-6. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
PMID: 31003899RESULTGiacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, Whyte J, Ashman EJ, Ashwal S, Barbano R, Hammond FM, Laureys S, Ling GSF, Nakase-Richardson R, Seel RT, Yablon S, Getchius TSD, Gronseth GS, Armstrong MJ. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: Disorders of consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology. 2018 Sep 4;91(10):450-460. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005926. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
PMID: 30089618RESULTGrossman N, Bono D, Dedic N, Kodandaramaiah SB, Rudenko A, Suk HJ, Cassara AM, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Tsai LH, Pascual-Leone A, Boyden ES. Noninvasive Deep Brain Stimulation via Temporally Interfering Electric Fields. Cell. 2017 Jun 1;169(6):1029-1041.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.024.
PMID: 28575667RESULTTasserie J, Uhrig L, Sitt JD, Manasova D, Dupont M, Dehaene S, Jarraya B. Deep brain stimulation of the thalamus restores signatures of consciousness in a nonhuman primate model. Sci Adv. 2022 Mar 18;8(11):eabl5547. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abl5547. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
PMID: 35302854RESULTSchiff ND. Recovery of consciousness after brain injury: a mesocircuit hypothesis. Trends Neurosci. 2010 Jan;33(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2009.11.002. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
PMID: 19954851RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xuehai Wu, Ph.D.
Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- This study is being conducted as a double-blind trial, wherein the surgeons, assessors and participants' family members are kept unaware of the assigned research groups. However, it is necessary to inform the physicians responsible for adjustment of stimulation parameters about the allocation of participants. Follow-up assessments of participants after stimulation will be conducted by an independent assessor using standardized evaluation criteria.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Director of Shanghai Neurosurgical Emergency Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2025
First Posted
March 26, 2025
Study Start
April 21, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 16, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 17, 2026
Last Updated
December 16, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share