Emotion Processing and Regulation in People With Intellectual Disability
EPRID
1 other identifier
interventional
40
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
BACKGROUND Intellectual disability (ID) is neurodevelopmental disorder with social impairments, in areas such as interpersonal communication skills and emotion regulation. This overlaps with disabilities associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Differences in emotion processing, specifically emotion recognition, reappraisal, and reinforcement learning, has not been compared between patients with ID and ASD. Despite difficulties in emotion regulation among patients with ID, there is a lack of adapted psychotherapy for this patient group. AIMS
- To examine differences in emotion processing in individuals with intellectual disability (ID) compared to individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and typically developed individuals.
- To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an adapted psychotherapeutic intervention to improve emotion regulation in individuals with ID. Data and method The first research question is addressed through a cross-sectional study involving 160 participants: 40 individuals with ID, 40 individuals with ASD, and 80 typically developed controls. Participants will undergo psychological experiments where the investigator simultaneously measure eye movement and pupil dilation using an eye-tracker. To investigate different aspects of social cognition, the investigator will use three psychological experiments: emotion recognition, emotion reappraisal, and reinforced learning in a social context. Differences in social cognition are subsequently used in predictive models to predict the group affiliation of study participants. To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of an adapted emotion regulation treatment based on Dialectic Behavioral Therapy skills system (DBT-SS), the 40 study participants with ID will undergo a manual-based psychotherapy. The treatment consists of 24 group and individual sessions over 24 weeks. The treatment includes nine skill-systems. Outcome measures are administered at baseline, post-treatment, and at a 6-month follow-up. SOCIETAL RELENVANCE This research addresses a significant knowledge gap in social cognition and mental health in individuals with ID. The results may lead to a better understanding of differences in social cognition compared to individuals with ASD, and effective, targeted interventions for emotion regulation in individuals with ID. In the long run, the treatment could help reduce off-label prescription of antipsychotics to manage behavioral deviations in individuals with ID, as challenging behaviors often stem from difficulties with emotion regulation. PROJECT REALISATION The research group consists of an interdisciplinary composition of experts in neuropsychology, experimental psychology, and implementation of psychotherapeutic research. The project has obtained ethical approval and follows the principles of open science, with pre-registration of study protocols.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2028
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2028
March 12, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.1 years
February 10, 2025
March 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difficulties in emotion regulation scale (DERS-SF)
DERS-SF is a self-report questionnaire that assesses individuals' difficulties in emotion regulation. It consists of 18 questions, rated on a Likert scale of 1-5, and takes 10 minutes to complete. Total point: 18-90 Higher scores = greater emotion dysregulation
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale (CGI-S)
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale (CGI-I)
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
The Behavior Problems Inventory (BPI-01)
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 24 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Emotion regulation
EXPERIMENTALDBT-SS
Interventions
The intervention is an adapted version of skills training that stems from DBT. The text has been simplified, and illustrations have been added to facilitate learning. It consists of nine skill-systems that are delivered during 24 weeks, one group session and individual therapy session per week. A licensed psychologist is responsible for each individual treatment. Care givers or relatives are given support and encouraged to participate and help the study participant to complete their homework assignments.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinically diagnosed with mild ID based on DSM-5 criteria, corresponding to a general IQ between 52-70.
- Can read and communicate in Swedish.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of severe sensory impairments (e.g., blindness, deafness)
- Current psychosis or affective disorder; significant neurologic disorders (e.g., epilepsy) or degenerative disorder (e.g.., dementia, Parkinson's disease)
- Ongoing substance abuse
- Specific medication that enhance cognitive performance (central stimulants) or psychotropic medication that could affect task performance (anti-epileptic medication)
- Emotion regulation therapy or corresponding psychotherapy last 12 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (13)
Rosendahl-Santillo A, Lantto R, Nylander L, Thylander C, Schultz P, Brown J, Wallinius M, Westling S. Dialectical behavior therapy-skills system for cognitively challenged individuals with self-harm: a Swedish pilot study. Int J Dev Disabil. 2021 Sep 1;69(4):533-545. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2021.1965825. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37346252BACKGROUNDBrown JF, Brown MZ, Dibiasio P. Treating Individuals With Intellectual Disabilities and Challenging Behaviors With Adapted Dialectical Behavior Therapy. J Ment Health Res Intellect Disabil. 2013 Oct;6(4):280-303. doi: 10.1080/19315864.2012.700684.
PMID: 23914278BACKGROUNDLinehan MM, Wilks CR. The Course and Evolution of Dialectical Behavior Therapy. Am J Psychother. 2015;69(2):97-110. doi: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.2015.69.2.97.
PMID: 26160617BACKGROUNDJahoda A, Dagnan D, Hastings R, Gillooly A, Miller J, Baines S, Hatton C. Adapting psychological interventions for people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities: A behavioural activation exemplar. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2024 Mar;37(2):e13199. doi: 10.1111/jar.13199.
PMID: 38361369BACKGROUNDCampos-Jara R, Martinez-Salazar C, Campos-Jara C, Fernandez JM, Martinez-Garcia D, Contreras-Osorio F. Pharmacological treatment for challenging behavior in adults with intellectual disability: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Span J Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Oct-Dec;17(4):231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
PMID: 37839961BACKGROUNDKleberg JL, Willfors C, Bjorlin Avdic H, Riby D, Galazka MA, Guath M, Nordgren A, Strannegard C. Social feedback enhances learning in Williams syndrome. Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 4;13(1):164. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26055-8.
PMID: 36599864BACKGROUNDGarrison J, Erdeniz B, Done J. Prediction error in reinforcement learning: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Aug;37(7):1297-310. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.023. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
PMID: 23567522BACKGROUNDSubramanian A, Chitlangia S, Baths V. Reinforcement learning and its connections with neuroscience and psychology. Neural Netw. 2022 Jan;145:271-287. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
PMID: 34781215BACKGROUNDLittlewood M, Dagnan D, Rodgers J. Exploring the emotion regulation strategies used by adults with intellectual disabilities. Int J Dev Disabil. 2018 Jun 8;64(3):204-211. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2018.1466510.
PMID: 34141307BACKGROUNDSamson AC, Sokhn N, Van Herwegen J, Dukes D. An exploratory study on emotion regulation strategy use in individuals with Williams syndrome, autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 23;13:940872. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.940872. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 36506439BACKGROUNDJenner LA, Farran EK, Welham A, Jones C, Moss J. The use of eye-tracking technology as a tool to evaluate social cognition in people with an intellectual disability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurodev Disord. 2023 Dec 4;15(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s11689-023-09506-9.
PMID: 38044457BACKGROUNDScotland JL, McKenzie K, Cossar J, Murray A, Michie A. Recognition of facial expressions of emotion by adults with intellectual disability: Is there evidence for the emotion specificity hypothesis? Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Jan;48:69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
PMID: 26546741BACKGROUNDHermann H, Berndt N, Lytochkin A, Sappok T. Behavioural phenomena in persons with an intellectual developmental disorder according to the level of emotional development. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2022 May;66(5):483-498. doi: 10.1111/jir.12930. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
PMID: 35357054BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2025
First Posted
March 25, 2025
Study Start (Estimated)
August 15, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2028
Last Updated
March 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
To avoid identification of individual study participants