NCT06893315

Brief Summary

Episiotomies (EP) and perineal lacerations (PL) following vaginal delivery can lead to complications such as pain, edema, and infection. Currently, anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, baths, and ice packs are recommended for treatment. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBM) has emerged as a promising technology for pain management and scar healing in EP and PL. This is a cohort observational study conducted at the Maternal and Child University Hospital of the Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil. PBM adjuvant therapy is routinely applied at the bedside daily throughout the postpartum hospitalization. PBM is routinely offered to all postpartum patients during hospitalization. Patients may choose to accept or decline the use of analgesic PBM in addition to the standard therapeutic measures provided by the hospital (anti-inflammatory drugs, analgesics, baths, and ice packs). All patients who underwent EP or suffered grade 2 and 3 PL over six months are evaluated. We will analyze the data from patients who accepted the use of PBM and those who declined the use of PBM regarding the presence of pain, local healing of perineal lacerations, and episiotomies. The primary outcome is the daily pain assessment using the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) before and after PBM (hospital standard). The secondary outcome is the evaluation of perineal healing using the REEDA scale. Initially, data distribution will be tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Comparisons of NPS and REEDA scores between groups that received laser therapy and those that did not received will be performed using repeated-measures ANOVA, considering study covariates. Epidemiological and clinical data (age, sex, marital conditions, type and characteristics of labour (spontaneous or induced), newborn weight, presence of clinical complications during hospitalization ) collected directly in the patients' medical records to characterize the sample. All analyses will be conducted using SPSS 24.0 software, with a significance level of 95%.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
183

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 18, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 25, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

March 18, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

PhotobiomodulationLow-level Laser TherapyWound healingEpisiotomyPainPerineal Lacerations

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cutaneous pain

    Perception of local cutaneous pain in the perineum, assessed daily by physiotherapists before and after each PBM session by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    before and after each PBM session during the 3 days of hospitalization

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Assessment of perineal lesion healing

    Daily during hospitalization (3 days)

Study Arms (1)

Inpatient normal vaginal delivery postpartum patients

Inpatient postpartum patients during the puerperium who experienced grade 2 or 3 perineal laceration or underwent episiotomy during normal vaginal delivery who were treated during hospitalization with the standard hospital protocol for pain and local wound healing, and who were offered the use of PBM as an additional therapy by standard hospital protocol.

Radiation: Photobiomodulation TherapyOther: Hospital Standard Protocol of treatment for pain and healing

Interventions

Photobiomodulation (PBM) is a non-invasive therapy that uses low-level light, typically from lasers or Light Emission Diodes (LEDs), to stimulate cellular function and promote healing. It works by delivering specific wavelengths of light to target tissues, which enhances mitochondrial activity and increases adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production. PBM is commonly used for pain relief, reducing inflammation, and accelerating tissue repair in conditions like muscle injuries, arthritis, and skin disorders.

Inpatient normal vaginal delivery postpartum patients

Medical team evaluations are conducted daily throughout the hospitalization period, and anti-inflammatory medications (ketoprofen ), analgesics (dipyrone), and, in cases where vulvar edema is observed, ice packs are prescribed. In addition to the standard treatment described, the health care team routinely offers patients the use of laser therapy (photobiomodulation) once a day during hospitalization. Patients who agree to the laser therapy receive both treatments.Patients who do not accept receiving PBM receive exactly only the same standard routine care described. These protocols are standardized at the hospital, and this observational study did not interfere with any care practices.

Inpatient normal vaginal delivery postpartum patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility Detailsonly women in labor
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients undergoing episiotomy or patients who presented grade 2 or 3 perineal laceration during vaginal childbirth. The diagnosis of the degree of laceration is clinical and the obstetrician responsible for the patient's care treatment did so by exploring the injury and visualizing the injured structures within the hospital's care routine. Only those patients in whom the diagnosis of grade 2 or 3 perineal laceration made by the responsible care team and documented in the medical record were invited to participate in the study.

You may qualify if:

  • Adult women over 18 years of age;
  • Parturients with a gestational age equal to or greater than 37 weeks;
  • Patients who had a vaginal birth;
  • Patients undergoing episiotomy or patients who presented grade 2 or 3 perineal laceration during childbirth.

You may not qualify if:

  • Multiple pregnancy (twins);
  • Presence of fetal malformation or death identified during prenatal care or at the time of hospitalization for delivery;
  • Patients with serious complications such as severe puerperal hemorrhage or HELLP Syndrome during childbirth.
  • Patients with grade 1 or 4 perineal lacerations.
  • Presence of systemic diseases that alter the repair process.
  • Withdrawal of the nformed Consent Form" (ICF) at the request of the patient or those responsible;

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Universitário Materno-Infantil da Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa

Ponta Grossa, Paraná, 05020000, Brazil

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

Low-Level Light Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Laser TherapyTherapeuticsPhototherapy

Study Officials

  • Rebeca B Cecatto, PhD

    University of Nove de Julho

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
3 Days
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor M.D. Ph.D. Rebeca Boltes Cecatto

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2025

First Posted

March 25, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion

April 1, 2025

Study Completion

June 1, 2025

Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The raw data without identification of these patients will be saved in an open access repository such as Mendeley Data or similar. The results of this study, whether favorable or not, will be published in impact journals.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
after analysis of results
Access Criteria
The raw data without identification of these patients will be saved in an open access repository such as Mendeley Data or similar. The results of this study, whether favorable or not, will be published in impact journals.

Locations