Patient-reported Outcomes of Donor Site Healing Using Different Palatal Protection Techniques
1 other identifier
interventional
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study has been initiated to evaluate the question, "What is the best way to protect the palate after a gum graft is removed?" The overall objective is to determine if there is a difference in PROMs of donor site healing using different palatal post-operative protection techniques.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
April 6, 2025
April 1, 2025
1.3 years
March 7, 2025
April 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Evaluate postoperative pain level after autogenous gingival graft comparing 3 different palatal dressing designs
Evaluate postoperative pain level by documenting the number of pain pills taken during the initial two weeks of the healing process.
Up to 2 weeks post-operatively
Evaluate swelling and bleeding perception after autogenous gingival graft comparing 3 different palatal dressing designs
Using a Visual Analog scale (VAS) questionnaire indicating the subject's perception of swelling and bleeding following the graft. The VAS is a type of self-report tool where subjects mark a point on a continuous line to indicate the intensity of a subjective experience between two extreme anchor points (e.g., "no pain" at one end and "worst possible pain" at the other), allowing for a more nuanced response compared to a standard Likert scale. Essentially, it measures the degree of a symptom along a visual continuum.
2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months post-operative
Evaluate the willingness to retreat by the subjects after autogenous gingival graft comparing 3 different palatal dressing designs
Using a Visual Analog scale (VAS) questionnaire indicating the subject's willingness to retreat following the graft. The VAS is a type of self-report tool where subjects mark a point on a continuous line to indicate the intensity of a subjective experience between two extreme anchor points (e.g., "no pain" at one end and "worst possible pain" at the other), allowing for a more nuanced response compared to a standard Likert scale. Essentially, it measures the degree of a symptom along a visual continuum.
2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months post-operative
Study Arms (3)
Vacuum-formed retainer (VFR): plastic device
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will have both dental arches scanned using an intraoral optical scanner to generate the digital model of the jaw.. A resin model will be 3D printed generating the physical model. A palatal stent will be made out of thermoforming plastic in the model using a vacuum, The stent will cover the palate and the anterior and posterior teeth, including their occlusal and buccal surfaces bilaterally, to provide retention. On the day of the surgery, at the final stage of the surgical procedure (after the graft placement and suture of the recipient site), a collagen sponge will be positioned in the palatal wound, and non-resorbable sutures will be placed above the sponge. The previously made plastic palatal stent (VFR) will be placed in position and stabilized by mechanical retention using the palate and maxillary teeth, bilaterally. The subjects will be instructed to wear the stent uninterruptedly in the first 3 days and per their preference on the 4th day and after.
3-D printed acrylic resin stent (3DS):
EXPERIMENTALSubjects will have both dental arches scanned using an intraoral optical scanner to generate the digital model file of the patient's jaws. A palatal stent will be digitally designed. The stent will cover the palatal area to the maximum extent, respecting the limit between the hard and soft palate to avoid any discomfort or gag reflex by the subjects. At the final stage of the surgical procedure (after the graft placement and suture of the recipient site), a collagen sponge will be positioned in the palatal wound, and non-resorbable sutures will be placed above the sponge. The previously made palatal stent (3DS) will be placed in position and stabilized by mechanical retention in the palate and palatal surface of the maxillary teeth, bilaterally.
Flowable resin composite stent (FRC)
EXPERIMENTALAfter the placement of the graft and the suture of the recipient site, a collagen sponge will be positioned in the palatal wound. Then, a layer of cyanoacrylate (PeriAcryl 90HV, GluStitch) will be placed above the sponge using a microbrush. Non-resorbable sutures will be placed covering the palatal dressing, with the suture knots facing the buccal surfaces of the maxillary posterior teeth. Finally, a layer of flowable composite will be added, covering all the wound dimensions, restricted to the wound (no extension to the adjacent teeth). Flowable composite has been shown to help reduce pain using the same principal of providing a mechanical barrier to protect the palatal wound from the oral cavity. Subjects will have both dental arches scanned using an intraoral optical scanner to generate the digital model for secondary analysis.
Interventions
A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaire is a type of self-report tool where respondents mark a point on a continuous line to indicate the intensity of a subjective experience, like pain, fatigue, or happiness, between two extreme anchor points (e.g., "no pain" at one end and "worst possible pain" at the other), allowing for a more nuanced response compared to a standard Likert scale; essentially, it measures the degree of a symptom along a visual continuum.
On the day of surgery, the stent will be positioned to cover the palate and the anterior and posterior teeth, including their occlusal and buccal surfaces bilaterally, to provide retention. Vacuum-formed retainers are a common clinical practice used after harvesting a palatal graft, in order to provide a mechanical barrier to reduce post-operative pain.
On the day of surgery, the previously made palatal stent (3DS) will be placed in position and stabilized by mechanical retention in the palate and palatal surface of the maxillary teeth, bilaterally.
On the day of surgery, a layer of flowable composite will be added, covering all the wound dimensions, restricted to the wound (no extension to the adjacent teeth). Flowable composite has been shown to help reduce pain using the same principal of providing a mechanical barrier to protect the palatal wound from the oral cavity
At the 14-day, 30-day and 3-month follow-up visits, photographs of the patient's palate (Canon EOS 60D DSLR, Canon, USA) will be taken for healing evaluation as well as intraoral scans (TRIOS 4, 3Shape) of the palatal wound for linear and volumetric changes analysis.
The graft dimensions will be measured with the use of a periodontal probe and recorded on the data collection form. The professional preference in regard to technique applied and the time spent by the surgeon to adjust the stent intraorally will also be recorded in the same form.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 18 years of age
- Healthy or Mild controlled systemic diseases with no functional limitations (ASA I or ASA II)
- Sites with 1 to 3 teeth or implants requiring soft-tissue grafting
- Minimum palatal thickness of 2 mm
- Willing to participate and sign an informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with systemic conditions that could impair wound healing (i.e. diabetes, immunosuppressive, chemotherapy, etc.)
- Pregnant patients
- Patients with bleeding disorders or taking anticoagulants
- Smokers
- Patients with a history of palatal graft harvesting
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 232398, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rafael Amorim Cavalcanti de Siqueira
Virginia Commonwealth University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2025
First Posted
March 24, 2025
Study Start
March 7, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04