NCT06892496

Brief Summary

This study has been initiated to evaluate the question, "What is the best way to protect the palate after a gum graft is removed?" The overall objective is to determine if there is a difference in PROMs of donor site healing using different palatal post-operative protection techniques.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
42

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started Mar 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress89%
Mar 2025Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 7, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 7, 2025

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 24, 2025

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 6, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

March 7, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 4, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

soft tissue graftpainwound healing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Evaluate postoperative pain level after autogenous gingival graft comparing 3 different palatal dressing designs

    Evaluate postoperative pain level by documenting the number of pain pills taken during the initial two weeks of the healing process.

    Up to 2 weeks post-operatively

  • Evaluate swelling and bleeding perception after autogenous gingival graft comparing 3 different palatal dressing designs

    Using a Visual Analog scale (VAS) questionnaire indicating the subject's perception of swelling and bleeding following the graft. The VAS is a type of self-report tool where subjects mark a point on a continuous line to indicate the intensity of a subjective experience between two extreme anchor points (e.g., "no pain" at one end and "worst possible pain" at the other), allowing for a more nuanced response compared to a standard Likert scale. Essentially, it measures the degree of a symptom along a visual continuum.

    2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months post-operative

  • Evaluate the willingness to retreat by the subjects after autogenous gingival graft comparing 3 different palatal dressing designs

    Using a Visual Analog scale (VAS) questionnaire indicating the subject's willingness to retreat following the graft. The VAS is a type of self-report tool where subjects mark a point on a continuous line to indicate the intensity of a subjective experience between two extreme anchor points (e.g., "no pain" at one end and "worst possible pain" at the other), allowing for a more nuanced response compared to a standard Likert scale. Essentially, it measures the degree of a symptom along a visual continuum.

    2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months post-operative

Study Arms (3)

Vacuum-formed retainer (VFR): plastic device

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects will have both dental arches scanned using an intraoral optical scanner to generate the digital model of the jaw.. A resin model will be 3D printed generating the physical model. A palatal stent will be made out of thermoforming plastic in the model using a vacuum, The stent will cover the palate and the anterior and posterior teeth, including their occlusal and buccal surfaces bilaterally, to provide retention. On the day of the surgery, at the final stage of the surgical procedure (after the graft placement and suture of the recipient site), a collagen sponge will be positioned in the palatal wound, and non-resorbable sutures will be placed above the sponge. The previously made plastic palatal stent (VFR) will be placed in position and stabilized by mechanical retention using the palate and maxillary teeth, bilaterally. The subjects will be instructed to wear the stent uninterruptedly in the first 3 days and per their preference on the 4th day and after.

Other: Visual Analog scale (VAS) questionnaireOther: Vacuum-formed retainer (VFR) techniqueOther: Photographs of the patient's palateOther: Measuring graft dimensions

3-D printed acrylic resin stent (3DS):

EXPERIMENTAL

Subjects will have both dental arches scanned using an intraoral optical scanner to generate the digital model file of the patient's jaws. A palatal stent will be digitally designed. The stent will cover the palatal area to the maximum extent, respecting the limit between the hard and soft palate to avoid any discomfort or gag reflex by the subjects. At the final stage of the surgical procedure (after the graft placement and suture of the recipient site), a collagen sponge will be positioned in the palatal wound, and non-resorbable sutures will be placed above the sponge. The previously made palatal stent (3DS) will be placed in position and stabilized by mechanical retention in the palate and palatal surface of the maxillary teeth, bilaterally.

Other: Visual Analog scale (VAS) questionnaireOther: 3-D printed acrylic resin stent (3DS) techniqueOther: Photographs of the patient's palateOther: Measuring graft dimensions

Flowable resin composite stent (FRC)

EXPERIMENTAL

After the placement of the graft and the suture of the recipient site, a collagen sponge will be positioned in the palatal wound. Then, a layer of cyanoacrylate (PeriAcryl 90HV, GluStitch) will be placed above the sponge using a microbrush. Non-resorbable sutures will be placed covering the palatal dressing, with the suture knots facing the buccal surfaces of the maxillary posterior teeth. Finally, a layer of flowable composite will be added, covering all the wound dimensions, restricted to the wound (no extension to the adjacent teeth). Flowable composite has been shown to help reduce pain using the same principal of providing a mechanical barrier to protect the palatal wound from the oral cavity. Subjects will have both dental arches scanned using an intraoral optical scanner to generate the digital model for secondary analysis.

Other: Visual Analog scale (VAS) questionnaireOther: Flowable resin composite stent (FRC) techniqueOther: Photographs of the patient's palateOther: Measuring graft dimensions

Interventions

A Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaire is a type of self-report tool where respondents mark a point on a continuous line to indicate the intensity of a subjective experience, like pain, fatigue, or happiness, between two extreme anchor points (e.g., "no pain" at one end and "worst possible pain" at the other), allowing for a more nuanced response compared to a standard Likert scale; essentially, it measures the degree of a symptom along a visual continuum.

3-D printed acrylic resin stent (3DS):Flowable resin composite stent (FRC)Vacuum-formed retainer (VFR): plastic device

On the day of surgery, the stent will be positioned to cover the palate and the anterior and posterior teeth, including their occlusal and buccal surfaces bilaterally, to provide retention. Vacuum-formed retainers are a common clinical practice used after harvesting a palatal graft, in order to provide a mechanical barrier to reduce post-operative pain.

Vacuum-formed retainer (VFR): plastic device

On the day of surgery, the previously made palatal stent (3DS) will be placed in position and stabilized by mechanical retention in the palate and palatal surface of the maxillary teeth, bilaterally.

3-D printed acrylic resin stent (3DS):

On the day of surgery, a layer of flowable composite will be added, covering all the wound dimensions, restricted to the wound (no extension to the adjacent teeth). Flowable composite has been shown to help reduce pain using the same principal of providing a mechanical barrier to protect the palatal wound from the oral cavity

Flowable resin composite stent (FRC)

At the 14-day, 30-day and 3-month follow-up visits, photographs of the patient's palate (Canon EOS 60D DSLR, Canon, USA) will be taken for healing evaluation as well as intraoral scans (TRIOS 4, 3Shape) of the palatal wound for linear and volumetric changes analysis.

3-D printed acrylic resin stent (3DS):Flowable resin composite stent (FRC)Vacuum-formed retainer (VFR): plastic device

The graft dimensions will be measured with the use of a periodontal probe and recorded on the data collection form. The professional preference in regard to technique applied and the time spent by the surgeon to adjust the stent intraorally will also be recorded in the same form.

3-D printed acrylic resin stent (3DS):Flowable resin composite stent (FRC)Vacuum-formed retainer (VFR): plastic device

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Healthy or Mild controlled systemic diseases with no functional limitations (ASA I or ASA II)
  • Sites with 1 to 3 teeth or implants requiring soft-tissue grafting
  • Minimum palatal thickness of 2 mm
  • Willing to participate and sign an informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with systemic conditions that could impair wound healing (i.e. diabetes, immunosuppressive, chemotherapy, etc.)
  • Pregnant patients
  • Patients with bleeding disorders or taking anticoagulants
  • Smokers
  • Patients with a history of palatal graft harvesting

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Virginia Commonwealth University

Richmond, Virginia, 232398, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gingival RecessionPain

Interventions

Surveys and QuestionnairesMethodsFunctional Residual Capacity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gingival DiseasesPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesPeriodontal AtrophyNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public HealthTotal Lung CapacityLung Volume MeasurementsRespiratory Function TestsDiagnostic Techniques, Respiratory SystemDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisRespiratory Physiological PhenomenaCirculatory and Respiratory Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Rafael Amorim Cavalcanti de Siqueira

    Virginia Commonwealth University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Rafael Amorim Cavalcanti de Siqueira

CONTACT

Anamika Khosla

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study team will assign randomly which palatal post-operative protection technique the patient will undergo by utilizing a dedicated software (Research Randomizer). The study team will then initiate the fabrication of the palatal stent in cases where VFR or 3DS groups are assigned to the patient.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2025

First Posted

March 24, 2025

Study Start

March 7, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Locations