NCT06892340

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research study is to learn how a wearable nerve stimulation device, the Spark Biomedical's Sparrow Ascent System™, impacts the development of spatial disorientation and/or motion sickness in a healthy population. Spatial disorientation is when there is a "mismatch" between where a person is, and where the sense organs in their body tell them where they are. These sense organs include the inner ear (the vestibular system), the eyes (the visual system), the sense of where one's legs, back, and neck are (proprioceptive system), and one's higher thinking (cognitive centers). If spatial disorientation is severe or occurs in motion-naïve individuals, spatial disorientation can lead to motion sickness. The Sparrow Ascent System™ is a wearable, battery-operated transcutaneous auricular (ear) neurostimulation (tAN) device. This means that it uses electrical pulses to stimulate branches of nerves on and/or around the ear, specifically the "vagus" and "trigeminal" nerves. These nerves are also responsible for your sensation of nausea and your heart rate (vagus nerve), as well as headaches (trigeminal nerve). The Sparrow System utilizes a flexible earpiece with embedded hydrogel electrodes that stick to the skin, the earpiece is disposable after use. This device is already Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for use in humans and is safely used for control of symptoms in a variety of other medical conditions, such as opioid withdrawal and acute stress reaction. In this study, we will determine if the Sparrow Ascent System™ impacts the development of spatial disorientation or motion sickness.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 17, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 21, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 24, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 15, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

January 17, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 12, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Motion SicknessSimulator SicknessTrigeminal innervationTranscutaneous auricular neurostimulationSparrow AscentNeuromodulationSimulator adaption syndromeTranscutaneous vagus nerve stimulationAuricleMild electrical stimulationCranial nervesOccipital nervesCymba ConchaAfferent sensory innervationVagus NerveAuriculotemporal nerveTrigeminal nerveAuricular nerveCranial nerve VCranial nerve VIICranial nerve IXCranial nerve XNon-invasiveNon-sedating

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Graybiel Scale

    The Graybiel scale is a commonly used scale for identifying and rating motion sickness symptoms. It was designed to survey multiple dimensions of motion sickness characterized by the degree of 6 representative cardinal symptoms: Nausea and vomiting, skin color, cold sweating, increased salivation, drowsiness, pain and central nervous system symptoms. Each cardinal symptom category is rated by the participant and a corresponding score is calculated. Lesser symptoms are scored with lower point values, 1, 2 or 4 points depending on the severity of that particular symptom with higher scores indicating increased severity. More severe symptoms are scored 8 or 16 points. Values greater than or equal to 16 total points is categorized as frank sickness, 8 to 15 points is severe malaise, 5 to 7 points is moderate malaise A, 3 to 4 points is moderate malaise B, and 1 to 2 points is categorized as slight malaise.

    Baseline, and at 5- and 10-minutes post motion sickness and at 5- and 10-minutes post spatial disorientation challenges.

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Vitals: Blood pressure

    Baseline and immediately post spatial disorientation challenge and immediately post motion sickness challenge. At 90 minutes post motion sickness challenge.

  • Misery Scale (MISC)

    Baseline, and at 3 times during the spatial disorientation challenge, at 5- and 10-minutes post spatial disorientation challenge as well as 1-minute intervals during the motion sickness challenge and 5- and 10-minutes post motion sickness challenge.

  • Motion Sickness Assessment Questionnaire (MSAQ)

    Baseline, and 5- and 10-minutes post spatial disorientation challenge and 5- and 10-minutes post motion sickness challenge.

  • Simulator sickness questionnaire (SSQ)

    Baseline and at 5- and 10-minutes post spatial disorientation challenge and 5- and 10-minutes post motion sickness challenge.

  • Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire

    Baseline

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Sham Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation Device (Group 2)

NO INTERVENTION

The Sparrow Ascent Clinical Tool will be used to designate the tAN device as either active or sham. For participants randomized to the sham tAN group (Group 2), the Sparrow Ascent device will be programmed to sham settings. The participant receives a device that is turned on at the time of earpiece placement but does not provide electric stimulation. The subjects will remain blinded to their group assignment. At each interaction with the subject, the research coordinator will inform the subject that the device may be activated, and they may or may not feel stimulation at the time of activation. Subjects will then undergo spatial disorientation and motion sickness challenges. Vital signs will be obtained at specific time markers, and questionnaires and assessments completed.

Active Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulator Device (Group 1)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Sparrow Ascent Clinical Tool will be used to designate the tAN device as either active or sham. For participants randomized to the active tAN group (Group 1), the Sparrow Ascent device will be programmed to the preset stimulation parameters. If the participant states that the stimulation intensity is discomforting, the research coordinator will gradually decrease/increase until a comfortable stimulation intensity is achieved. After the device is programmed, participants' stimulation amplitude (in mA) will be documented. The subjects will remain blinded to their group assignment. At each interaction with the subject, the research coordinator will inform the subject that the device may be activated, and they may or may not feel stimulation at the time of activation. Subjects will then undergo spatial disorientation and motion sickness challenges. Vital signs will be obtained at specific time markers, and questionnaires and assessments completed.

Device: Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation device

Interventions

The Sparrow Ascent device will be programmed to the preset stimulation parameters. Two individual stimulation frequencies will be set: 15 Hz at cymba concha (Region 1/Channel 1; vagal innervation) and 100 Hz adjacently anterior to the tragus (Region 2/Channel 2; trigeminal innervation). The pulse duration will be set to 250 #s for all participants. The stimulation intensities (mA) will be set to 1.0 and 1.4 (for Region 1 and 2, respectively) based on the median values observed in the previous data set. If the participant states that the stimulation intensity is discomforting, the research coordinator will gradually decrease/increase until a comfortable stimulation intensity is achieved

Active Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulator Device (Group 1)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy males and non-pregnant females between the ages of 18-50 who do not experience symptoms of motion sickness.
  • Participants who are English speaking.
  • Participants who are able to read and understand study procedures in order to provide informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Females who are pregnant
  • Cardiac pathology (congestive heart failure, history of myocardial infarction, cardiac stent placement, pacemaker placement, heart surgery)
  • Hypertension requiring daily medication
  • Active vestibular disease to include Meniere's disease, migraine associated vertigo, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo, labyrinthitis
  • Neck pain or spinal pathology
  • Medications impacting cardiac, vestibular, or neurologic function
  • Recently ill or hospitalized within 30 days
  • Pilots and individuals formally desensitized to motion sickness
  • Use of vestibular suppressing medications or drugs within 24 hours of the study (antihistamines, histamine-1 receptor agonists, benzodiazepines, anticholinergics, dopamine receptor agonists, alcohol, marijuana, tobacco, opiates)
  • Participant has a history of epileptic seizures
  • Participant has a history of neurological diseases or traumatic brain injury
  • Abnormal vital signs obtained during pre-experimentation phase:
  • Heart Rate \>100 or \<50
  • Systolic blood pressure \>150 or \<90
  • Respiratory rate \>24 or \<8 13. Participant has presence of devices, e.g., pacemakers, cochlear prosthesis, neurostimulators 14. Participant has abnormal ear anatomy or ear infection present 15. Participant has any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Randolph AFB Physiology lab

San Antonio, Texas, 78148, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (23)

  • Heinle, Todd E. and William R. Ercoline. "Spatial Disorientation: Causes, Consequences and Countermeasures for the USAF." (2003).

    BACKGROUND
  • Mark S. George, Ziad Nahas, Daryl E. Bohning, Qiwen Mu, F. Andrew Kozel, Jeffrey Borckhardt, Stewart Denslow, Mechanisms of action of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), Clinical Neuroscience Research, Volume 4, Issues 1-2, 2004, Pages 71-79, ISSN 1566-2772, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnr.2004.06.006.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ebenholtz SM, Cohen MM, Linder BJ. The possible role of nystagmus in motion sickness: a hypothesis. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Nov;65(11):1032-5.

    PMID: 7840743BACKGROUND
  • Rogers D, Van Syoc D. Clinical Practice Guideline for Motion Sickness. November 2011. http://www.asams. org/guidelines/Completed/NEW%20Motion%20Sickness.htm. Accessed January 11, 2022.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kramer MR, Wasserman EB, Teel EF, et al Effect of protective helmets on vision and sensory performance. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2017;51:A65.

    BACKGROUND
  • Caserman, P., Garcia-Agundez, A., Gámez Zerban, A. et al. Cybersickness in current-generation virtual reality head-mounted displays: systematic review and outlook. Virtual Reality 25, 1153-1170 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00513-6

    BACKGROUND
  • Chan G, Moochhala SM, Zhao B, Wl Y, Wong J. A comparison of motion sickness prevalence between seafarers and non-seafarers onboard naval platforms. Int Marit Health. 2006;57(1-4):56-65.

    PMID: 17312694BACKGROUND
  • Antunano MJ, Hernandez JM. Incidence of airsickness among military parachutists. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1989 Aug;60(8):792-7.

    PMID: 2775137BACKGROUND
  • Jenkins DD, Khodaparast N, O'Leary GH, Washburn SN, Covalin A, Badran BW. Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation (tAN): A Novel Adjuvant Treatment in Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Mar 8;15:648556. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.648556. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 33762918BACKGROUND
  • Tirado CF, Washburn SN, Covalin A, Hedenberg C, Vanderpool H, Benner C, Powell DP, McWade MA, Khodaparast N. Delivering transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN) to improve symptoms associated with opioid withdrawal: results from a prospective clinical trial. Bioelectron Med. 2022 Aug 18;8(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s42234-022-00095-x.

    PMID: 35978394BACKGROUND
  • Cowings PS, Toscano WB, DeRoshia C, Tauso R. Effects of Command and Control Vehicle (C2V) operational environment on soldier health and performance. Hum Perf Extrem Environ. 2001 Jun;5(2):66-91.

    PMID: 14649629BACKGROUND
  • Molefi E, McLoughlin I, Palaniappan R. On the potential of transauricular electrical stimulation to reduce visually induced motion sickness. Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 25;13(1):3272. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29765-9.

    PMID: 36841838BACKGROUND
  • Bauer S, Baier H, Baumgartner C, Bohlmann K, Fauser S, Graf W, Hillenbrand B, Hirsch M, Last C, Lerche H, Mayer T, Schulze-Bonhage A, Steinhoff BJ, Weber Y, Hartlep A, Rosenow F, Hamer HM. Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tVNS) for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial (cMPsE02). Brain Stimul. 2016 May-Jun;9(3):356-363. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Jan 20.

    PMID: 27033012BACKGROUND
  • McIntire LK, McKinley RA, Goodyear C, McIntire JP, Brown RD. Cervical transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (ctVNS) improves human cognitive performance under sleep deprivation stress. Commun Biol. 2021 Jun 10;4(1):634. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02145-7.

    PMID: 34112935BACKGROUND
  • Yakunina N, Kim SS, Nam EC. Optimization of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Using Functional MRI. Neuromodulation. 2017 Apr;20(3):290-300. doi: 10.1111/ner.12541. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

    PMID: 27898202BACKGROUND
  • Frangos E, Ellrich J, Komisaruk BR. Non-invasive Access to the Vagus Nerve Central Projections via Electrical Stimulation of the External Ear: fMRI Evidence in Humans. Brain Stimul. 2015 May-Jun;8(3):624-36. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.018. Epub 2014 Dec 6.

    PMID: 25573069BACKGROUND
  • Badran BW, Dowdle LT, Mithoefer OJ, LaBate NT, Coatsworth J, Brown JC, DeVries WH, Austelle CW, McTeague LM, George MS. Neurophysiologic effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) via electrical stimulation of the tragus: A concurrent taVNS/fMRI study and review. Brain Stimul. 2018 May-Jun;11(3):492-500. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 29.

    PMID: 29361441BACKGROUND
  • Babic T, Browning KN. The role of vagal neurocircuits in the regulation of nausea and vomiting. Eur J Pharmacol. 2014 Jan 5;722:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.08.047. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

    PMID: 24184670BACKGROUND
  • Suzuki T, Sugiyama Y, Yates BJ. Integrative responses of neurons in parabrachial nuclei to a nauseogenic gastrointestinal stimulus and vestibular stimulation in vertical planes. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2012 Apr 15;302(8):R965-75. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00680.2011. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

    PMID: 22277934BACKGROUND
  • Balaban CD. Projections from the parabrachial nucleus to the vestibular nuclei: potential substrates for autonomic and limbic influences on vestibular responses. Brain Res. 2004 Jan 16;996(1):126-37. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2003.10.026.

    PMID: 14670639BACKGROUND
  • Zhao Q, Ning BF, Zhou JY, Wang J, Yao YJ, Peng ZY, Yuan ZL, Chen JDZ, Xie WF. Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation Ameliorates Motion Sickness Induced by Rotary Chair in Healthy Subjects: A Prospective Randomized Crossover Study. Neuromodulation. 2022 Dec;25(8):1421-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Dec 18.

    PMID: 35088725BACKGROUND
  • Eren OE, Filippopulos F, Sonmez K, Mohwald K, Straube A, Schoberl F. Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation significantly improves quality of life in patients with persistent postural-perceptual dizziness. J Neurol. 2018 Oct;265(Suppl 1):63-69. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8894-8. Epub 2018 May 21.

    PMID: 29785522BACKGROUND
  • Muth ER. Motion and space sickness: intestinal and autonomic correlates. Auton Neurosci. 2006 Oct 30;129(1-2):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2006.07.020. Epub 2006 Sep 6.

    PMID: 16950658BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motion Sickness

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Isaac D Erbele, MD, ENT

    Brooke Army Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Isaac D Erbele, MD, ENT

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The participants and investigator will be blind to participant treatment group assignment. Only the research coordinator will know the treatment group assignment.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled investigation of the effects of transcutaneous auricular neurostimulation (tAN) on spatial disorientation and motion sickness. Participants will be recruited from a motion-naïve population and randomized into two groups: Group 1 (n = 18): Active tAN initiated 45-minutes before simulated disorientation Group 2 (n = 18): Passive Sham tAN Experimentation will take place in 5 stages: (Pre-experimentation) 1\) prior to spatial disorientation challenge, 2) spatial disorientation challenge, 3) between challenges, 4) motion sickness challenge, 5) conclusion At the conclusion of pre-experimentation, the subjects will be placed with a tAN earpiece on their left ear. A tAN device will be programmed based on the participant study group and will be connected to the participant's earpiece.
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2025

First Posted

March 24, 2025

Study Start

February 21, 2025

Primary Completion

October 31, 2025

Study Completion

October 31, 2025

Last Updated

August 15, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All IPD that underlie results in a publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
After publication to 6 years after publication.
Access Criteria
Researchers may contact the principal investigator for access. Available data will include subject demographics, study group, and instruments values.

Locations