Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Versus Dry Needling in Non Specific Chronic Neck Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compare between the effectiveness of Acupuncture-Like Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (Acupuncture-like TENS) and dry needling on pain intensity, Pressure pain threshold (PPT) of upper trapezius myofascial trigger points, neck range of motion, and neck function in patients with non specific chronic neck pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2025
CompletedMarch 24, 2025
March 1, 2025
2 months
March 18, 2025
March 18, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Assessment of neck pain intensity
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) will be used to evaluate pain intensity. It is a horizontal line whose length is 10 cm; its left end (zero) indicates no pain, while its right end (ten) reveals the worst imaginable pain. Each subject will be in relaxed position and will be asked to mark the point on the line that exactly corresponded to his/her pain.
4 weeks
Assessment of pressure pain threshold (PPT)
The pressure pain threshold (PPT) will be assessed by positioning the tip of the algometer on the trigger point and increasing the pressure by 1 kg per second. When the patient indicates discomfort, the pressure value will be recorded in kg/cm. The procedure will be repeated three times at 60 s intervals, and the mean pressure value will be recorded as the PPT.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Measurement of cervical flexion range of motion (ROM)
4 weeks
Measurement of cervical extension ROM
4 weeks
Measurement of cervical lateral flexion to the right ROM
4 weeks
Measurement of cervical lateral flexion to the left ROM
4 weeks
Measurement of cervical rotation to the right ROM
4 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Acupuncture-like TENS + Conventional treatment
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive acupuncture like TENS with conventional treatment for 4 weeks.
Dry needling + Conventional treatment
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive dry needling with conventional treatment for 4 weeks.
Conventional treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will receive conventional treatment for 4 weeks.
Interventions
The first experimental group will receive 20-minute sessions of TENS, where participants adjust the amplitude to achieve strong muscle twitching beneath the electrodes at an intensity below the pain threshold. Acupuncture-like TENS uses high-frequency pulsed currents at two trains per second with an internal pulse frequency of 100 pps. The pulse pattern is set to "burst," with an asymmetrical biphasic waveform and a pulse duration of 200 µs. Minor fluctuations in pulse rate between 100 and 104 pps were noted using a cathode ray oscilloscope before the experiment.
The second experimental group will receive 20-minute sessions of dry needling. Patients will be positioned in a prone, relaxed position, and the overlying skin will be cleaned with alcohol. The muscle will be palpated to locate the trigger point (MTrP), with the muscle grasped between the thumb, index, and middle fingers. A solid filiform needle within a guide tube will be inserted into the MTrP using a tapping motion at an oblique angle. The upper trapezius muscle will be palpated for trigger points, with needle insertion depths ranging from 10-15mm. After obtaining a local twitch response, the needle will be moved vertically 3-5mm until no more twitch responses occur. This group will also receive 20 minutes of conventional physical therapy.
All participants in the three groups will receive conventional treatment in the form of hot pack treatment followed by active range of movement (AROM) exercises. A hot pack will be placed on the patients cervical, paraspinal, and upper thoracic areas (including the upper trapezius muscle with aMTrP) for 20 minutes. This will be followed by AROM exercise for cervical spine joints. Participants were asked to actively flex the neck so that the head dropped toward the contralateral trapezius muscles. Patients then rotated the head toward ipsilateral side. This exercise will be repeated five times.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Having at least 1 active trigger point in upper trapezius muscles will use a recommended diagnostic criterion to find active MTrPs which is:
- The presence of a palpable taut band in the skeletal muscle.
- The presence of a hypersensitive spot in the taut band.
- Local twitch response provoked by snapping palpation.
- Production of a typical referred pain pattern in response to the compression of tender spots.
- Spontaneous presence of the typical referred pain pattern.
- Duration of symptoms of acute stage (2-4) weeks.
- Age between (20-40) years.
- Having a normal neurological examination result .
You may not qualify if:
- Existence of cervical disc hernia, advanced cervical osteoarthritis, radiculopathy, or myelopathy.
- Having trigger point injection or physical therapy in the last 6 months.
- Having a rheumatologic disease, such as fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, or a hormonal disease, such as hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism or hyperparathyroidism.
- Existence of kyphosis, scoliosis, forward head posture or cervicogenic headache.
- History of spine surgery.
- Having a cardiovascular problem.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Zagazig general hospital
Zagazig, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Neveen Abdel Latif Abdel Raoof, PhD
Professor, Cairo university
Central Study Contacts
Rania Reda Mohamed, PhD
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2025
First Posted
March 24, 2025
Study Start
March 25, 2025
Primary Completion
May 25, 2025
Study Completion
May 31, 2025
Last Updated
March 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03