Evaluation of the Pain Relief Effect of Battlefield Acupuncture on Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Lumbar Spine Degeneration.
A Randomized Control Trail: Evaluation of the Pain Relief Effect of Battlefield Acupuncture on Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Due to Lumbar Spine Degeneration.
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The Global Burden of Disease's 2023 study shows that lower back pain affects over 619 million people worldwide, with projections reaching 843 million by 2050. It is a common symptom of lumbar spine degeneration, with 84.2% of patients experiencing it. To address this issue, Vietnam's Ministry of Health has released guidelines on "Lumbar Spine Pain" (Yêu thống), combining traditional and modern medicine, including acupuncture, to alleviate pain. However, to achieve better treatment outcomes, the combination of multiple interventions, such as different types of acupuncture, is required. Additionally, the USAF's Integrative Medicine and Acupuncture Center released guidelines in 2021 for Battlefield Acupuncture (BFA), a rapid, safe, and effective pain relief method. Internationally, there are studies on BFA for various types of pain, including lower back pain, but none in Vietnam. Therefore, the investigators conducted this study to evaluate the effects of BFA combined with electroacupuncture and pain medication on chronic lower back pain patients with lumbar spine degeneration in Vietnam.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2025
CompletedSeptember 19, 2025
September 1, 2025
5 months
February 26, 2025
September 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Visual Analog Scale
The Visual analog scale is a continuous scale consisting of a horizontal line (HVAS) or a vertical line (VVAS), typically 10 cm (100 mm) in length. The scale is usually anchored at both ends with the descriptors "no pain" (score 0) and "worst imaginable pain" (score 100 \[100 mm scale\]). To avoid clustering scores around a preferred number, intermediate points should not be numbered or verbally described. The timing of data collection varies between different studies or examinations, but most respondents are asked to report pain intensity "currently" or pain intensity "in the past 24 hours."
Baseline, during procedure
Brief Pain inventory
The BPI is a self-assessment scale for sensory aspects and responses to pain. The scale includes two parts: pain intensity and the degree of impact on various aspects of life. The impact is assessed in different areas of daily living such as sleep, mobility, and emotional well-being. The survey period can be either 7 days or 24 hours. IMMPACT (Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials) recommends that BPI be used for clinical trials with patients suffering from chronic pain. BPI begins with a screening question about the location of the pain that the patient feels needs attention. The main sections include pain intensity scale and the impact of pain. A numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 is used for all items. The endpoints for the pain intensity scale are 0 = 'no pain' and 10 = 'pain as bad as you can imagine', while the endpoints for the quality-of-life scale are 0 = 'no impact' and 10 = 'total impact'.
Baseline, session 1st, session 5th, session 10th
Pain medication used
The use of pain medications serves as an indicator of the efficacy of acupuncture as a pain-relief intervention. An increased dependence on analgesic medications among patients signifies a diminished therapeutic effect of acupuncture in alleviating pain symptoms.
During procedure
Study Arms (2)
Experiment
EXPERIMENTALAuricular acupuncture + Electro acupuncture + Pain medication
Sham Comparator
SHAM COMPARATORSham ear acupuncture + Electro acupuncture + Pain medication
Interventions
(According to the guidelines provided in the "BFA - Acupuncture Manual" of the USAF Center for Integrative and Complementary Medicine.) Procedure: * Practitioner: Traditional medicine doctor with a practicing certificate. * Tools: Khanh Phong auricular acupuncture needles (license: 287/BYTYDCT) * Before needling: Disinfect the skin on both outer ears. * Insertion depth: Auricular needles penetrate the skin to a depth of 1.3 mm. Insert the auricular needles alternately on the right and left sides at the following acupoints: Cingulate gyrus, Subcortex, Omega 2, Shen Men, and Zero point. The insertion process stops when one of the following three criteria is met: (1) The patient experiences a 40% reduction in pain on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), (2) The patient refuses to continue the insertion, or (3) A total of 10 needles have been inserted. * After needling: Patient may feel slight pain in the ear area or de qi (a sensation of aching, warmth, and redness at the needling site).
According to the "Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases by Traditional Medicine, combining Traditional Medicine with Modern Medicine" - 2020 - Ministry of Health of Viet Nam. Procedure: * Practitioner: Traditional medicine doctor with a practicing certificate. * Tools: Khánh Phong ARLO acupuncture needles, size 0.3 x 25 mm (lincense: TKHQ:102664344900) * Disinfect the lumbar region skin. * Needle insertion: Insert needles perpendicular to the patient's skin, to a depth of 20 mm. Location: Dai truong du (BL25), Than du (BL23), Jiaji at L4-L5, L5-S1 (Ex-B2), Uy trung (BL40), Yeu duong quan (GV3). After insertion, attach the electrode clips to the needle ends. * Electric stimulation: Use a current of 100Hz for 20 minutes - mixed wave. * Post-needling: Patient may feel a sensation of de qi (aching, warmth, and redness at the needling site).
According to the "Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diseases by Traditional Medicine, combining Traditional Medicine with Modern Medicine" - 2020 - Ministry of Health of Viet Nam. * Prescriber: Traditional medicine doctor with a practicing certificate. * Paracetamol 500mg x 9 tablets: Take 1 tablet per dose, to be used when the pain score on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is ≥ 30mm, not exceeding 6 tablets/day. (If the patient still has medication from the previous visit, only prescribe the total amount needed to make up 9 tablets).
Study uses patches with non-skin-penetrating cotton, at the intervention acupoint areas. Using acupoints matching with the intervention group helps reduce the patients' ability to predict their study group, and the non-penetrating and non-rotating cotton ensure that there is no analgesic effect on the lumbar area caused by auriculotherapy. Acupoint location: Cingulate gyrus, Subcortex, Omega 2, Shen Men, and Zero points
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 20 years and older.
- Patients diagnosed with lumbar spine degeneration (Imaging and clinical criteria according to the "Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Musculoskeletal Diseases" - Ministry of Health of Viet Nam 2014; AAFP-2024).
- Patients with back pain with a VAS score of ≥ 50mm, continuous or recurrent with the same initial diagnosed cause, lasting from the time of initial diagnosis to the time of study participation for ≥ 3 months.
- Individuals who have never used auricular acupuncture.
- Voluntarily agree to participate in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals with cognitive disorders (Glasgow \< 13 points).
- Individuals are allergic to any component of the ear acupressure seeds, or experiencing anxiety, fear of needles, or with a history of acupuncture syncope.
- Patients with symptoms of saddle anesthesia, urinary or fecal incontinence, paresthesia or muscle atrophy, progressive muscle weakness.
- History of cancer or currently undergoing cancer treatment, or unexplained weight loss.
- Patients who are awakened at night due to back pain.
- Patients contraindicated the medication used in the study: paracetamol.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
- Patients are currently experiencing systemic infection.
- Individuals with unhealed wounds, ear or lumbar region infections.
- Currently participating in an intervention study with another drug or device.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Traditional Chinese Medicine faculty - Thống Nhất Hospital
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
University medical center HCMC branch 3
Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Related Publications (9)
Song CY, Chen CH, Chen TW, Chiang HY, Hsieh CL. Assessment of Low Back Pain: Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change of the Brief Pain Inventory. Am J Occup Ther. 2022 May 1;76(3):7603205040. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2022.044420.
PMID: 35301518BACKGROUNDHawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available.
PMID: 22588748BACKGROUNDBielewicz J, Daniluk B, Kamieniak P. VAS and NRS, Same or Different? Are Visual Analog Scale Values and Numerical Rating Scale Equally Viable Tools for Assessing Patients after Microdiscectomy? Pain Res Manag. 2022 Mar 29;2022:5337483. doi: 10.1155/2022/5337483. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35391853BACKGROUNDMurakami M, Fox L, Dijkers MP. Ear Acupuncture for Immediate Pain Relief-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Med. 2017 Mar 1;18(3):551-564. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw215.
PMID: 28395101BACKGROUNDMatz PG, Meagher RJ, Lamer T, Tontz WL Jr, Annaswamy TM, Cassidy RC, Cho CH, Dougherty P, Easa JE, Enix DE, Gunnoe BA, Jallo J, Julien TD, Maserati MB, Nucci RC, O'Toole JE, Rosolowski K, Sembrano JN, Villavicencio AT, Witt JP. Guideline summary review: An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine J. 2016 Mar;16(3):439-48. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.11.055. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
PMID: 26681351BACKGROUNDFox LM, Murakami M, Danesh H, Manini AF. Battlefield acupuncture to treat low back pain in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;36(6):1045-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.02.038. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
PMID: 29550099BACKGROUNDMao JJ, Liou KT, Baser RE, Bao T, Panageas KS, Romero SAD, Li QS, Gallagher RM, Kantoff PW. Effectiveness of Electroacupuncture or Auricular Acupuncture vs Usual Care for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Among Cancer Survivors: The PEACE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 May 1;7(5):720-727. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0310.
PMID: 33734288BACKGROUNDHướng dẫn Chẩn đoán và Điều trị bệnh theo Y học cổ truyền, kết hợp Y học cổ truyền với Y học hiện đại (2020).
BACKGROUNDGBD 2021 Low Back Pain Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990-2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023 May 22;5(6):e316-e329. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00098-X. eCollection 2023 Jun.
PMID: 37273833BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor of Philosophy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2025
First Posted
March 13, 2025
Study Start
March 15, 2025
Primary Completion
July 31, 2025
Study Completion
August 31, 2025
Last Updated
September 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share