Using Clinical Decision Support to Provide Social Risk-Informed Care for Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency Department
2 other identifiers
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The overarching goal of this proposal is to integrate patient social risk information into an existing electronic health record (EHR)-based clinical decision support (CDS) tool (CDSv1) to facilitate emergency department (ED)-initiated, social risk-informed opioid use disorder (OUD) medication treatment and ultimately improve treatment adherence and follow up. The investigators will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the social care-enhanced CDS tool, CDSv2, (compared to CDSv1) at a single study site (UCSF) as an intervention to increase medication treatment adherence and follow up for adult ED patients experiencing opioid use disorder using a mixed-methods, before-after approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
May 7, 2025
May 1, 2025
2.2 years
March 6, 2025
May 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (19)
CDSv1 clinician launch
Percentage of ED clinicians who launch CDSv1 for patients with OUD
12 months
CDSv1 encounter launch
Percentage of eligible encounters (i.e., encounters including patients with OUD as defined by the EHR-derived phenotype) where CDSv1 was launched by clinician
12 months
CDSv2 clinician launch
Percentage of ED clinicians who launch CDSv2 for patients with OUD
12 months
CDSv2 encounter launch
Percentage of eligible encounters (i.e., encounters including patients with OUD as defined by the EHR-derived phenotype) where CDSv2 was launched by clinician
12 months
CDSv1 adherence to OUD treatment recommendations
For ED visits in which CDSv1 is launched, investigators will assess the percentage of times either buprenorphine, methadone, or naltrexone was prescribed by an ED clinician
12 months
CDSv2 adherence to OUD treatment recommendations
For ED visits in which CDSv2 is launched, investigators will assess the percentage of times either buprenorphine, methadone, or naltrexone was prescribed by an ED clinician
12 months
CDSv2 adherence to social care recommendations
For ED visits in which CDSv2 is launched, investigators will assess the percentage of times social care recommendations (to be determined, based on results from Aim 2) were followed by ED clinicians
12 months
CDSv1 acceptability
Acceptability of Intervention Measure 4-item survey to assess clinician acceptability of CDSv1. Response scales range from "1 = Completely disagree" to "5 = Completely agree", with higher scores indicating greater success.
During first 6 months of CDSv1 deployment
CDSv1 appropriateness
Intervention Appropriateness Measure 4-item survey to assess clinician perception of CDSv1 appropriateness. Response scales range from "1 = Completely disagree" to "5 = Completely agree", with higher scores indicating greater success.
During first 6 months of CDSv1 deployment
CDSv2 acceptability
Acceptability of Intervention Measure 4-item survey to assess clinician acceptability of CDSv2. Response scales range from "1 = Completely disagree" to "5 = Completely agree", with higher scores indicating greater success.
During first 6 months of CDSv2 deployment
CDSv2 appropriateness
Intervention Appropriateness Measure 4-item survey to assess clinician perception of CDSv2 appropriateness. Response scales range from "1 = Completely disagree" to "5 = Completely agree", with higher scores indicating greater success.
During first 6 months of CDSv2 deployment
Patient recruitment CDSv1
Number of patients who receive OUD medication as a result of CDSv1 who are enrolled for primary outcome ascertainment
12 months
Patient recruitment CDSv2
Number of patients who receive OUD medication as a result of CDSv2 who are enrolled for primary outcome ascertainment
12 months
ED clinicians' perceptions of CDSv1
Themes emerging from semi-structured qualitative interviews exploring clinician perceptions of CDSv1
Within first 8 months of CDSv1 deployment
ED patients' perceptions of CDSv1
Themes emerging from semi-structured qualitative interviews exploring patient perceptions of receiving treatment from CDSv1
Within first 8 months of CDSv1 deployment
ED clinicians' perceptions of CDSv2
Themes emerging from semi-structured qualitative interviews exploring clinician perceptions of CDSv2
Within first 8 months of CDSv2 deployment
ED patients' perceptions of CDSv2
Themes emerging from semi-structured qualitative interviews exploring patient perceptions of receiving social risk-informed treatment from CDSv2
Within first 8 months of CDSv2 deployment
Feasibility of primary endpoint collection for CDSv1
Percentage of participants for whom data on OUD medication adherence and follow up are successfully collected at 30 days for CDSv1
13 months
Feasibility of primary endpoint collection for CDSv2
Percentage of participants for whom data on OUD medication adherence and follow up are successfully collected at 30 days for CDSv2
13 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
CDSv1 treatment adherence
13 months
CDSv1 follow up
13 months
CDSv2 treatment adherence
13 months
CDSv2 follow up
13 months
Study Arms (2)
ED-Based Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder
ACTIVE COMPARATOREmergency providers will have access to the basic ED-based clinical decision support tool for opioid use disorder.
Social Care-Enhanced Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorder
EXPERIMENTALEmergency providers will no longer have access to the basic ED-based clinical decision support tool for opioid use disorder, but will instead have access to the social care-enhanced clinical decision support tool for opioid use disorder.
Interventions
The original clinical decision support (CDS) tool, EMergency department initiated BuprenorphinE for opioid use Disorder or EMBED, was designed by researchers at Yale to support emergency department (ED) clinicians with varying levels of experience prescribing buprenorphine for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD). The tool alerts ED providers of a patient who is potentially eligible for MOUD using Epic's storyboard. The provider must then click on the notification to open the OUD evaluation tool, which has multiple components: OUD assessment, OUD diagnosis, withdrawal assessment, and readiness for treatment. These components are then paired with an orderset, "ED Opioid Use Disorder Treatment" that includes nursing orders, prescriptions for buprenorphine and ancillary medications, and substance use disorder discharge resources.
The investigators will use human-centered design to adapt the basic CDS tool to incorporate patient social needs, involving patients, staff, and end-user ED clinicians in the iterative design process. This tool is being actively developed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All University of California, San Francisco ED providers (residents, attendings, advanced practice providers) who have used either CDSv1 or CDSv2 will be eligible to participate in surveys and interviews regarding feasibility and acceptability.
- English-speaking patients ≥18 years of age presenting to the UCSF ED with opioid use disorder who receive medication treatment (as a result of CDSv1 or CDSv2) will be eligible to participate.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Participants will be excluded if:
- they have a medical or psychiatric condition requiring hospitalization at the index ED visit,
- are actively suicidal, are cognitively impaired,
- present from an extended care facility, or
- require opioids for a pain condition.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Melanie F Molina, MD, MAS
University of California, San Francisco
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2025
First Posted
March 12, 2025
Study Start
April 20, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
May 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share