Dynamic Gait Index as a Functional Gait Assessment Measure in Children With JIA
Investigation of Validity and Reliability of Dynamic Walking Index in Childhood Rheumatic Diseases
1 other identifier
observational
52
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is one of the most common chronic rheumatic diseases seen in childhood. Pain, joint swelling and loss of function caused by inflammation significantly reduce the patients' quality of life and lead to muscle weakness, limited range of motion and gait disorders. Although there are various clinical assessment methods, there is no functional test in the current literature that evaluates walking in children with JIA. The Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) is a functional walking scale that evaluates walking on level ground, walking while changing speed, walking with sideways head turns, walking with vertical head turns, walking with pivot turns, walking by jumping over obstacles, going around obstacles and climbing stairs. While the DGA is widely used in the clinical assessment of walking in older adults and other pediatric patient groups, it has not yet been investigated for the assessment of walking difficulties in children with JIA. This study aimed to determine whether the DYI is a usable tool for assessing walking in children with JIA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Feb 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 11, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
ExpectedNovember 28, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.1 years
March 5, 2025
November 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Dynamic Gait Index
The DGI consists of 8 items: walking on level ground, walking with changing speed, walking with sideways head turns, walking with vertical head turns, walking with pivot turns, walking over obstacles, going around obstacles, and climbing stairs. Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (severe impairment) to 3 (normal ability to walk without a walking aid). The total score is 24. Scores below 19 indicate a risk of falling, while scores above 22 describe safe ambulation.
Baseline and after 2 weeks from the baseline evaluation
Walking speed
For the walking speed assessment, participants will be asked to walk along a 10-meter walkway at their preferred speed. Before the test, participants will be asked to walk 5 laps on the walkway and will be allowed to get used to the environment. During the walk, a video recording will be made in order to calculate the walking speed. For each participant, a video recording will be made with a camera fixed on a tripod placed laterally. During the walk, the participant's walking speed will be evaluated with the Kinovea 2D motion analysis program (Kinovea 0.8.15., GPLv2 license, 2019). Participants will be asked to walk 7 laps along the walkway, and the average data of these laps and the time taken to walk the 10-meter walkway in each lap will be recorded.
Baseline
Timed Up and Go Test
The TUG test measures the time it takes for a person to get up from an arm-supported chair, walk 3 m, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The person walks at the preferred speed in their usual shoes with or without a walking aid. The tester remains with the participants at all times to ensure safety. Before starting the movement, the movement is demonstrated and explained to the child. The time it takes to get up from the chair and sit back in it is recorded. The test is repeated twice and the fastest score is recorded. Times less than 10 seconds are considered normal, while times greater than 14 seconds are recorded as a high risk of falling.
Baseline
Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale
The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale is a pain rating scale used to show children their pain intensity levels. On this scale, a person who feels happy indicates that they feel no pain (no pain), while a person who feels sad indicates that they feel a little or a lot of pain, Face 0 is very happy because they feel no pain. Face 10 visually represents severe pain that leads to crying. Participants will be asked to choose the face that best describes their pain from the scale before and after taping to assess pain.
Baseline
Pediatric Balance Scale
To detect balance loss in children, the Pediatric Balance Scale, which is a modified version of the Berg balance scale and is used to assess functional balance skills in school-aged children, will be applied. The scale consists of 14 items, scored from 0 (lowest function) to 4 (highest function), with a maximum score of 56. The Pediatric Balance Scale is designed for use in school-aged children with mild to moderate motor impairments. Pilot testing was conducted on children aged 5 to 15 years.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Childhood Health Assessment Questionnarie
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
Patient group
This group will be created with children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Healthy control group
This group will be created with age matched healthy volunteers.
Interventions
The physical examination will included Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), Walking speed, Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale, Pediatric balance scale and CHAQ (Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire).
The DGI, whose validity and reliability will be investigated, consists of 8 items: walking on level ground, walking with changing speed, walking with sideways head turns, walking with vertical head turns, walking with pivot turns, walking over obstacles, going around obstacles, and climbing stairs. Performance on each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (severe impairment) to 3 (normal walking ability without a walking aid). The total score is 24. Scores below 19 indicate a risk of falling, while scores above 22 define safe ambulation.
Eligibility Criteria
Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
You may qualify if:
- Study Group;
- Having a JIA diagnosis according to ILAR criteria between the ages of 8-16,
- Having unilateral knee joint involvement that will affect walking
- Being compatible, volunteer and cooperative in the study Control Group;
- Not having any neurological or orthopedic diagnosis
- Being between the ages of 8-16
- Being at a mental level that can understand the commands of the person performing the evaluation
You may not qualify if:
- Study Group;
- Having an additional neurological or orthopedic diagnosis accompanying JIA and affecting treatment results,
- Having lower extremity asymmetry or active lower extremity involvement other than the knee joint that will affect walking.
- Control Group;
- Having any health problem that may affect the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Istanbul University - Cerrahpasalead
- Medipol Universitycollaborator
- Istanbul Medeniyet Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
Istanbul, Turkey, 34862, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (14)
Ozdogan H, Ruperto N, Kasapcopur O, Bakkaloglu A, Arisoy N, Ozen S, Ugurlu U, Unsal E, Melikoglu M; Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation. The Turkish version of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) and the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ). Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001 Jul-Aug;19(4 Suppl 23):S158-62.
PMID: 11510322BACKGROUNDFranjoine MR, Gunther JS, Taylor MJ. Pediatric balance scale: a modified version of the berg balance scale for the school-age child with mild to moderate motor impairment. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2003 Summer;15(2):114-28. doi: 10.1097/01.PEP.0000068117.48023.18.
PMID: 17057441BACKGROUNDBalsalobre-Fernandez C, Tejero-Gonzalez CM, del Campo-Vecino J, Bavaresco N. The concurrent validity and reliability of a low-cost, high-speed camera-based method for measuring the flight time of vertical jumps. J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Feb;28(2):528-33. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318299a52e.
PMID: 23689339BACKGROUNDGarra G, Singer AJ, Taira BR, Chohan J, Cardoz H, Chisena E, Thode HC Jr. Validation of the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale in pediatric emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;17(1):50-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00620.x. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
PMID: 20003121BACKGROUNDWilliams EN, Carroll SG, Reddihough DS, Phillips BA, Galea MP. Investigation of the timed 'up & go' test in children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005 Aug;47(8):518-24. doi: 10.1017/s0012162205001027.
PMID: 16108451BACKGROUNDLubetzky-Vilnai A, Jirikowic TL, McCoy SW. Investigation of the Dynamic Gait Index in children: a pilot study. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2011 Fall;23(3):268-73. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e318227cd82.
PMID: 21829122BACKGROUNDShumway-Cook A, Baldwin M, Polissar NL, Gruber W. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther. 1997 Aug;77(8):812-9. doi: 10.1093/ptj/77.8.812.
PMID: 9256869BACKGROUNDJonsdottir J, Cattaneo D. Reliability and validity of the dynamic gait index in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Nov;88(11):1410-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.109.
PMID: 17964880BACKGROUNDHall CD, Herdman SJ. Reliability of clinical measures used to assess patients with peripheral vestibular disorders. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;30(2):74-81. doi: 10.1097/01.npt.0000282571.55673.ed.
PMID: 16796772BACKGROUNDChiu YP, Fritz SL, Light KE, Velozo CA. Use of item response analysis to investigate measurement properties and clinical validity of data for the dynamic gait index. Phys Ther. 2006 Jun;86(6):778-87.
PMID: 16737403BACKGROUNDHerman T, Inbar-Borovsky N, Brozgol M, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. The Dynamic Gait Index in healthy older adults: the role of stair climbing, fear of falling and gender. Gait Posture. 2009 Feb;29(2):237-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.08.013. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
PMID: 18845439BACKGROUNDMartini A. Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2012 Nov;12(1):56-9. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.07.022. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
PMID: 22884552BACKGROUNDRavelli A, Martini A. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Lancet. 2007 Mar 3;369(9563):767-778. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60363-8.
PMID: 17336654BACKGROUNDMartini A, Lovell DJ, Albani S, Brunner HI, Hyrich KL, Thompson SD, Ruperto N. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 Jan 27;8(1):5. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00332-8.
PMID: 35087087BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2025
First Posted
March 11, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2025
Primary Completion
March 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
November 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11