EVALUATION FOR YOUNG CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS
coquille
EVALUATION OF EARLY FAMILY AND MULTIFAMILY INTERVENTION FOR YOUNG CHILDREN WITH AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS
1 other identifier
interventional
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Collaborative early management of children under 30 months with autism spectrum disorder and their families in an ambulatory child psychiatry unit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2029
March 10, 2025
March 1, 2025
4.3 years
January 7, 2025
March 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (27)
Childhood Autism Rating, Scale, CARS
CARS works by rating your child's behavior, characteristics, and abilities against the expected developmental growth of a typical child.It is done by your primary healthcare provider, a teacher, or a parent by rating the child's behaviors from 1 to 4. 1 being normal for your child's age, 2 for mildly abnormal, 3 for moderately abnormal, and 4 as severely abnormal. Scores range from 15 to 60 with 30 being the cutoff rate for a diagnosis of mild autism. Scores 30-37 indicate mild to moderate autism, while scores between 38 and 60 are characterized as severe autism.
It is done before the sign of the consent (T-1),
Childhood Autism Rating, Scale, CARS
CARS works by rating your child's behavior, characteristics, and abilities against the expected developmental growth of a typical child.It is done by your primary healthcare provider, a teacher, or a parent by rating the child's behaviors from 1 to 4. 1 being normal for your child's age, 2 for mildly abnormal, 3 for moderately abnormal, and 4 as severely abnormal. Scores range from 15 to 60 with 30 being the cutoff rate for a diagnosis of mild autism. Scores 30-37 indicate mild to moderate autism, while scores between 38 and 60 are characterized as severe autism.
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
Childhood Autism Rating, Scale, CARS
CARS works by rating your child's behavior, characteristics, and abilities against the expected developmental growth of a typical child.It is done by your primary healthcare provider, a teacher, or a parent by rating the child's behaviors from 1 to 4. 1 being normal for your child's age, 2 for mildly abnormal, 3 for moderately abnormal, and 4 as severely abnormal. Scores range from 15 to 60 with 30 being the cutoff rate for a diagnosis of mild autism. Scores 30-37 indicate mild to moderate autism, while scores between 38 and 60 are characterized as severe autism.
Six month after the follow up (T2)
Sociodemographic and lifestyle
The socio-demographic questionnaire contains 4 items: Socio-demographic criteria (gender, date of birth, level of education, marital status and number of children), diet, screen, and sleep.
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
Sociodemographic and lifestyle
The socio-demographic questionnaire contains 4 items: Socio-demographic criteria (gender, date of birth, level of education, marital status and number of children), diet, screen, and sleep.
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
Sociodemographic and lifestyle
The socio-demographic questionnaire contains 4 items: Socio-demographic criteria (gender, date of birth, level of education, marital status and number of children), diet, screen, and sleep.
Six month after the follow up (T2)
Parental Stress Scale
The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) was created in 1995 to measure stress unique to parenting and captures both the joys and demands of parenting. Each following sentences describe feelings and perceptions that relate to the experience of being a parent. The PSS is brief and can be completed in less than 10 minutes. It is an 18-item self-report measure in which parents respond to statements about their typical relationship with their child. The possible range of the PSS is 18 (low stress) to 90 (high stress). Respondents indicate how much they agree or disagree to each of the 18 statements. Responses are scored as follows:Strongly disagree = 1,Disagree = 2, Undecided = 3, Agree = 4, Strongly agree = 5
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
Parental Stress Scale
The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) was created in 1995 to measure stress unique to parenting and captures both the joys and demands of parenting. Each following sentences describe feelings and perceptions that relate to the experience of being a parent. The PSS is brief and can be completed in less than 10 minutes. It is an 18-item self-report measure in which parents respond to statements about their typical relationship with their child. The possible range of the PSS is 18 (low stress) to 90 (high stress). Respondents indicate how much they agree or disagree to each of the 18 statements. Responses are scored as follows:Strongly disagree = 1,Disagree = 2, Undecided = 3, Agree = 4, Strongly agree = 5
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
Parental Stress Scale
The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) was created in 1995 to measure stress unique to parenting and captures both the joys and demands of parenting. Each following sentences describe feelings and perceptions that relate to the experience of being a parent. The PSS is brief and can be completed in less than 10 minutes. It is an 18-item self-report measure in which parents respond to statements about their typical relationship with their child. The possible range of the PSS is 18 (low stress) to 90 (high stress). Respondents indicate how much they agree or disagree to each of the 18 statements. Responses are scored as follows:Strongly disagree = 1,Disagree = 2, Undecided = 3, Agree = 4, Strongly agree = 5
Six month after the follow up (T2)
Ways of Coping Checklist
The Ways of Coping Checklist (WCCL; Folkman \& Lazarus, 1980) is a checklist of 68 items describing a broad range of behavioral and cognitive coping strategies that an individ- ual might use in a specific stressful episode.They include items from the domains of defensive coping (e.g., avoidance, intellectualization, isolation, suppression), information-seeking, problem- solving, palliation, inhibition of action, direct action, and magical thinking. The checklist is binary, yes or no, and is always answered with a specific stressful event in mind. The items on the WCCL were classified into two categories: problem- focused and emotion-focused.
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
Ways of Coping Checklist
The Ways of Coping Checklist (WCCL; Folkman \& Lazarus, 1980) is a checklist of 68 items describing a broad range of behavioral and cognitive coping strategies that an individ- ual might use in a specific stressful episode.They include items from the domains of defensive coping (e.g., avoidance, intellectualization, isolation, suppression), information-seeking, problem- solving, palliation, inhibition of action, direct action, and magical thinking. The checklist is binary, yes or no, and is always answered with a specific stressful event in mind. The items on the WCCL were classified into two categories: problem- focused and emotion-focused.
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
Ways of Coping Checklist
The Ways of Coping Checklist (WCCL; Folkman \& Lazarus, 1980) is a checklist of 68 items describing a broad range of behavioral and cognitive coping strategies that an individ- ual might use in a specific stressful episode.They include items from the domains of defensive coping (e.g., avoidance, intellectualization, isolation, suppression), information-seeking, problem- solving, palliation, inhibition of action, direct action, and magical thinking. The checklist is binary, yes or no, and is always answered with a specific stressful event in mind. The items on the WCCL were classified into two categories: problem- focused and emotion-focused.
Six month after the follow up (T2)
sense of coherence scale
The Sense of Coherence (SOC) scale evaluates how people perceive life and identifies how they use their resources of resistance to maintain and develop their health.This scale is written by Antonovsky in 1987. There is 13 items. For eachs items, you have to choose between Never, rarely, often, frequently and always.
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
sense of coherence scale
The Sense of Coherence (SOC) scale evaluates how people perceive life and identifies how they use their resources of resistance to maintain and develop their health.This scale is written by Antonovsky in 1987. There is 13 items. For eachs items, you have to choose between Never, rarely, often, frequently and always.
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
sense of coherence scale
The Sense of Coherence (SOC) scale evaluates how people perceive life and identifies how they use their resources of resistance to maintain and develop their health.This scale is written by Antonovsky in 1987. There is 13 items. For eachs items, you have to choose between Never, rarely, often, frequently and always.
Six month after the follow up (T2)
Parent Sense of Competency Scale (PSOC)
The Parenting Sense of Competency Scale (PSOC) was developed by Gibaud-Wallston as part of her PhD dissertation and presented at the American Psychological Association by Gibaud-Wallston and Wandersman in 1978. The PSOC is a 17 item scale, with 2 subscales. Each item is rated on a 6 point Likert scale anchored by 1 = "Strongly Disagree" and 6 = "Strongly Agree". Nine (9) items (#s 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 14, and 16) on the PSOC are reverse coded.
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
Parent Sense of Competency Scale (PSOC)
The Parenting Sense of Competency Scale (PSOC) was developed by Gibaud-Wallston as part of her PhD dissertation and presented at the American Psychological Association by Gibaud-Wallston and Wandersman in 1978. The PSOC is a 17 item scale, with 2 subscales. Each item is rated on a 6 point Likert scale anchored by 1 = "Strongly Disagree" and 6 = "Strongly Agree". Nine (9) items (#s 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 14, and 16) on the PSOC are reverse coded.
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
Parent Sense of Competency Scale (PSOC)
The Parenting Sense of Competency Scale (PSOC) was developed by Gibaud-Wallston as part of her PhD dissertation and presented at the American Psychological Association by Gibaud-Wallston and Wandersman in 1978. The PSOC is a 17 item scale, with 2 subscales. Each item is rated on a 6 point Likert scale anchored by 1 = "Strongly Disagree" and 6 = "Strongly Agree". Nine (9) items (#s 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 12, 14, and 16) on the PSOC are reverse coded.
Six month after the follow up (T2)
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) is a 12-item questionnaire to identify an individual's perceived level of social support with family, friends, and significant others.
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) is a 12-item questionnaire to identify an individual's perceived level of social support with family, friends, and significant others.
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)
The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) is a 12-item questionnaire to identify an individual's perceived level of social support with family, friends, and significant others.
Six month after the follow up (T2)
The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MC-SDS)
The social desirability scale is a 33-items self-report questionnaire that assesses whether or not respondents are concerned with social approval. The scale was created by Douglas P. Crowne and David Marlowe in 1960 in an effort to measure social desirability bias, which is considered one of the most common biases affecting survey research.A high number of socially desirable responses might indicate that the respondent is generally concerned with social approval and conforming to societal conventions, while a low score might indicate that the respondent is less concerned with such things and is more willing to answer survey questions truthfully and representing themselves accurately.
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MC-SDS)
The social desirability scale is a 33-items self-report questionnaire that assesses whether or not respondents are concerned with social approval. The scale was created by Douglas P. Crowne and David Marlowe in 1960 in an effort to measure social desirability bias, which is considered one of the most common biases affecting survey research.A high number of socially desirable responses might indicate that the respondent is generally concerned with social approval and conforming to societal conventions, while a low score might indicate that the respondent is less concerned with such things and is more willing to answer survey questions truthfully and representing themselves accurately.
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
The Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MC-SDS)
The social desirability scale is a 33-items self-report questionnaire that assesses whether or not respondents are concerned with social approval. The scale was created by Douglas P. Crowne and David Marlowe in 1960 in an effort to measure social desirability bias, which is considered one of the most common biases affecting survey research.A high number of socially desirable responses might indicate that the respondent is generally concerned with social approval and conforming to societal conventions, while a low score might indicate that the respondent is less concerned with such things and is more willing to answer survey questions truthfully and representing themselves accurately.
Six month after the follow up (T2)
Aberrant Behavior Checklist
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist consists of 58 questions across 5 different domains: (a) irritability, (b) social withdrawal, (c) stereotypic behavior, (d) hyperactivity/noncompliance, and (e) inappropriate speech. The rater has to answer each of the 58 questions using a 4-point Likert scale. A score of a "0" means the behavior is not a problem, a score of a "1" means slight problem, a score of a "2" means a serious problem, and a "3" means a severe problem.
Immediately after the sign of the consent (T0)
Aberrant Behavior Checklist
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist consists of 58 questions across 5 different domains: (a) irritability, (b) social withdrawal, (c) stereotypic behavior, (d) hyperactivity/noncompliance, and (e) inappropriate speech. The rater has to answer each of the 58 questions using a 4-point Likert scale. A score of a "0" means the behavior is not a problem, a score of a "1" means slight problem, a score of a "2" means a serious problem, and a "3" means a severe problem.
Six month after the use of coquille device (T1)
Aberrant Behavior Checklist
The Aberrant Behavior Checklist consists of 58 questions across 5 different domains: (a) irritability, (b) social withdrawal, (c) stereotypic behavior, (d) hyperactivity/noncompliance, and (e) inappropriate speech. The rater has to answer each of the 58 questions using a 4-point Likert scale. A score of a "0" means the behavior is not a problem, a score of a "1" means slight problem, a score of a "2" means a serious problem, and a "3" means a severe problem.
Six month after the follow up (T2)
Study Arms (1)
coquille device
OTHERcollaborative family support scheme aimed at improving family functioning and child behaviour
Interventions
Modalities: Elaboration of the personalized care project, follow-up parents-child single family, multi-family therapy (MFT). Frequency: MFT weekly, bi-familial observation weekly for one month, single-parent child-parent monitoring weekly for five months, MFT father-child bimonthly for six months, three co-parents, three child psychiatric consultations to develop the personalized collaborative care project
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years and over
- French language spoken and written by the parent
- Free and informed consent form , initialled and signed by the parent
- Total CARS score greater than or equal to 30
- Free and informed consent form, initialled and signed by legal representatives
You may not qualify if:
- Any acute, somatic or psychiatric clinical condition of the mother not compatible with therapeutic intervention.
- Current engagement in an interventional research protocol
- Mother under protection of justice, guardianship or enhanced curatorship
- Mother no longer having parental authority
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Eps Ville Evrard
Neuilly-sur-Marne, 93330, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pierre LECARPENTIER, MBBS
EPS VILLE EVRARD
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MBBS, psychiatrist and investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2025
First Posted
March 10, 2025
Study Start
November 29, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2029
Last Updated
March 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share