Transversus Abdominis Plane Lock Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block in Children
Pediatric Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Quadratus Lumborum Block: a Prospective Randomized Study in Sub-umbilical Peripheral Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although abdominal wall surgeries are also as routinely performed on pediatric patients, postoperative pain in children has remained under-researched compared to adults. Consequently, there has been a growing need for adapting regional analgesia to this distinct population. While the Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) and Quadratus Lumborum Block (QLB) have been established as potent sensory blocks in adult practice, data on their efficiency in pediatric abdominal parietal surgeries remain scarce. The investigators aimed to compare the analgesic effect of lateral TAPB versus posterior QLB in children undergoing elective abdominal wall surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2025
CompletedMarch 6, 2025
March 1, 2025
6 months
November 24, 2024
March 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to first rescue analgesia
Time (in minutes) from the completion of the block to first analgesia administration based on postoperative pain score (assessed using FLACC (Face Legs Activity Crying Consolability) in ward \>3)
3 hours
Secondary Outcomes (6)
block Failure rate
30 minutes
FLACC scale pain scores
2 hours
PPMP scale scores
24 hours
Total analgesic consumption
24 hours
Post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV)
24 hours
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
TAP block group
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound-guided TAP block group
QLB block group
ACTIVE COMPARATORUltrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum block group
Interventions
The operator applied a linear ultrasound probe transversally to the mid-axillary line between the costal margin and iliac crest. Landmarks were then identified as three muscles layers beneath the subcutaneous tissue; from external to internal lay respectively the external oblique muscle (EO), the internal oblique muscle (IO) and the transversus abdominis (TA). The needle was inserted in plane from the iliac crest level on the midaxillary line advancing towards the midline to the fascia laying between the IO and the TA muscles until pop detection. A clear aspiration ruled out vascular effraction. Finally, the space between the two muscle planes was hydrodissected with the bupivacaine.The end goal was visualizing the IO moving upward leaving room to a hypoechoic lens-shaped local anesthetic distribution.
The patient was laid in a lateral decubitus position. The operator applied the probe transversally on the iliac crest directing the indicator to display the back muscles encompassed by the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF).The intended image was spotted by the emergence of the transverse process L4, delimiting the stem of a shamrock-like shape. Quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle represented the upper leaf of the shamrock, and psoas major (PM) and erector spinae (ES) stood respectively for the anterior and posterior leaves. The needle was inserted in plane from the postero-median lumbar wall directed antero-laterally with tip aiming at the posterior border of the QL muscle adjacent to the ES muscles. Pop detection indicated the middle TLF where the local anesthetic would spread, homogenous and resistance-free
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- We included patients aged from 1 to 10 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II.
You may not qualify if:
- Later on after allocation, patients were excluded for block failure or major perioperative complications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tunis Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Bechir Hamza Children's Hospital
Tunis, 1029, Tunisia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full Professor of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, head chief of the department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2024
First Posted
March 6, 2025
Study Start
October 1, 2022
Primary Completion
March 31, 2023
Study Completion
June 28, 2023
Last Updated
March 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share