Designing a Tailored Primary Care Intervention to Manage the Burden of Caring for Patients Living with Alzheimer's Disease (or a Related Dementia)
ISAMA-PP
1 other identifier
observational
30
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The design of the intervention is an ongoing process which will consist of two phases: a determination of the intervention using the Delphi-modified consensus method and an assessment of its acceptability, as described in the methodological recommendations of the Medical Research Council Guidance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Nov 2024
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 21, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 28, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedFebruary 28, 2025
January 1, 2025
1.4 years
January 31, 2025
February 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
description of the tailored primary care intervention to manage the burden of caring for patients living with Alzheimer's disease (or related dementia)
A list of interventions will be submitted to 3 panels of participants using the DELPHI method (panel of carers, panel of healthcare professionals and panel of academic experts). Each participant will rate his or her agreement with each of the proposals with a score ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree). For each proposal, the proportion of scores \>= 7, the proportion of scores between 4 and 6 and the proportion of scores \<=3 will be estimated. Proposals with at least 70% of ratings \>= 7 are retained. Proposals with at least 70% of scores \<= 3 are eliminated. Proposal with at least 70% of scores between 4 and 6 will be reformulated by the members of the scientific committee and reproposed in the following round. It usually takes between 3-4 rounds to eliminate/validate proposals: the complex intervention will be built on the consensus reached in theses rounds and reported using the TIDieR checklist model.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
acceptability of the complex intervention by carers and healthcare professionals
6 months
Study Arms (3)
Group caregiver
Qualitative interviews and focus groups
Group health professional
Qualitative interviews and focus groups
Group academic expert
Qualitative interviews and focus groups
Eligibility Criteria
Determining the intervention using the DELPHI-modified method, the 30 participants will be academic experts (10 people) and people from the 2 professional communities (CPTS) that took part in the exploratory studies, Asclepios and Est Cher (10 primary healthcare professionals and 10 carers). The 10 carers will have different characteristics depending on the level of dependency and the extent of the behavioural problems of the patient they are helping, and on their family status (parent, child or other). They will also come from the care areas of the 2 CPTS, Asclepios and Est Cher. Concerning the qualitative sociological exploration of the process of acceptability and co-construction of the intervention, the 30 participants will be academic experts (the 10 people identified above) and people from the 3 CPTS, Asclepios, Est Cher and Iroise who tested the conceived intervention (10 healthcare professionals and 10 carers).
You may qualify if:
- Healthcare professionals who are members of the 3 CPTSs included and who agree to participate
- Adult informal carers of patients living with Alzheimer's disease or a related dementia from the 3 CPTS who agree to participate
- University experts: general practitioners, geriatric mobile team doctor, advanced practice nurse, clinical psychologist, biostatistical methodologist. Some of them had already taken part in the steering committee for ISAMA's exploratory qualitative and quantitative studies.
You may not qualify if:
- \- Professional carers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
CPTS Asclepios
Amboise, 37400, France
CPTS Pays d'Iroise
Saint-Renan, 29290, France
CPTS Est Cher
Sancergues, 18140, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2025
First Posted
February 28, 2025
Study Start
November 21, 2024
Primary Completion
May 1, 2026
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01