Effectiveness of Early Intervention in Palliative Care for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Comparing to Standard of Care
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Hemato-oncology patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy treatments experience different types of symptoms during and after treatments, which are often refractory to the established therapy. Physical symptoms such as pain, dyspnea, mucositis, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation and diarrhea, among others, have a huge impact on quality of life, temporarily until symptomatic control, but also permanently with the development of anxiety, depression, long-term fatigue and post-traumatic stress. As recommended by ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology), the palliative approach to oncological diseases must be as early as possible and be part of the "standard of care". However, the lack of concrete data on this topic in the last decade served as a barrier to the early integration of this same care for hemato-oncology patients in its various areas. Palliative care presupposes global, interdisciplinary action, carried out by specific teams that must act in situations of incurable or serious illness, in an advanced and progressive phase. The potential benefits can be countless and of significant importance, from the impact on quality of life, symptomatic control, reduction of anxiety and depression and even the promotion of informed and conscious choices at the end of life as well as the reduction of aggressive strategies. used at this stage of the disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 27, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2026
February 27, 2025
January 1, 2025
1.3 years
February 3, 2025
February 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Fatigue
Assessment of participant fatigue using the Fatigue Scale FACIT. The lower the score, the higher the fatigue.
At diagnosis/start of treatment; After induction cycle (approximately after 1 month); After consolidation cycles (approximately after 2 and 3 months)
Quality of life - Functional Scale, Global Health Status, Symptom Scale
Assessment of quality of life using the questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30. Contains 30 questions assessing three dimensions: 1) Functional Scales: The higher the score, the greater the functional level. 2) Global Health Status: The higher the score, the better the quality of life. 3) Symptom Scales: The higher the score, the greater the severity or frequency of symptoms.
At diagnosis/start of treatment; After induction cycle (approximately after 1 month); After consolidation cycles (approximately after 2 and 3 months)
Anxiety and depression
Assessment of anxiety and depression using HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), composed of two subscales for anxiety and depression, each with scores categorized as normal (0-7), mild (8-10), moderate (11-14), and severe (15-21). A score ≥ 11 indicates the presence of anxiety and/or depression.
At diagnosis/start of treatment; After induction cycle (approximately after 1 month); After consolidation cycles (approximately after 2 and 3 months)
Symptoms and multidimensional well-being
Assessment of symptoms and multidimensional well-being using the scale IPOS (Palliative care Outcome Scale). Composed by: Q1: Open-ended question, no scoring, used to guide care; Q2-Q5: Scales of 0-4, where higher scores indicate greater symptom severity; Q6-Q8: Positive items, scored 0-4, where lower scores are better; Q10: Open-ended question, no scoring. Sum of the scores from the rated questions (0-68).
At diagnosis/start of treatment; After induction cycle (approximately after 1 month); After consolidation cycles (approximately after 2 and 3 months)
Study Arms (2)
Early follow up by the palliative care team
ACTIVE COMPARATOREarly follow up by the palliative care team, that is, from diagnosis
Standard of care: conventional treatment
NO INTERVENTIONConventional treatment by the Hematology team where this referral is made only in specific cases in which hematologists understand that this need exists.
Interventions
Early follow up by the palliative care team, from diagnosis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Capable of making decisions
- Diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia
- Aged 70 years or less
- Treated or referred for treatment at the Hematology department of Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João.
You may not qualify if:
- All patients referred for "best supportive care", that is, for supportive care including treatment with cytoreductive intent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universidade do Portolead
- Centro Hospitalar De São João, E.P.E.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de São João
Porto, 4200-319, Portugal
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2025
First Posted
February 27, 2025
Study Start
April 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share